Freemasonry and its Involvement In Colonialism, Wars, Genocides and Revolutions.

reply to post by AugustusMasonicus

This will help you...establishing military lodges to accelerate the growth of colonial freemasonry, Great Idea.

At the close of the French and Indian Wars, in the last half of the 18th century, there were about 50 military lodges in the Colonies. They were warranted by both the Ancient and Modern Grand Lodges of England, and by the Grand Lodges of Scotland, Ireland, and the Provincial Grand Lodges of Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New York. At the time hostilities started in the Revolution, the number of military lodges had increased about 50 per cent. At the close of the French and Indian Wars there were, in addition to the military lodges, about one hundred lodges warranted by the Grand Lodges previously named. Military lodges greatly accelerated the growth of Colonial Freemasonry.

One Freemason, mentioned but little, left a work that has endured throughout the years. Amos Doolittle, a native of Connecticut, served in the Colonial Army under Benedict Arnold, and made the engravings of the skirmish at Lexington which have been reproduced many times. mastermason

reply to post by Lucifer777

Actually fascism is defined as "Fascism, , is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation on corporatist perspectives; values; and systems such as the political system and the economy."

I'm no fan of the last few administrations, but I do not stand with anarchists or marxists. I still believe in freedom.

reply to post by vinay86

Lightning bolts are not exclusively used by the Nazis and those of similar minds. Plus the Indiana Grand Lodge's compasses show lightning bolts with mirrored bolts. The SS symbol had exact duplicate bolts next to each other.

reply to post by vinay86


And the point? Notice it did not say that Masonry excelerated the growth of Colonialism.

Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by Lucifer777

 

Actually fascism is defined as "Fascism, , is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation on corporatist perspectives; values; and systems such as the political system and the economy."

I'm no fan of the last few administrations, but I do not stand with anarchists or marxists. I still believe in freedom.

Doublespeak

Part of the problem in using human language is that while everyone debating here is using the English language; we do no all have the same definitions of important terms, dependent on our political ideology.

For example "KSigMason" claims to believe in "freedom."

A slavemaster or slave trader may also claim to believe in "freedom;" the freedom to own and trade in human flesh. The slave however may also demand "freedom;" but the slave has a different definition of the term.

The defenders of the "International Dicatorship of Capitalism" also believe in freedom, but an economic slavemaster will always have a different definition of "freedom" than the economic slaves and victims of such a system, such as the 200 million people in the world who are always on the brink of starvation; to a Capitalist, freedom means the freedom to use food as a commodity and to export food products from the poorest nations on earth to fill the supermarket shelves of the most obese populations on earth.

In the Cuban Revolution for example, the Communists did not define "freedom" as the rule of gangsters, pimps, casino owners and US corporations; in pre-revolutionary Cuba there were 100,000 prostitutes for example, and it was a Mafia paradise where the Mafia had almost unfettered freedom, and it is this kind of "freedom" which the Capitalists demand; the freedom to have an army of economic slaves and sex slaves.

The current dictatorship of Capitalism is "International" and not primarily nationalist, thus the term Neofascism is probably more appropriate. As an indication of what Capitalist Neofascists refer to as "freedom," it is certainly not the "freedom" to elect Socialists, as the CIA backed coups to overthow Chile's Allende and Venezuela's Chavez make clear.

Lux

reply to post by Lucifer777

What people should notice the definition of fascism, is its nationalizing the economy under a single authoritarian government which sounds exactly like what you have been preaching. I'm no slave, I'm not ignorant, and I am for peace. I least of all wish for peace among most others in this world.

I believe in freedom to do what I want, when I want, and how I want within the bounds of the US Constitution. I believe in basic human rights as we are all created equal and all inhabit this planet. I also believe in economic freedom since I earned my wages I don't need some suit taking most of it away for what he sees is his duty as "he knows better". I'm no welfare baby nor did I grow up with a silver spoon in my ass, I earned everything I have today. Any failures I had on my way only strengthened me and I didn't blame them on some stereotype.

I'm sure you support such men as Ghaddafi as well.

reply to post by AugustusMasonicus

And the point? Notice it did not say that Masonry excelerated the growth of Colonialism.

I think the mind control programming is little too deep on you. But I will try my best to help you.

Military lodges greatly accelerated the growth of Colonial Freemasonry. Source.

