It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Can you demonstrate these "irrelevancies"? Can you explain why you think my explanations are irrelevant, despite the fact that I was explaining subjects related to matter-antimatter annihilation for further clarification and understanding? Your assertions are completely irrelevant to mine because you can't demonstrate them and you're merely relying on opinions instead of validating your claims. Like I said, spare the arrogance for another time. If you want to be an ***hole about it, do so somewhere else where somebody else will actually put up with it.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Condemned0625
reply to post by buddhasystem
Yes, which is what I meant. A steady stream of photons. The sun is the example that emits photons. Just because I made a grammatical error doesn't mean I was lying.
You obviously don't know or fail to mention the controlled experiments in laboratories that involved containing super hot plasma with magnetism and I wasn't just talking about quark-gluon plasma in particular.
Hmm, so you mentioned
a) UV which is irrelevant for Lazar allegations
b) quark-gluon plasma that is equally irrelevant
c) magnetic containment irrelevant to (b)
And you never did answer the question of how the protons in the lab differ from protons elsewhere. That is because you can't, and you try fog and mirrors like (a), (b) and (c). I'm afraid you are out of buzzwords, and there is not much else available to you in terms of education.
And now you are trying to pass THAT for a grammatical error:
It isn't necessarily protons bombarding us, but rather photons from ultraviolet radiation emitted by the sun.
Puh-leeze.
Originally posted by LDragonFire
This video was posted Nov.20, 2010, but I do think it's a older video.
In the video Bob Lazar tells us about S4 a secret bunker and hanger research facility located south of Area 51. He claims that we have 9 Alien spacecraft, and until 1979 aliens helped us in the research at this base.
Question 1 Bob says the aliens left in 1979. What happened in 79 to make them want to leave?
He claims that he worked on the propulsion system of the alien craft. He claims the craft is powered by anti mater devices that power gravitational wave generators. These generators are able to bend space time to make interstellar spaceflight possible.
He claims the aliens are the classic gray aliens.
At 34:00 in the video he starts telling us about the aliens and where they came from, and at around 36:00 he tells us that these aliens have altered human genetics 65 times.
Is he at least hinting that Sitchin could be right on the money? At least about his claim of alien altering our DNA? Or aliens Creating us?
Anyway I liked the video, and I felt he did a good job explaining the science and how the technology works.
YouTubeedit on 4-1-2011 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Condemned0625
reply to post by buddhasystem
Sure, you work at the LHC. I'd like to see some identification or credentials before I believe such a coincidence. You don't seem to know as much as you're supposed to.
Originally posted by redrezo
It's also just as bad to make such claims as 'I have a phd' and 'I work at the LHC', while providing zero evidence like Bob Lazar and expecting people to swallow it.
Ah, another huge misunderstanding on your part. When I was talking about how proton collisions in nature differ from proton collisions in a lab, I was explaining how laboratory collisions are directed precisely towards the nuclei of other particles, whereas the particles in nature here on Earth don't do that. If there were particle annihilations going on all around us like the ones in the LHC, you can only wonder how different this environment would be. Pimander cleared that up earlier as well, didn't he? As for the plasma, yes it is contained in a magnetic field in order to prevent it from contacting the inside wall of a container, otherwise it will cool down immediately. If you still think that the containment of plasma in magnetic fields is a myth, then I don't know what else to tell you. You're obviously missing out on the other official experiments that you're not involved in. Must I provide links to prove something that is obvious? Fine, here you go.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
After encountering a few freaks who made threats on my life (on a different board) I started taking privacy mode seriously. The best credentials are abilities to actually discuss physics beyond a potpourri of pop science trivia like "they use magnetic field to contain plasma". If you don't think that "protons in nature are different from protons in the lab" sounds idiotic, well then, good luck.
If you want to believe that spaghetti monster inhabit the hollow earth, so be it.
Originally posted by Condemned0625
Ah, another huge misunderstanding on your part.
When I was talking about how proton collisions in nature differ from proton collisions in a lab, I was explaining how laboratory collisions are directed precisely towards the nuclei of other particles
If there were particle annihilations going on all around us like the ones in the LHC
As for the plasma, yes it is contained in a magnetic field in order to prevent it from contacting the inside wall of a container, otherwise it will cool down immediately. If you still think that the containment of plasma in magnetic fields is a myth, then I don't know what else to tell you