It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I have done some simple comparisons of the data presented to other known data. It does not seem to me that the levels of metals found in the tests were high. I am trying to learn something.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Phage
Obviously then you are not here to debate..
Your opinion is already set and nothing will change that..
Not really sure why you are posting with such a closed mind...
If Dr. Thyme feels my inquires are out of line that is his prerogative but he was invited here to answer such questions. If this is just going to be another "chemtrail" thread full of poorly defined science and hand waving, what's the point?
Originally posted by shagreen heart
in spite of the huge derailment hit this thread took, i'm honestly surprised how dead this thread is... >.>
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by shagreen heart
in spite of the huge derailment hit this thread took, i'm honestly surprised how dead this thread is... >.>
Yeah, well do you really blame the good doctor for not wanting to post??
Agendas were obvious from the start..Shame really...
US Weather minima for VFR flight outside Controlled Airspace (within Class E Airspace)
At or above 10,000 ft. MSL
5 statute miles visibility, 1 statute mile horizontally from clouds, 1000ft above and below clouds
Below 10,000 ft. MSL
3 statute miles visibility, 2000 ft. horizontally from clouds, 1000ft above and 500 ft below clouds
US Weather minima for VFR flight in Class C and D airspace
3 statue miles visibility, 2000 ft. horizontally from clouds, 1000ft above and 500 ft below clouds
None of these people sign any sort of government nondisclosure agreements, none of them have to get DOD clearance, none of them are held to any level of secrecy….
And not a single one has ever come forward to agree that this is occurring…
Get it yet?
Hoax.
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by backinblack
You’re talking about low level VFR flights that would be similar to mosquito control flights or crop dusting. These types of flights do not make the “clouds” that the chemtrail crowd claim define chemtrails.
Edit to add:
These things were also done on a very limited scale, nowhere near that claimed with chemtrails.edit on 3/5/2011 by defcon5 because: (no reason given)
No one denies that there are aerial spray applications preformed for many things including pest control, the argument is that these types of real spraying have nothing to do with those lines in the sky you all call chemtrails.
Originally posted by shagreen heart
Originally posted by backinblack
Yeah, well do you really blame the good doctor for not wanting to post??
Agendas were obvious from the start..Shame really...
as soon as i read there was going to be a pro in here to talk about chemtrails of all things, i instantly foresaw the worst s#storm, and it happened (started by retardo mods no less. seriously, i wish i had been part of the thread when it started, i would have loved to pick apart some of the stupid things that got posted early on).
Actually, you are quite incorrect.
If you go back and read the thread the original post by myself was quite on the topic of the threads video, was cordial, and polite. The first attacks in this thread came from your friend there, Backinblack with this post here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
In which he decided that he did not like a mod, whom he knows is an opponent of chemtrails, chiming in, so he decided to try and play moderator himself and take a potshot at me. I chose to ignore that remark as well as the rest of the personal attacks against me up until here, 7 pages later. The fact that almost none of these personal attacks have been actioned should speak volumes for the fact that there is no agenda here by any moderators to block anything.
So, have similar quanties of aluminium been found in widespread locations all over the planet? Yes or no?