Focus on the words Military lodges and Colonial Freemasonry. And if you don't want to focus on that, then I suggest you should read this masonic book.

Builders Of Empires: Freemasonry and British Imperialism.

In the colonies, Masonry's long-established associations with men of prominence ( such as military officers and colonial governors) made it attractive to rising men who sought status and power to accompany their wealth. Local lodges were willing to admit some men of humble origins, but colonial Masons made every effort to ensure the respectability of the brotherhood by regulating the membership, conducting elaborate public ceremonials, and keeping leadership positions in the hands of the most respectable brethren.

The brotherhood was thus instrumental in the making of a colonial middle class and defining its boundaries at the very moment its male constituents were entering into power sharing arrangements with traditional elites The brotherhood that was initially open to all men was, after the age of revolution, dominated by loyalist, Protestant, respectable white men.

By the last third of the nineteenth century, the Masonic brotherhood had become an unquestioning ally of the British imperial state. It took part in various efforts to shore up the empire in the face of internal and external pressures during the age of high imperialism. Imperial proconsuls like Kitchener, Wolseley, and Connaught considered Freemasonry a valuable ally not only as they governed and defended the empire but also as they pursued the imperialist mission of making the empire a source of national strength. Source.

If you still can't see anything, I would suggest you to use some psychology techniques to deprogram yourself.

Originally posted by vinay86
I think the mind control programming is little too deep on you.

And I think your inability to provide sources to support your claim is blinding you to facts and reason.

In the colonies, Masonry's long-established associations with men of prominence ( such as military officers and colonial governors) made it attractive to rising men who sought status and power to accompany their wealth. Local lodges were willing to admit some men of humble origins, but colonial Masons made every effort to ensure the respectability of the brotherhood by regulating the membership, conducting elaborate public ceremonials, and keeping leadership positions in the hands of the most respectable brethren....

Do you have a reading comprehension issue? The exerpt you provided (from a book review no less) is speaking of Masonry in the 19th Century and how it appealed to the middle class:

Reacting against Freemasonry's elasticity during the previous century, grand lodge officals fought and won a struggle to gain control over the brotherhood by concsiously identifying the brotherhood with loyalty to the state. Meanwhile, as the Catholic Chirch waged a sustained campaign against worldwide Freemasonry, the brotherhood became a primarily Protestant institution.

This was the paragraph previous to the ones you linked, notice the bolded section. Notice once again it does not make mention of how Masonry allegedly spurred the growth of colonialism. The 19th Century came after the 18th Century which was where the Colonial Era of the United States occured. It is fairly obvious you have a biased and irrational position towards Masonry, and frankly I could not care, but you constantly allow your hysterical emotions to lead you to regurgitate quotes without properly digesting them.

If you still can't see anything, I would suggest you to use some psychology techniques to deprogram yourself.

And I suggest some reading lessons.

reply to post by AugustusMasonicus

excelerated, exerpt : It seems you are having a little trouble with words. Everything that I have said is in the OP, but you obviously haven't read anything. It clearly says freemasonry expanded itself through colonization i.e. through murdering, exploitation and enslavement. So I am going to post the same line again.

Military lodges greatly accelerated the growth of Colonial Freemasonry. Source.

You haven't told me the meaning of Military Lodges and Colonial Freemasonry.

Freemasonry In America

Freemasonry came to America with the colonists in 16th century, they established military lodges in America.

Masonry arrived in the Colonies in 1682 when John Skene of Aberdeen Lodge, came to Burlington, New Jersey. Nothing much more is known of him. Over the next 50 years Colonial Freemasons exercised the immemorial right of Masons to form a lodge and make Masons. Coil reports evidence that although no chartered lodge existed in the Colonies, a lodge was held in King’s Chapel in Boston in 1720, and that the Boston News Letter for May 25, 1727 gave a detailed account of the Grand Lodge meeting in London. source.

It was during this period, 1670-1759, that Freemasonry seriously came to North Amer- ica. English, Irish and Scottish Military Lodges brought it with them. Its concepts slowly caught on with the thinking men in the colonies. Source.

Freemasonry In Africa

How freemasonry entered Africa, let's ask a mason.....

