Holy Crud, I Found Nibiru.....

reply to post by topdog30


This just came out today. See they know for a fact somethings out there.
We just know they know more than that.

Originally posted by liejunkie01
If you really are John, that is awesome..lol...I won't hold my breath though....

Although I do not see eye to eye with you on alot of topics, I cannot debate your theory on the Niburu. I agree totally with you on this topic and wanted to tell you that.

S&F

edit on 13-2-2011 by liejunkie01 because: S&F

Good choice not to hold your breath. Not john.
Thanks for the kind words.

I must say, I did subscribe to this thread of yours.
Lets get our facts straight..(my vow to ATS)
I starred and flagged it but wasn't sure what else to add.
However it was a good read and should be mandatory reading for all members.
Thanks!

Originally posted by keepureye2thesky

Originally posted by freedish
We really need to start banning misleading thread titles...

I hope you realize you just wasted 30 seconds of my life. I'll never get it back.

You should alert a mod. Otherwise, why even post if it wasted your time.
That was your choice. You wasted 30 seconds and you're right, you'll never get it back. NEVER.

Don't even bother. Thanks though.
An explanation should not even be in order. Either way that have arrived here and their only comment is my style. My style is who I am. Don't like it? Shove off and tell a mod.

I didn't make them open anything. It was their own free will.

reply to post by randyvs


Tyche is an object that was proposed for a number of reasons. The probability of it existing is rather low. See this article.
Persistent Evidence of a Jovian Mass Solar Companion in the Oort Cloud

It is not Nemesis since it is not related to extinctions. That is stated in the article.

The important thing is that the exclusions do not restrict the existence of a new planet sized object in the solar system. The exclusions necessarily place such an object far, far away and it never ever enters the part of the solar system where the known planets orbit.

Originally posted by randyvs

Looking forward to April when we can learn more about this. Thanks for sharing.

The first tranche of data is to be released in April, and astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette think it will reveal Tyche within two years. "If it does, John and I will be doing cartwheels," Professor Whitmire said. "And that's not easy at our age."

Does this have it's own thread? Good find.

Originally posted by stereologist
Tyche is an object that was proposed for a number of reasons. The probability of it existing is rather low. See this article.
Persistent Evidence of a Jovian Mass Solar Companion in the Oort Cloud

It is not Nemesis since it is not related to extinctions. That is stated in the article.

The important thing is that the exclusions do not restrict the existence of a new planet sized object in the solar system. The exclusions necessarily place such an object far, far away and it never ever enters the part of the solar system where the known planets orbit.

Good find. Star.
Thanks.

reply to post by cluckerspud


What nibiru isn't real? Well who could have guessed that?.(note heavy doses of sarcasm)..anyone with a telescope and common sense? Lol
NASA said it wasn't real, so they "have" to be lying lol.

It seems even in them face of facts and logic, people still refuse to deny ignorance.
This will be the laughing tale of the century followed by 2012 hoax, people are just dumb, you midaswell believe in the tooth fairy, or santa or jesus, or a non corrupted political system lol

All make believe.

Originally posted by Anthony1138
What nibiru isn't real? Well who could have guessed that?.(note heavy doses of sarcasm)..anyone with a telescope and common sense? Lol

Not only that but f it was heading for earth now, it would be visible with the eye.
No telescopes required.

Originally posted by stereologist
A variety of ways show it does not exist.
1. Correct translations of the Sumerian texts do not indicate a planet

Doesn't Niburu just mean a crossing?
How did it turn into a planet?

reply to post by Anthony1138


Based on the way the OP conducts himself, I have no interest in anything further he has to say. Badly presented, overly biased, increasingly impolite. God forbid you offer an opinion of your own on such a thread. This was clearly posted for people who already blindly believe what you do. With the exception of a person or two who change their mind like their underwear, this topic clearly wasn't meant for actual discussion. You've seen to that.

On topic: Lots of hacks have called Sitchen's work bunk. When you can read/translate even a few words of the countless dead languages he mastered, I'll consider your point valid. Oh, wait. No, I won't. Because you come across like an arrogant, whining preteen. Anyone who disagrees with your opinion is wrong, but not because you can back up your claim. They're wrong because they didn't massage your (unearned) ego. Rather than arguing your point, you resort to personal attacks and rudeness. Being polite goes a long way. Now, I'd argue with you, but I've never been properly able to explain myself to a child.

Maybe someday you'll "get it." Good luck.

Nibiru means "Planet of the Crossing" in Sumerian, and it's due back around 2025, I think. Spud's interest is pure and valid, but any proof is quickly debunked or whisked away by NSA probably. I have no proof myself, but most planets of the solar system are changing in some way. Be this Nibiru coming around again, or something else.

www.skepticalscience.com...

Originally posted by thektotheg
reply to post by Anthony1138

 

Based on the way the OP conducts himself, I have no interest in anything further he has to say. Badly presented, overly biased, increasingly impolite. God forbid you offer an opinion of your own on such a thread. This was clearly posted for people who already blindly believe what you do. With the exception of a person or two who change their mind like their underwear, this topic clearly wasn't meant for actual discussion. You've seen to that.

