It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Doomzilla
Still no pictures of her recovering , they go into in depth detail but still no photos , I havent seen any .
Good point. They don't need to show pictures of her bloodied but a simple smile and a wave should suffice. Is there any press release photo of her at all in a hospital bed or assisted walking? If not maybe cover up.
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by Doomzilla
It's amazing how many times they could have thrown the case out even before the trial starts. Mug shot that was photoshopped, a private video confiscated by the FBI, and a reenactment released, psychological evaluations "somehow" getting to the FBI, this is a kangaroo court.
So why would the FBI want those records? What could prison officials learn that the FBI couldn't? Amidst the endless possibilities, it must be that there is a mole in the prison system funneling money to the FBI. That would mean that the FBI is communicating with Loughner in some way via the psychological tests. Even though it brings up a motion of infringing on his rights, he's not a real suspect so he doesn't have to worry about that. The scandal will focus on what is inside these reports, but what they really will be is some type of clue as to what is really going on. However, that won't be disclosed for a while. Just like the video, the FBI is synonymous with cover-up. When the FBI steps in that is their primary responsibility, cover up the truth, cover up the crime scene, so that nothing can be investigated, all the "hard evidence" is locked away so the media can then plead plausible deniability to larger conspiracies behind the scenes.
Originally posted by filosophia
okay guys, I got the autopsy reports.
The bullets are being described as a medium caliber, fully yellow metal jacket.
No measurements are given
The autopsist arrived at the scene at 5:45 PM, almost 8 hours after the shooting. The deceased are described as FULL RIGOR MORTIS by the time they arrive. The shooting occurred at 10:10 AM, and ambulance was there by 10:20 according to this report.
azstarnet.com...
So that means that the ambulance arrived at the scene, took away Gabrielle Giffords, but left the six dead without even taking to the hospital! The FBI was on the scene when the autopsist arrived at the Shopping Center, not even at the hospital. Isn't that extremely unnerving? Did someone on the scene really make sure these people were dead and thus didn't need to take them to the hospital? What is even scarier is that many of the dead had gunshot wounds to the torso, causing internal bleeding. Could this have been prevented at the hospital? Possibly with an organ transplant even for the most serious cases, but otherwise recovering the wound?
I'm gonna make a new thread about this just to get other people involved.
Edit: they did take Christine Taylor Green away from the scene, but the other five bodies were left at the scene until 5:45 PM that night.
edit on 14-3-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Doomzilla
How they can have no measurements for the bullets ?
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by Doomzilla
So there is not one photo included in the autopsy reports, so you could say that aside from some signatures on computer paper, there is still no proof that anything at all happened at the safeway grocery store. No video, no photos of Giffords wounds, no photos included in the autopsy report, no camera phones, no 9/11 calls describing what happened, very little witness statements of the actual shooting spree, very little hard visual evidence of anything related to the official story. I'm not saying nothing happened but you have to wonder what kind of case, if any, they even have with zero visual evidence.