It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Originally posted by karl 12
Originally posted by Pimander
That's why there have been whistleblowing, leaked and declassified documents etc.
Well, there's certainly been quite a number of declassified documents mate - some of them describing very peculiar objects indeed - Richard Dolan lists a few below but there are plenty more out there.
Twelve Government Documents That Take UFOs Seriously
Thanks for this link and the one in your last post buddy.
After reading most of it in your link above, which is very interesting indeed, I checked out some of his other articles and fond this one, “UFOs are Real. So Now What?”
keyholepublishing.com...
Richard stated in this article the following quite remarkable points.
I post at the same time my personal views and opinions about them.
That UFOs are real.
That’s of which I am convinced of.
That some them are alien.
That’s of which I am convinced of.
That some of them are classified military projects.
That’s of which I am convinced of.
That there is an extreme and extensive secrecy involved from our military but apparently also from the aliens themselves.
The first part is already clear to me, the second part seems very logic to me.
The intentions of these "aliens" are still not definitively known.
I agree.
They may be our space brothers, or we may be in their cookbook, or they may simply like the water here.
I think that we have to deal at least with the first two options here, in the sense that some are benevolent to us for some reason or even some special connection we have with them, but not all.
Originally posted by karl 12
Hey my friend, sorry for the delay in the response
Originally posted by karl 12
here's an admittedly vague attempt at his questionnaire.
That UFOs are real.
Yes.
That some them are alien.
I don't know but I suspect some of them 'aren't us' - there are a lot of theories about the true nature of UFOs from 'inter-terrestrial' and 'extra terrestrial' right through to 'inter-dimensional' - if I'm being honest I don't have the foggiest idea what's going on.
That some of them are classified military projects.
Yes.
That there is an extreme and extensive secrecy involved from our military but apparently also from the aliens themselves.
See point 2
The intentions of these "aliens" are still not definitively known.
See point 2
They may be our space brothers, or we may be in their cookbook, or they may simply like the water here.
See point 2 - although there are certainly a lot of 'water collection' reports.
It is a shame that Sanderson, a biologist by profession, wrote only two books on UFOs. It is a greater shame that he is all but forgotten today. His first book, Uninvited Visitors (1967) remains among the most sophisticated analyses yet done on the possible nature of UFOs (Sanderson called them Unexplained Aerial Objects, or UAOs).
Too long to summarize here, Sanderson methodically asked, not what UAOs were, but what they could be. He developed a six page outline of the possibilities. Thus, they could be inanimate or animate. If inanimate, they might be natural, or artificial, each possibility with several subsets. If animate, they could also be natural or artificial. Natural forms might include life-forms indigenous to space, or to atmospheres, or to solid bodies. Artificial forms might be domesticated natural life-forms, genetically created life forms, or biochemically created life forms. And so on.
Sanderson at several points suggested the possibility that the "occupants" of UFOs might be artificial life forms. He was not dogmatic about this, and also entertained the idea that they might be an as-yet unknown life-form indigenous to Earth. Still, the concept of UFOs as a form of artificial intelligence is fertile enough that we might have expected some follow-up.
After all, it’s been 35 years.
link
Originally posted by karl 12
reply to post by spacevisitor
Spacevisitor, thanks for the reply mate and as I'm sure you're aware from all your great research on the USO thread, there certainly exists some incredibly strange reports out there –
I think even if a person just looks through the police UFO reports then it's pretty obvious that something is going on -it's just what that something is.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Thanks for that link to the interesting info of Sanderson, and you know what my friend, I just did buy that book Uninvited Visitors at a second hand bookstore in Holland.
I did look for an e-book of it, but could not find one; instead I stumbled on this bookstore.
It’s the 1st edition from 1967
Is that not great?
It kinda looks like he read or talked to someone and got pissed off and turned his video camera on in the middle of the night and went off on a tangent.I hope he is right about this being disclosed soon the subject of ufos is on the verge of ridiculous at this point.Its not a matter if they are here more like why they're here or what do they want?
Originally posted by tinkytink1207
I saw this yesterday and thought it was interesting. Kinda like a little UFO commercial," Hey remember we are here."
When did he tape this vid? Anyone know? Just wondered if was something old or something new he has just put out there??
LIVE at the 6th Annual X-Conference, held in 2010, Historian Richard Dolan presents an analysis of the patterns of UFO secrecy since the 1940s. Focusing on the national security aspects of the UFO phenomenon, Dolan explains how it was a key factor in the creation of the U.S. "black budget," and hence a subversion of the traditional American political system.
Therefore, the rationale for the alleged study was to make it appear to be focused on the personal psychology and sociological aspects of witnesses and UFO groups, to inflame their indignation, while conspicuously avoiding the physical reality of UFOs or the technology observed by witnesses.
Related post