It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by inforeal
How many of these threads do we need?
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
I'd say Hitler's speeches incited violence, with his Brownshirts hanging on every word of it.
reply to post by arbitrarygeneraiist
Isn't there something like 300 years worth of oil there too, or am I thinking of a different area? I read or heard somewhere that those fields were meant to be reserves in a time of emergency. I know it was meant to be interpreted as a military emergency for military purposes, but the US is in its own state of emergency as far as I can tell.
Originally posted by inforeal
No one for one minute believes that the assassin went out and shot those people for Sarah Plain’s causes.
That’s not the issue at all. The issue simply is her violent rhetoric can and may have connected with a man who is mentally unstable; and it can happen again.
It doesn’t matter whether this assassin was a left winger, right winger or apolitical, it is his mental state that is the question and famous people who use inflammatory rhetoric like Palin can affect all kinds of people and particularly the mentally deranged.
I’m happy she finally has the sense to take down that rhetoric about reloading and putting human beings she doesn’t agree with in crosshairs.
I don’t believe a logical sane follower of Palin would ever assassinate anyone.
But if one has the ear of millions of people as Palin does then she should have the sense to refrain from such rhetoric, but she obviously doesn’t.
Of course now she takes down the site that has those inflammatory words toward democrats. That alone is an admission that it was wrong and immoral to do in the first place.
Its not just him that is mental,its sarah and the whole tea party,so expect alot more things like that from those type of people.
Originally posted by inforeal
No one for one minute believes that the assassin went out and shot those people for Sarah Plain’s causes.
That’s not the issue at all. The issue simply is her violent rhetoric can and may have connected with a man who is mentally unstable; and it can happen again.
It doesn’t matter whether this assassin was a left winger, right winger or apolitical, it is his mental state that is the question and famous people who use inflammatory rhetoric like Palin can affect all kinds of people and particularly the mentally deranged.
I’m happy she finally has the sense to take down that rhetoric about reloading and putting human beings she doesn’t agree with in crosshairs.
I don’t believe a logical sane follower of Palin would ever assassinate anyone.
But if one has the ear of millions of people as Palin does then she should have the sense to refrain from such rhetoric, but she obviously doesn’t.
Of course now she takes down the site that has those inflammatory words toward democrats. That alone is an admission that it was wrong and immoral to do in the first place.
Originally posted by inforeal
reply to post by mydarkpassenger
Didn’t you read the post? I said may have caused it. I also said is doesn’t matter because the guy may be nuts and anyone who causes an atmosphere of violent talk may have contributed to the guy’s mental deterioration.