It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But yeah...the reality is, that you're weak and scared of reality
Originally posted by BAZ752
Originally posted by Kailassa
I watched this to prove he was crying, because I know how crying people can make odd faces.
But instead, it convinved me he's a conman who was overrating himself.
At 2.56 there is a huge grin on the guy's face.
His eyes show an expression of triumph, as if he's thinking how clever he is to be fooling everyone.
If I may, Kailassa, what I'm more intrigued to know, as I have put to the OP, is what qualifies you to declare with absolution that ''his eyes show an expression of triumph'', how can you possibly know that from looking at this video? The problem with responses like yours, is that you make a statement and within that statement you leave little or no room for open discussion, or at least an opportunity to challenge your views. I wouldn't be so quick to call you out on your post if you had put something like ''in my opinion'', because afterall, you're entitled to that and then we'd all be aware that it is your opinion.
Originally posted by destination now
reply to post by Kailassa
But he didn't fool anyone...He was convicted of double murder and sentenced to life imprisonment...
Sorry, but he is crying, not laughing, whilst I cannot say whether his tears are genuine, whether he is crying because of the horror of the images, or because he knows he has been caught and with all of the evidence against him will most certainly be found guilty. But he is definitley crying.
In August 2008, Entwistle had been tricked into shaving his head in an attempt to secure the protection of a white supremacist prison gang.[13] Instead of giving Entwistle protection the gang had reportedly said "It’s a nice gesture on your part but we're gonna kill you".[14] Entwistle was put into protective custody inside the prison shortly afterwards.
Originally posted by GypsK
First of all, this case is two years old.
His name is Neil Entwistle and yes, in the end of the trial he was found guilty by a jury. But it took a long period of investigation into the murders where there where both people who thought he did it and those who still to this day believe he didn't commit the murders. There where pro and con witnesses in the courtroom.
THAT is why, imo, lawyers should defend anyone untill they are proven guilty... no matter what the lawyer himself thinks of the case. It's their job to defend the accused and everyone deserves a propper defense (innocent untill proven guilty... in some cases we should be thankful for that)
Second, he is crying. This was actually the first time during the entire trial that he showed any emotion.
(if you turn up the volume real loud you can even hear him snoart and sniffer)
The guy has his own wiki page
en.wikipedia.org...
and even a fan page
www.entwistlemurdertrial.com...
again, to bad that we get a vid, a broken link and no background info on the story... again, to bad that peoples minds go wondering without checking facts before drifting into fantasy...
Show me a real video about a convict laughing over pictures of his victims and I might change my mind about the lawyers who defend them.
Originally posted by GypsK
reply to post by Seventytwo
There will always be stories like this one on ATS... something you can't avoid when so many people attend a website
I was really more surprised that it went on 4 pages and no one looked up the case yet, it only took a 2 min google to find the guy and the case. (lucky that's something I learned from some respected members here on ats as well, always look for the source and at the source before forming an opinion)
Originally posted by dude69
reply to post by BAZ752
Anybody who looks at this and goes...ouh...the poor guy is crying...is delusional.
Originally posted by andyhello23
reply to post by BAZ752
All i am saying is what a bunch of hypocrites.
How many here would laugh at a homeless man in the cold?
I bet alot.
Thats my point. Yep the geezer was bad and that but worse is the hypocrites people are to say that he is any different than a large percentage of humans.