It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lemmehowdt
[edit Pianopraze] invited me to join the discussion - i am the chemist from the movie. The Mt. Shasta data that was used was good analytical data with proper quality control. The question of the source of the metals, aluminum, barium and strontium can not be addressed from those samples. There is a significant difference in water vapors from contrails and the clouds from chemtrails. I am a chemist - I will be pleased to address the chemistry questions that are brought up here.
Metals change their coordination sphere at different pH. The pH is a function of the acid/base levels of the environment. Most metals become oxidized as the pH rises - that is the water becomes more basic. Aluminum is definitely more mobile in acids than bases. The compound alumina - Al2O3 is inert to chemical reaction, but has significant bad effects in biological systems because it takes up space and cannot be removed by metabolic processes that require chemical reactions. It deposits where it is and requires physical removal over time.
Rather than attempt to glean all the commentary. please ask the significant chemistry questions again and i will make comment. I am also offering a course on The many facets of water on-line this spring at NWETI.com . I look forward to getting these facts right - and stopping the release of all non-natural materials in the environment.
Originally posted by lemmehowdt
Sorry Richard, my bad. I cannot send a reply to you because i have less than 20 posts. I would like a new line - the area here has me totally confused about how to respond. Not like any chat i have been to before. I would like to respond, but i don't get how this thing works - there seem to be too many input streams that refer back to themselves, so i keep reading the same thing over and over. Yuk.
Originally posted by lemmehowdt
sure - i will try to answer live questions
Originally posted by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by lemmehowdt
Well welcome to ats sir
Glad to make your acquaintance and I look forward to an exchange of insight and info.
My question: Since making the documentary, what additional evidence have you gathered to support your claims?
I have more but would rather just observe a discussion with some of our more scientific minded members(and critiques of the chem-trail theory) like Phage and Weedwhacker.
Better get your info together and keep it handy because details will be required.
peace,
spec
the option that is taken most seriously is altogether grander in conception and scale. The scheme proposes nothing less than the transformation of the chemical composition of the Earth's atmosphere so that humans can regulate the temperature of the planet as desired. Like volcanic eruptions, it involves injecting sulphur dioxide gas into the stratosphere to blanket the Earth with tiny particles that reflect solar radiation.
Various schemes have been proposed, with the most promising being adaptation of high-flying aircraft fitted with extra tanks and nozzles to spray the chemicals. A fleet of 747s could do the job.
Stratospheric aerosols these were found to be feasible
royalsociety.org...
Originally posted by lemmehowdt
sure - i will try to answer live questions
Originally posted by StripedBandit
S+F.
As the video is over an hour and a half can you summarize for those who dont have time? Or perhaps suggest to us interesting parts to skip to? Thanks in advance.
i am the chemist from the movie. The Mt. Shasta data that was used was good analytical data with proper quality control.