It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
Originally posted by SaturnFX
reply to post by SaturnFX
Depends on the need...if your starving and wont make it even a few more days, you eat the bird and eggs
But, if its not a complete emergency, you eat the bird and raise the chicks for food and breeding if possible.
Only if you only plan to eat for one day. If you want sustainable meals you eat the eggs. The adult can and will lay more within a few weeks to replace what you took if the weather is good. If you kill the mother and "try" to raise the eggs you will have killed of not just one hatch but most likely the whole batch. The eggs must be kept at a specific temperature and humidity for a specific number of days, the eggs gently turned twice a day, and let me tell you... feeding new born chicks is a pain if they aren't hatched with feathers, eyes open and on their feet! If you made it that far most would still die.
The idea behind survival is sustainable survival. What good does it do to outlast your fellow man if you kill off your food supply? Country people already know this. You never take more than is absolutely necessary, you give back to nature to repair/replace what you've taken, and you never destroy the sustainability of the future.
That's why you need us.
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
reply to post by CastleMadeOfSand
Actually, city people outnumber country people immensely, and are the ones who keep voting for the "safety" laws that are putting us in this situation. I know of no country person who would trade their freedom for safety and try as we might our smaller votes can't undo what your larger number of votes have done.
Originally posted by 1SawSomeThings
reply to post by CastleMadeOfSand
No goodbye, just join the positive thinking. Please search the thread backward in time. Thanks.
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
reply to post by CastleMadeOfSand
Agreed, lets keep politics out of this.
Yes, if those evacuating the cities came to us to learn how to live out here it would be a win win situation. Mostly I read how they'll over run those already here, blow them away and take what they want. That type of thinking is what prompted this thread. That type of action would ensure more hardship than need be. We can grow food enough to share, but only if we're alive to do it and the ground isn't raped and ruined.
Originally posted by NeverApologize
reply to post by xX aFTeRm4Th Xx
I ALWAYS, tell the truth.
Look me up. G.F**o*
Stationed at the following:
- Bentwaters, UK
- Woodbridge, UK
- Spangalim, GER
- Offutt AFB, NB
- Witchita Falls, TX
Again, I will survive, LOL. I think I will be OK. City Slicker who appears to be a Halo Fan and War movie Fan. Go back to your fantasy land and TRULY Prepare. I will GLADLY assist you in the events to come! GLADLY...
Originally posted by Mr Tranny
reply to post by xX aFTeRm4Th Xx
One of the golden rules is never become overconfident. (ie) Full of yourself.
And never brag.
Originally posted by mamabeth
reply to post by xX aFTeRm4Th Xx
I am a 55 year old grandma with minor arthritis.
I can also stop someone with a gun and I do
make kill shots everytime,head and chest.
I am also a proud member of the USCCA!
Originally posted by zcflint05
I can see the OP's point. While I don't have the funds to purchase any land currently if I were to "bug out" rest assured that my survival skills and ability to subsist off the land along with the things I bring along would make me valuable to others. Like I would HAVE to be. If SHTF it is not going to be a good idea to go around killing people just so you feel like some post-apocalyptic badass. Let me let you in on something:
if we are in a SHTF scenario going it completely alone will not be wise. Being in a large group "village" type numbers around 40-50 people with varying strengths in different fields (doctors teachers farmers etc) to have a productive and comfortable life trying to rebuild the world. Going off on a shooting rampage because you feel like you've waited for an apocalypse will NOT work because you're going to make alot more enemies than friends. Going onto someone's land and stealing food is WRONG and that's true before or after the SHTF. For the most part in our world smart and good people figure out a way to subsist. Stealing and murdering because you like "Fallout 3" will get your head blown off quickly.
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
reply to post by CastleMadeOfSand
Agreed, lets keep politics out of this.
Yes, if those evacuating the cities came to us to learn how to live out here it would be a win win situation. Mostly I read how they'll over run those already here, blow them away and take what they want. That type of thinking is what prompted this thread. That type of action would ensure more hardship than need be. We can grow food enough to share, but only if we're alive to do it and the ground isn't raped and ruined.
Originally posted by Dachende
reply to post by SeenMyShare
It is this moronic type of thinking that will probably get us into trouble in the first place.
I know for sure, I'll be opening my doors when TSHTF to anyone who needs it.
If the SHTF many of us already in the country/hills/boonies will not take kindly to a bunch of city folk pouring in and squatting on our farmlands, in our woods, and on our mountains acting as if they have the right to be there..
Don't think that those of us already in the rural locations will welcome you with open arms. Its nearly as dangerous for bug outers in the wilds as it will be in the cities, except in the wilds you'll be faced with folk who know how to live there, know the area well, and will in most cases use deadly force to protect it.