The Southern point of Africa, the Cape of Good Hope, was opened up by the Dutch East India Company as a trading station to supply ships on the route to the East Indies with fresh produce. Freemasonry in the Netherlands, founded in 1756, was expanding rapidly and, with many masters of ships being Freemasons, it was natural for a Lodge to be founded at this halfway station under the banner of the Grand East of the Netherlands (G.E.N.). Source.

Freemasonry In India

How freemasonry came to India. The answer is same it was imposed by "colonist Freemasons."

Q). When did Freemasonry come to India? A). The honor of receiving Freemasonry in India goes to Calcutta. In 1730 officers of the East Indian Company held their meetings in Fort William, Calcutta. The number given to the Lodge was 72 masonindia

East India company was a British colonial company, If you don't know that.

reply to post by vinay86


In your Original Post you state that Masonry colonized other countries as a for profit adventure. None of the 'sources' you linked supports your assertion, much to the contrary, many of them actually run counter to your arguement.

Were some colonist Masons? Of course. Does this make colonization a Masonic endeavor? Not at all. By your logic we could say left-handedness led to genocide and wars as I am fairly certain the number of left handed colonists grew from zero to a larger number after colonization.

Stop clinging to certain words and phrases (miltary lodge, colonial Masonry, etc.) and instead post evidence that proves your intial allegation.

reply to post by vinay86


Interesting thread. While I agree to some extent you may find it more useful to look upon the Freemasons as a tool of conversion to Capitalism. You'll find the landscape makes much more sense from that perspective.

The original colonists, pure Capitalists, secondary occupation, the Civil and Military one, was facilitated by Freemasonary, it conditioned those 'Civil' servants and Crown paid mercenaries in the ways of colonialism, and then, enabled dissemination, by throwing open membership to select natives, of that ideology.

Freemasonary, by it's very nature, is conformist and submissive. It was designed that way.

Also, as far as monarchs go, following Cromwell, the monarchy is basically beneath the Capitalists or dependent upon State/Parliament...a servant of the people, and a cushion between the people and the State (landowners, Merchants and Capitalists[The City]) Parliaments. The monarchy were subsequently, similarly indoctrinated into Freemasonary. Inbreeding is not renowed for producing those in possession of full faculties, and a sheltered upbringing ensures insularisation of beliefs. The reliance of the Stuarts upon their advisors, as well as all subsequent houses, and the various acts of parliament that further limited the powers of the monarch, including succession rights, have led to defacto, a figurehead and very little more (tax drain would be another, but that is a whole different topic).

reply to post by KilgoreTrout

Freemasons as a tool of conversion to Capitalism.
The monarchy were subsequently, similarly indoctrinated into Freemasonry.
The original colonists, pure Capitalists, secondary occupation, the Civil and Military one, was facilitated by Freemasonry, it conditioned those 'Civil' servants and Crown paid mercenaries in the ways of colonialism, and then, enabled dissemination, by throwing open membership to select natives, of that ideology.

Thanks for posting, That was what I was trying to express through this thread, Freemasonry is a gang of capitalist monarchs who wholeheartedly participated and followed ideologies of colonialism.

Freemasonry is own and operated by capitalists, who want to establish capitalist empires throughout the world and then earn profits through plundering and exploitation of those countries and keep themselves wealthy and attain supremacy. They had, and are using freemasonry to dominate countries through economics, political and military power.

As I have said in the OP, all the Freemasons up to 33 degree are just minions of these capitalist, they can make Freemasons to act as their defenders, colonizers of rich countries or send them into battlefields to murder innocents and earn profits through war. And all through that they always try to remain hidden, by using secret societies to influence politics and hide their misdeeds.

Originally posted by vinay86
Freemasonry is own and operated by capitalists, who want to establish capitalist empires throughout the world and then earn profits through plundering and exploitation of those countries and keep themselves wealthy and attain supremacy. They had, and are using freemasonry to dominate countries through economics, political and military power.