On topic: Lots of hacks have called Sitchen's work bunk. When you can read/translate even a few words of the countless dead languages he mastered, I'll consider your point valid. Oh, wait. No, I won't. Because you come across like an arrogant, whining preteen. Anyone who disagrees with your opinion is wrong, but not because you can back up your claim. They're wrong because they didn't massage your (unearned) ego. Rather than arguing your point, you resort to personal attacks and rudeness. Being polite goes a long way. Now, I'd argue with you, but I've never been properly able to explain myself to a child.

Maybe someday you'll "get it." Good luck.

edit on 13-2-2011 by thektotheg because: error

edit on 13-2-2011 by thektotheg because: (no reason given)

Don't provoke him. Hahaha

Originally posted by thektotheg
Based on the way the OP conducts himself, I have no interest in anything further he has to say. Badly presented, overly biased, increasingly impolite. God forbid you offer an opinion of your own on such a thread. This was clearly posted for people who already blindly believe what you do. With the exception of a person or two who change their mind like their underwear, this topic clearly wasn't meant for actual discussion. You've seen to that.

On topic: Lots of hacks have called Sitchen's work bunk. When you can read/translate even a few words of the countless dead languages he mastered, I'll consider your point valid. Oh, wait. No, I won't. Because you come across like an arrogant, whining preteen. Anyone who disagrees with your opinion is wrong, but not because you can back up your claim. They're wrong because they didn't massage your (unearned) ego. Rather than arguing your point, you resort to personal attacks and rudeness. Being polite goes a long way. Now, I'd argue with you, but I've never been properly able to explain myself to a child.

Maybe someday you'll "get it." Good luck.

Thanks for your contribution. I wish you brought more to the table to discuss. I would be interested to know the hacks who called his work bunk. It could provide something useful for the other end of this debate. Have a great day! I feel you have completely misjudged me. Oh well. I respect your opinion.

Originally posted by SpaceJaxson
Don't provoke him. Hahaha

Whats funny is that I have been quite pleasant in my responses.
Not sure why I am the bad guy.
Of course my view is biased, IT'S MINE. Duh.

Have a great night, thanks for stopping by.

I mean, what were you trying to achieve with this?

I have witnessed many of the above question in this thread.... go check out all of his other posts in other forums and threads and you will have your answer.

Not that I support Sitchin's theories at all, I just don't believe this thread is of any use to anyone but Clucker's ego.

Originally posted by keepureye2thesky

Originally posted by freedish
We really need to start banning misleading thread titles...

I hope you realize you just wasted 30 seconds of my life. I'll never get it back.

You should alert a mod. Otherwise, why even post if it wasted your time.
That was your choice. You wasted 30 seconds and you're right, you'll never get it back. NEVER.

I will.
It wasted my time regardless if I post because I clicked on the stupid thread.
Yes it was my choice to post to let the nitwit who made the thread know that
he wasted mine and most people's time.
Yep, I'll never get it back. And the time I spent making this post too.

reply to post by cluckerspud

Couple of years are not necessary.It would be visible according to Keplers Law.

Ahh, c'mon Dude, are you really that Naive. Don't,t you know that they have massive mirrors between us and around the sun to hide whats really coming. Man you really need to pay attention.

The fact that anyone would believe some random dood "interpreting" old writings by far less advanced peoples, as he sees fit, over many actual experts (astronomers) who say its impossible, says alot about the sad state of "beliefs" when it comes to mankind. Gullible bunch we are.

reply to post by thektotheg

Lots of hacks have called Sitchen's work bunk. When you can read/translate even a few words of the countless dead languages he mastered, I'll consider your point valid.

An invalid point. Sitchin was clearly not able to correctly translate Sumerian. That is the issue.

Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by topdog30

 

This just came out today. See they know for a fact somethings out there.

Hey randyvs, that's an amazing find:

The hunt is on for a gas giant up to four times the mass of Jupiter thought to be lurking in the outer Oort Cloud, the most remote region of the solar system. The orbit of Tyche (pronounced ty-kee), would be 15,000 times farther from the Sun than the Earth's, and 375 times farther than Pluto's, which is why it hasn't been seen so far.

But scientists now believe the proof of its existence has already been gathered by a Nasa space telescope, Wise, and is just waiting to be analysed.

The first tranche of data is to be released in April, and astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette think it will reveal Tyche within two years.

Within two years, huh? Hey, what's the hurry?

Whether it would become the new ninth planet would be decided by the International Astronomical Union (IAU). The main argument against is that Tyche probably formed around another star and was later captured by the Sun's gravitational field. The IAU may choose to create a whole new category for Tyche, Professor Matese said.

In myth, Tyche was the good sister of Nemesis.

Nemesis of course is that "mythical" brown dwarf known as "The Destroyer", aka the "Death Star". Hmmm, sounds a lot like Nibiru, Planet X, Wormwood, Hercolubus, etc.

And what a coincidence -- NASA's actively searching for this "mythical" object:

Getting WISE about Nemesis

A dark object may be lurking near our solar system, occasionally kicking comets in our direction.

Nicknamed “Nemesis” or “The Death Star,” this undetected object could be a red or brown dwarf star, or an even darker presence several times the mass of Jupiter.

Why do scientists think something could be hidden beyond the edge of our solar system? Originally, Nemesis was suggested as a way to explain a cycle of mass extinctions on Earth.

Nemesis was the Greek goddess responsible for punishing human misconduct and arrogance (hubris).

Which would make it a perfect complement to the OP and his stereoscopic buddy!