It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by filosophia
Well considering they are saying he used a glock 9 mm, the autopsy should reveal that everyone killed or injured was done with a glock 9, otherwise the entire case falls apart. But I'm guessing the autopsy will be heavily redacted.
Originally posted by filosophia
HOW TO GET THE AUTOPSY REPORT:
Write to:
Attn: Records
Pima County Office Medical Examiner
2825 E District Street
Tucson, Arizona 85714
Check or money order $18 ($3 per report)
with a written statement saying "I am requesting the Autopsy Report for the Victims of the January 8, 2011 shooting"
(important): Leave contact Phone number and Address for reports to be mailed.
***********************************************************************************************
I think it's worth 18 bucks to see this information, and will be sending a check in the mail.
(I called the office for this information and they said that they can mail out of state. They said this information is not posted online and it is not likely that a media outlet will post this in full).edit on 7-3-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by Doomzilla
Yeah, UK, not sure if they'd send it there, maybe...but don't worry, I'm going to send a letter first thing tomorrow morning, hopefully it doesn't take 6-8 weeks, but probably a lot less, you can usually tell by the cost of the administration fee, if it costs $3 like this report it is usually fairly efficient, if it costs over 100 dollars then it's most likely inefficient and corrupt.
The mugshot was released because Judge Burns allowed the federal mugshot to be released, and the medical examine done in prison is something different, they will NOT release that to the public. However, these autopsy reports are the reports of the victims themselves (I'm assuming the type of bullet used, where the bullet lodged into the body, etc). It is Arizona law that these reports are made public, so even though both the prosecution and defense wanted them blocked, the law is on the side of keeping this information public.
Originally posted by miracleretiree
psalms 2-1 2-4
I honestly believe he was brainwashed by an alien through his tv.
Originally posted by miracleretiree
psalms 2-1 2-4
I honestly believe he was brainwashed by an alien through his tv.
Originally posted by Doomzilla
WHAT more do they need and why 2 years to actually START the trial let alone conclude it ?
Loughner's lead attorney, Judy Clarke, in a motion also filed Friday, asked that Burns not set a trial date until after the Justice Department made its decision on whether to seek the death penalty for Loughner, or in the alternative, to begin the trial in January 2013. Clarke wrote in her motion that because of the time "required to gain an understanding of the depths of Mr. Loughner's mental afflictions and their impact on his functioning in the world," she would not be ready to discuss capital-punishment issues with the government until June 1, 2012, a year after the time suggested by prosecutors.
Accordingly, Late Monday, the U.S. Attorney's Office asked the judge to issue an order placing Loughner in the custody of the U.S. Attorney General to send him to a federal facility where his psychological state can be evaluated. At issue will be whether Loughner is mentally competent to stand trial.
"The government is raising this issue now so that the issue of competency may be addressed at this time, to avoid any unnecessary delays in the proceedings," Anderson wrote in a motion.
It would still be highly optimistic to have a trial by September of this year.
Clarke quotes federal statistics that conferences between defense and federal prosecutors regarding death are usually held about a year after indictment, and trials take place more than two years after indictment.
In a capital case, after guilt is determined, whether by trial or plea, a jury must weigh aggravating and mitigating evidence to determine if the defendant deserves to die for his or her crimes.
Originally posted by filosophia
I made a thread about a recap of the Loughner story. I no there will be dissenters but we should get this information out to people, I know many will be interested.edit on 8-3-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)