It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RapturedNotBeamed
*grin* You can think of me what you want, but you're only acting the way you are because you know there is a chance you're wrong. It's pretty clear the way you have been handling yourself. You still haven't presented anything to me that holds any ground. You keep mixing scripture with your own doctrine, and they don't gel. You're angry at me as if it's my 'opinion', but I'm only talking scripture. If you've got a problem, it's with God. He wrote the bible, so take it up with Him.
Originally posted by RapturedNotBeamed
Yet again you insist on dodging the issues at hand and pointing fingers instead. This is what I am talking about.
Originally posted by gringoboy
Enough is enough....
Chill
Originally posted by gringoboy
The antichrist will be earthborn and exude all the charcteristics of yeshua,but my viewpoint is yeshua`s return is as he departed,thats why he states many will be decieved,look he is in the wilderness,look he is in the inner temple,where the carcass is the eagles(vultures) gather !
But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into.
For false messiahs* and false prophets will appear and produce great signs and omens, to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. 25Take note, I have told you beforehand. 26So, if they say to you, “Look! He is in the wilderness”, do not go out. If they say, “Look! He is in the inner rooms”, do not believe it. 27For as the lightning comes from the east and flashes as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.
28Wherever the corpse is, there the vultures will gather. The Coming of the Son of Man 29 ‘Immediately after the suffering of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven will be shaken. 30Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see “the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven” with power and great glory. 31And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. The Lesson of the Fig Tree 32 ‘From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near. 33So also, when you see all these things, you know that he* is near, at the very gates. 34Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place. 35Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. The Necessity for Watchfulness 36 ‘But about that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son,* but only the Father. 37For as the days of Noah were, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 38For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day Noah entered the ark, 39and they knew nothing until the flood came and swept them all away, so too will be the coming of the Son of Man. 40Then two will be in the field; one will be taken and one will be left. 41Two women will be grinding meal together; one will be taken and one will be left. 42Keep awake therefore, for you do not know on what day* your Lord is coming. 43But understand this: if the owner of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. 44Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an unexpected hour.
Originally posted by gringoboy
I agree with you as upon his return how can he associate with you if he does not see himself reflected inside.
But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into.
Source bible.cc...
Originally posted by
I KNOW God, and I am HIS servant
Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood
I think the issue here is Mr 'IAM's' understanding of what antichrist means. After all, that is the basis of his thread. Christ is a greek translation of Messiah or Moshiach, the 'Anointed One' of GOD. Outside of Judaism, Messiah has no precedent or meaning. It is through the Jewish covenant that GOD promised a saviour/redeemer for Israel and ultimately for the gentile nations. It is through Jesus/Yeshua that we Christians perceive (and hopefully receive) that redemption in a way the the Jewish people are currently blinded to. GOD's idea of redemption involved saving the very heart and nature of fallen man, who was utterly corrupt and unable to reach out to GOD. GOD reached out to man instead, and made a way for relationship to be restored between Creator and creation, just as Adam walked with GOD in the garden of Eden. Through the work of GOD and the atoning death of Christ on the cross, we have access to GOD through the blood of Jesus (as shadowed in the blood sacrifice offerings of the Old testament) and pure, real relationship with Him possible, because Christ dwells and lives in those who receive Him. Our walk in this life is a life of us learning to let go of the things in us that bind us, and allowing the fulness of Christ to grow richly in us and transform us. Our ultimate goal is to become like Him!
Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood
I have issues with your humanist philosophy though, your unbiblical concept of reincarnation, and your narrowed understanding of what 'antichrist' means. The world is looking and waiting for a redeemer to pull it out of the mire. The world chose to ignore the genuine. They will receive the counterfeit instead. For a time.
posted on 25-1-2011 @ 02:36 PM this post Originally posted by StarBoy You say Jesus died for our sins. No I didn't, you said this. Christ did not die for our sins, he died to demonstrate how NOT to Sin. Originally posted by StarBoy I say GOD is powerful enough not to sacrifice anyone for sins. Why would you even consider a perfect living creature like GOD to sacrifice a living creature like Jesus? Again, I never said this. Originally posted by StarBoy Oh and if Jesus died for our sins then does that mean if we dont sin then his death was useless? Yes i know we were born with sins, even though you cant name me one sin when i was born. Whoever said you are born with sin knows not what sin is. Sin is that which you do which harms another. You are not born with sin, but you learn to sin soon after birth.
Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood
posted on 25-1-2011 @ 02:36 PM this post Originally posted by StarBoy You say Jesus died for our sins. No I didn't, you said this. Christ did not die for our sins, he died to demonstrate how NOT to Sin. Originally posted by StarBoy I say GOD is powerful enough not to sacrifice anyone for sins. Why would you even consider a perfect living creature like GOD to sacrifice a living creature like Jesus? Again, I never said this. Originally posted by StarBoy Oh and if Jesus died for our sins then does that mean if we dont sin then his death was useless? Yes i know we were born with sins, even though you cant name me one sin when i was born. Whoever said you are born with sin knows not what sin is. Sin is that which you do which harms another. You are not born with sin, but you learn to sin soon after birth.
This is taken from your conversation with someone else in a previous thread.
It would seem that you deny the death of Christ as atonement for our sin. THIS is a major stumbling block for me in regards to calling you 'friend' or 'brother'.
Sin is a genetic predisposition,inherrant in all humanity through the disobedience of one man.
Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood
As for the issue of Elijah.....this is gonna be a long one.
The bible is not a western book written for western mindsets. There is a culture and mindset written into the Old Testament that presupposes you (the reader) are Jewish or at least understand what they are saying.
When Jesus refers to John as Elijah, He is using what is referred to as a Remez or 'hint'. I would encourage you to look this word up as it will help to explain a great deal of what jesus said, when we tend to interpret Him saying something else. Again, this is the curse of the arrogant western mindset which assumes Jesus went around speaking english and using everyday narratives that we would understand. Not so.
in fact, I would encourage you to look up the concept of PARDES, a rabbinical way of looking at and understanding what was written and the different levels of meaning beneath statements.
Anyway....When Jesus (to the best of my memory)said, 'For those of you who can accept it, 'This is Elijah who was to come', you can find a similar statement in the book of Luke when He says to the listeners (regarding John) 'What did you go out to see? (etc, etc....) I tell you, this is he of whom it was said "Behold, I send My messenger before your face, who will prepare Your way before You." (Luke 7:24-28) .
Jesus is quoting from the book of Malachiin that last statement. But He only hints at it, He doesn't quote all of it. The nature of a remez is a 'hint' or 'suggestion'. The listener takes on board the quote and recalls to mind the rest of that Torah portion (bearing in mind there were no bibles back then, only Torah portions and weekly readings that the listeners would consign to memory as they couldn't afford bibles/scriptures.
As people (even 'fishermen and shepherds') uneducated in life, they would be very familiar with the Law and word of GOD (more so than our generation), and be aware that Jesus was quoting from Malachi. And what Malachi scripture is He quoting from? Malachi 3. John the Baptist was calling Jesus the Messiah, and Jesus was (subtly) declaring John to be the messenger GOD promised to send before He sent His anointed. John carried the mantle of Elijah, one of turning the people back to their GOD in preparation of the arrival of the Messiah. Jesus was admitting that He was the Messiah the people had been waiting for.
Originally posted by Lucius DriftwoodDo I think children go to hell? According to Jewish tradition, a child does not become 'a man' (or woman) until the age of 13, when they engage in Bar or Bat Mitzvah. They have reached an age to discern good and evil and are therefore essentially accountable. Good job GOD is judge a weigher of the motives of our hearts and minds and not me. It takes a perfect righteousness to make a perfect judgement.
Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood
Anyway, I believe it is written that it is permitted once for all men (or flesh) to die and then face judgement.
No mention of a perpetual cycle of self improvement and correctitude. We all have one shot, we all have a level playing field (even if you don't see it as such), and we all are answerable to GOD for our life on this planet and our deisre to know/pursue/find Him. 'GOD is a rewarder of those that diligently seek Him'.
Christ was not a sacrifice as the friend I was talking to was refering to. He was not bled like a goat to appease God. He sacrificed himself to Man's judgement, that man would learn it is not his place to judge. Sins are imaginary labels made by man. God is all good and within each of us. We are to love each other, not find fault with God's work. The only Sin is to cast judgement. That is the only one you will be judged by.
Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood
Much as you choose to ignore the Olde testament, GOD chose David and referred to him as 'A man after GOD's own heart'. Even Jesus described Himself as being of David.
And what did David have to say on the issue of sin?
I think he wrote it perfectly in Psalm 51:5-6
Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin my mother conceived me.
Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood
Sin is the fundamental, universal issue that keeps us seperate from GOD, and it is not to do with judgement in the way you seem to perceive it.
And if you can discard the Old Testament so easily, where is the basis of you upholding the 'New Testament' so vehemently? It cannot stand without the foundation of the Old. And Jesus (referring to the law) said He came to fulfill it, not do away with it.
The law required innocent blood shed for the guilty.
I am concerned about where you are at in your grasp of 'following Jesus'.