In all honestly I agree that it is likely that that was the case I don't think it is any longer. The fact, for instance, that structurally it hasn't evolved is indicative of that. It evolved elsewhere, or rather into another beast. Think of it more as a reptile shedding it's skin. Freemasonary is the skin that remains. Emergent Protestantism bears similar traits if you look at the way that developed into a hybrid Catholicism in England, with Anglicanism forging a middle path between Protestantism and Roman Catholicism, thus enabling her to maintain trade relations with both conflicting groups, Freemasonary helped in some ways to preserve that particular divide within central Europe, particularly with the Lutheran Prussians. Even the sepraticism in Scotland can be viewed as a means by which England was able to maintain trade with the Eastern Orthodox and Scandinavian nations without it seeming as though they were dealing with their Empirical enemy. For such a little island, England successfully dominated world trade for nigh on five centuries, you can only do that with cunning. And much piracy.

Freemasonary, or the cover that Freemasonary had supplied, became the Secret Services, a selection of other, more specialised groups and private agencies serving individual corporations etc, but they serve the same essential purpose, which is why the US perhaps is/was slow in catching up, as they did not have a Secret Service until MI6 helped them create one, during and following world war one. Their innocence had been exploited I suppose by then so it didn't matter and they were back on side of the capitalists, so whoopee, they could be let into some of the secrets.

reply to post by AugustusMasonicus

edit on 6-3-2011 by AugustusMasonicus because: Networkdude has no beer. Link.

I don't have any beer, because I don't drink. But I can offer you few definitions of colonialism to help you. Because you don't even Know what colonialism is. There was not one Freemason colonist, their was whole army of Freemason colonist Lords, viceroys, generals etc. I quoted only masonic websites, to give you proof that Freemasons were wholeheartedly involved in colonialism. Now, what Colonialism is, you can see for yourself.

The purposes of colonialism included economic exploitation of the colony’s natural resources, creation of new markets for the colonizer, and extension of the colonizer’s way of life beyond its national borders.Britannica.

the system or policy by which a country maintains foreign colonies, esp. in order to exploit them economically. Link.

Only If you Know the meaning of Economic Exploitation you can discern the meaning of Colonialism. But through your posts, I got the Idea about what kind of people join freemasonry. And the answer is Ignorant people, who can be easily brainwashed and misled-ed by freemasonry.

Economic impact of the British rule in India

Economic impact of the British rule in India was really vast. The chief motive of the British to establish political control in India was mainly associated with the exploitation of economic and commercial conditions of the country. They wanted to establish a colonial market in this country for the British goods. British impact on the economic conditions of India was really devastating and harmful. Britain used the most complicated methods to exploit India’s vast rich economic reserves of India. After a control of two hundred years the British completely shattered the economic set up of India. As a result, after the independence, the scenario of the country was that of an economically underdeveloped nation prevailing with hunger, poverty, low national income, etc. Source.

Originally posted by vinay86
I don't have any beer, because I don't drink.

That is your problem and also irrelevant.

But I can offer you few definitions of colonialism to help you.

We are not debating the definition of colonialism so stop being obtuse. We are debating whether you can prove your assertion the the goal of Masonry was colonialism. Your rather weak and condescending reply proves that you still have not been able to unearth any evidence to support your outlandish claim.

I quoted only masonic websites, to give you proof that Freemasons were wholeheartedly involved in colonialism.

You forgot to mention the book reviews and blogs you tried to use as sources so stop being disengenious. You must assume that everyone has a short-term memory issue.

Only If you Know the meaning of Economic Exploitation you can discern the meaning of Colonialism.

Irrelevant. Prove your point and stop posting useless tangents.

Hypnosis in MPD: Ritual Abuse

Now one of the things that I would very carefully check is, I would suggest that you ask the core, not just the unconscious mind, ask the core, "Is there any part inside that continues to have contact with people associated with the Cult? Is there any part inside who goes to Cult rituals or meetings?

The Satanism comes in the overall philosophy overriding [to suppress] all of this.

People say, "What's the purpose of it?" My best guess is that the purpose of it is that they want an army of Manchurian Candidates, ten of thousands of mental robots who will do prostitution, do child pornography, smuggle drugs, engage in international arms smuggling, do snuff films, all sorts of very lucrative things and do their bidding and eventually the megalomaniacs at the top believe they'll create a Satanic Order that will rule the world. Source.

reply to post by vinay86


Of course, Dr. Hammond has distanced himself from that speech again and again... Probably because he was named in lawsuits accusing him of planting false memories in patients...

Rothschild And Profits Through War.

