It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by Unknown Soldier
That video you just posted only proves that the "object" when straight up and vertical. Wow you really found something interesting, as if we did not already know that the "object" when straight up.
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by Unknown Soldier
I have looked at your analysis, its very weak and shady.
I am following David Biedny's research and David Beidny calls this one (Not a Hoax) his experience in CGI is much more than yours.
First of all this is the first video I can think of were a real UFO accelerated from 0 to (blazing speed) guessing 10,000 and it was video taped on a cellphone.
Your using 3rd generation Youtube video and not original video
Your evidence for a hoax is soo weak I can't even put it into words.
To back up your claims "that this is hoax" you must provide more data than this.
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by esteay812
Their vessted interests are that "UFOs cannot be real" they have not seen one therefore they cannot exsist. When a solid UFO video like this one comes forward they are so concerned that it might be legitimate, as this one appears to be, that they over reach and point out irellevant artifacts that "IN THEIR OWN MIND's EYE" according to them is evidence.
In other words they are looking for something to satisfy their believe. This time their believe is "THIS IS A HOAX"
The "this is a hoax" crowd is just as bad as the " true believer crowd"
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by esteay812
Their vessted interests are that "UFOs cannot be real" they have not seen one therefore they cannot exsist.
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by Mr Mask
There are downsides to conducting all your research behind a computer, and thinking that is all you have to do. There is much more to investigation.
Originally posted by esteay812
reply to post by Paradigm2012
I am not a scholar or an expert in this particular field.
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by esteay812
The goal and purpose of this thread according to these above posts is to DEBUNK this, or prove its a hoax. Basically that is the tone of this thread, I disagree with that approach.
Originally posted by Mr Mask
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by Unknown Soldier
That video you just posted only proves that the "object" when straight up and vertical. Wow you really found something interesting, as if we did not already know that the "object" when straight up.
Sir if you think that is what the presentation really proves, I am very sorry for you.
Let me educate you further, since you failed to read the last post that painstakingly was written just for you.
I'll make it as simple as I can without dying of simplicity.
UFO goes straight-
Background moves-
UFO is part of field of vision and fixed in time and space with relevance to background-
UFO's visible path doesn't move with background as camera shakes but continues to go straight.ignoring the shake.
MEANING THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE for it to have been part of the observable scene unless it did a magic little jig to appear perfectly isync with the random jitter of camera.
Notice when everythig in the picture moves to the left? But not the UFO? That means its not part of the picture. It should move with the rest of the scene.
That is not open for debate or some theory. That is a hundred percent science and math and can not be argued.
The end.
Do you get that?
Let me gues...no?
I'm shocked...no really...tell David I hope he makes a little cash off this hoax before everyone involved is busted and dragged into the mud.
Ok Dave? I mean...Dude?
MM
edit on 5-2-2011 by Mr Mask because: (no reason given)edit on 5-2-2011 by Mr Mask
because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by esteay812
The goal and purpose of this thread according to these above posts is to DEBUNK this, or prove its a hoax. Basically that is the tone of this thread, I disagree with that approach.
I am responding to the frantic attempts to debunk it.
So far the evidence of a HOAX is very very weak.
Originally posted by aemetta
Thanks MM for explanation. So the interpretation is - the UFO is not composited on the picture! Or did I misinterpreted the other way?
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
reply to post by esteay812
The goal and purpose of this thread according to these above posts is to DEBUNK this, or prove its a hoax. Basically that is the tone of this thread, I disagree with that approach.
I am responding to the frantic attempts to debunk it.
So far the evidence of a HOAX is very very weak.
Originally posted by Shades1035
About the third video that is so obvious fake.
Since it's so extremely bad so that even stupid people can see it's fake and also the fact that it is this video that is shown on mainstream media, such as ABC and others, doesn't that show that there is a clear disinfo campaign against the original videos? Why would they bother with this disinfo if the original videos are fake?