It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Here’s the kicker; Sitchin’s original prediction of the appearance of Nibiru does not coincide with the 2012 date! According to Sitchin, Nibiru is not due to return until 2900! (Though he did say that the Annunaki might return by spaceship when the Age of Pisces moved to the Age of Aquarius sometime after 2090).
Originally posted by cluckerspud
(cont)..... to be a complete fabrication of the lunatic fringe community.
Zecharia Sitchin is not only a poor scholar, but his claims are scientifically bunk as shown here.
His original claim is that Nibiru will pass in 2090, NOT 2012. After 2012 gained a buzz and following it seemed his own prediction was tailored to fit this year.
Here’s the kicker; Sitchin’s original prediction of the appearance of Nibiru does not coincide with the 2012 date! According to Sitchin, Nibiru is not due to return until 2900! (Though he did say that the Annunaki might return by spaceship when the Age of Pisces moved to the Age of Aquarius sometime after 2090).
Source
Sitchin’s descriptions and research according to Keplars Law, prove that such a planet would be recognizable for a wide window of time with a powerful telescope. Thus it continues undetected. Naturally the only response could be, "It's invisible". How convenient.
Nibiru ala Kepler
Fact: such a planet as described by Sitchin would be detected by amateur astronomers.
Fact: it is not.
More info on debunked youtube videos here.
edit on 12-2-2011 by cluckerspud because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by leaualorin
Wait and see !
Originally posted by revmoofoo
Dude! Sitchin hasn't even been dead for a year yet and you're bashing him? A little respect for the dead goes a long way.
Nuff said.
Rev
Originally posted by revmoofoo
reply to post by cluckerspud
You said:
"Zecharia Sitchin is not only a poor scholar"
Now you are entitled to your own opinion of course, but where I come from, that comment is in poor taste. Then again, I'm not the Poor Test Police, so carry on. heh
Rev
ps I ain't your son either, again that comment is offensive where I come from...and usually leads to violence. That's what I get for living among scum. lol
edit on 12/2/2011 by revmoofoo because: To edit.
Fact: such a planet as described by Sitchin would be detected by amateur astronomers.
Fact: it is not.
Originally posted by CLPrime
Fact: such a planet as described by Sitchin would be detected by amateur astronomers.
Fact: it is not.
For the sake of completeness, I must say... there is that theory out there that Nibiru is a brown dwarf, which would make it (optically) invisible until it gets fairly close.
That being said, I agree with you. Nibiru is pseudoscience at its best. And I'm embarrassed to admit that I used to believe in it. In my defense, though, I was 12 at the time. Actually, that should probably tell you who this whole Nibiru thing is aimed at.
Originally posted by revmoofoo
reply to post by cluckerspud
You said:
"Zecharia Sitchin is not only a poor scholar..."
Now you are entitled to your own opinion of course, but where I come from, that comment is in poor taste. Then again, I'm not the Poor Test Police, so carry on. heh
Rev
ps I ain't your son either, again that comment is offensive where I come from...and usually leads to violence. That's what I get for living among scum. lol
edit on 12/2/2011 by revmoofoo because: Grammer
Originally posted by Farnhold
But still, we will see. I hope Nibiru will show up in couple of next years. It must be amazing to see a huge planet approaching and cloaking our sun.