The Masonic reference book 10,000 Famous Freemasons, Vol. 4, p.74, indicates two other sons of Amschel were Masons, James Meyer Rothschild, and his brother Nathan Meyer Rothschild. James Rothschild in Paris was a 33 degree Scottish Rite Mason, and his brother Nathan in London was a member of the Lodge of Emulation. And Jewish Freemason Katz indicates Solomon Meir Rothschild, a third member of the five brothers, was initiated into Freemasonry on June 14, 1809.(31) The Rothschilds became powerful within Freemasonry. Source.

 

The ones who fled to Europe curried favor with kings and princes and offered them their secret Masonic people-herding technology. Eventually a very elite group of them intermarried successfully with the royalty and became the ruling family of Europe. They were known as the Rothschilds and their secret rule of Europe continues to this day. Although they try to stay hidden and their past is filled with great evil, they also deserve much credit for helping make Europe and European culture so dominant in the world.

One of their secrets was to drive the people into conflict and war, both to strengthen them through competition and to profit from the sale of arms. Creating war also made the Celts easier to control because, in times of turmoil, people turn to their kings for protection.

The Rothschilds used money looted from India to finance the American revolution. Source.

Originally posted by vinay86

...The Rothschilds used money looted from India to finance the American revolution. Source.

At least you are consistent. Your second 'source' is not a source but once again an opinion piece. The fact that the person does not cite any other material to support their claims would be a dead give away to anyone who does not have an irrational and hysterical motive.

From your 'source':

Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives. We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. As with all controversies, we stand ready to post any and all rebuttals and responses from people mentioned in the material we post.

Skewed logic? Is that code word for crap? Keep posting 'sources' like this vin, you make yourself look like a professional detectice.

Puppets of Zionism and Freemasonry

Due to orchestrated misinformation which has been overwhelmingly diffused worldwide over many successive decades, the global public opinion has been left in mysteries as regards the root causes of the interminable Middle Eastern conflicts.

To destroy the Ottoman Empire, the Freemasonic, Anti-Christian regimes of England and France introduced a wide range of tactics, establishing a link between the academic disciplines of Humanities (mainly specialized in the various provinces of the Ottoman Empire, Iran and Mogul India) and the political - military intelligence. From this successfully financed project emanated many fake terms that did not exist before and are indeed by themselves meaningless.

Useless to add that ethnic amalgamation did not truly take place following the Islamic expansion, as the Freemasonic Anglo-French forgers have long pretended, because the Arabs, who moved out of Hedjaz and settled in various parts of the early Caliphate, were very few if compared with the local populations. The total population of Arabia at the times of Prophet Muhammad was less than the population of just one significant Egyptian, Aramaean, Persian or Roman city.

This reality has been systematically kept under silence by the Anglo-French Freemasonic academia (the Orientalists) and diplomacy. Source.

Freemason President Omar Bongo.

A tool of French imperialism in Africa

Omar Bongo was born Albert-Bernard Bongo, into a farming family with 12 children in southern Gabon. He was orphaned at age 12, then raised by an uncle working for the colonial administration. At age 17 he left home for Brazzaville, the capital of the nearby French Congo, and worked at a post office.

Upon his arrival in Brazzaville, he joined the Freemasonry and the social-democratic SFIO (French Section of the Workers’ International). Freemasonry, a bourgeois and secular secret society, had longstanding traditions in the colonial administration.

The Gaullists created a complex system of networks and lobbies in Africa, allowing the French bourgeoisie to not only earn huge profits, but also to plan a series of assassinations, military coups, and interventions.

Bongo quickly made his first steps into politics, using his connections in Freemasonry to get involved in the first election campaign of the independent Gabon, in 1961.

The regime that evolved under Bongo— a one-party dictatorship dependent on French military support to repress the masses at every major internal crisis— was perfectly suited to French imperialism's requirements.

The plundering of Gabon

Bongo turned Gabon into an outpost to serve French interests in Africa. He helped France in its support for the secessionist war in the oil-rich Nigerian province of Biafra.

In the early 1970s, oil became Gabon's biggest export. The country joined OPEC in 1975. In order to prepare for this, Bongo converted to Islam in 1973, at the recommendation of Libyan dictator Moammar Gaddafi. He took Omar as his first name.

Bongo thus presided over a system whereby Gabon's economy was plundered in the interests of a narrow layer of corrupt French politicians and businessmen. Source.