Pedophilia Guide Author Arrested

Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by Sinnthia

 

wow.. No personal attack..

I was using ignorance as it is defined. Not a personal attack..

I pointed out the things he said to point out or lend credence to my opinion, that he has done more than write a book.

Unless any of those videos include a confession, you are judging based on pretty flimsy evidence. It would never hold up in court and quite frankly I would not vote for you for world sherrif since you are so fond of rape.

I think we are going to find out that he does not define sexual molestation of a child to be the same act as he has committed. He dances around the word use. He has touched children ... but not sexually.. He pauses and smirks when he says it..

When "we" find that out, let me know. I will be more than happy to condemn him for any acts he has actually comitted towards a child. I never once said anything to the contrary. I just refuse, unlike you, to make a complete decision about what he has done based on some videos of some things he has said NOT including any kind of confession of having done said things. Why do you not get that?

Can't I comment on my opinion of his guilt and or truthfulness?

edit on 12/22/2010 by Resurrectio because: (no reason given)

Commenting is one thing. You have decided he is guilty of a crime you have no evidence he comitted and asked that he be raped and killed for it. If that is something you can be proud of, good for you.

Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by xkyorix

 

That logic is flawed.. You say you are sure it is for publicity?

If you found out that member Resurrectio was the officer doing the arrest.. Would you think I did it for publicity?

Do you know this officer? What makes you think he did it for publicity?

But you know the author of this book has raped children for a fact because...............................

ATS is my favorite place for irony.

Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by xkyorix

 

That logic is flawed.. You say you are sure it is for publicity?

If you found out that member Resurrectio was the officer doing the arrest.. Would you think I did it for publicity?

Do you know this officer? What makes you think he did it for publicity?

How is it flawed? Oh, because I stated it in fact? You mean like

Again... I am sitting back and waiting for the victims to come out of the woodwork.. There is no way that this monster has been able to keep his mits to himself.

Anyway...

Well, if you did it I don't think you'd want the publicity so you can find a way to get him killed in prison.

Secondly, have you seen the facebook page? You'd think they'd arrested John Dillinger.

Thirdly, they had no jurisdiction in Colorado.. Obviously there are child molesters in Florida. It's not like they're the most rare occurrence this side of the galaxy.

There was also a posted from the county who states about how much he likes to make himself look like a hero. I believe the word he used was "god."

reply to post by Sinnthia


I am sorry.. Next time I will larger type and use bold.. My apologies for the confusion.. That was meant to be a response to another poster..

Oh wait... I looked and that was not directed to you. It was directed to the correct person..

No worries.. Everyone makes mistakes.

Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by mirageofdeceit

 

Well, call someone and have me locked up.. I will not change my view on this.. I do not want to kill him because he wrote a book. I want him dead because he is giving detailed information, that's only purpose is to harm children..

Is it?

Again... I am sitting back and waiting for the victims to come out of the woodwork.. There is no way that this monster has been able to keep his mits to himself.

Just because someone writes a book doesn't mean there are victims. That would put every crime writer under suspicion. Did they commit the crimes they write about?

The only time I'd start looking at links between books and the author is when there is a certain writing style involved, or the book was written after a well-known investigation.

The best example is OJ Simpson, and his book "If I Did It". Very odd indeed.

reply to post by Resurrectio


I don't think she made a mistake. She was just trying to point out the irony of the pot calling the kettle black.

This thread should be closed.

So many people arguing about the content of a book that they have clearly never read. It is even clearer that they have not even read the back cover because they do not have the slightest clue what it is even about.

Unfortunately the totalitarians have already destroyed everything you could use to debate this topic. Suffice to say they annihilated the only thing that could prove them wrong (which is mandatory, because their argument sucks).

Closing this thread could also be called Denying Ignorance.

Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by Sinnthia

 

I am sorry.. Next time I will larger type and use bold.. My apologies for the confusion.. That was meant to be a response to another poster..

Oh wait... I looked and that was not directed to you. It was directed to the correct person..

No worries.. Everyone makes mistakes.

Um....what?
You really seem to have a thing for me. I have no clue what this post is addressing. When I click on what you replied to, it is a response to you to a response to me. The only other thing it can be is the post I wrote to you on a forum because I had something to say about a post you wrote to someone else.

Care to explain or can you maybe focus on someone else, or the topic, or anything other than me for just a bit?

reply to post by xkyorix


Oh of course..very very wrong. I'm not agreeing in any way shape or form. I just whanna point out that Pope Palpatine is starting to side with the molesting priests that's all.

reply to post by Sinnthia


I am done here.. I am the only one with my opinion.. So you guys can constructively discuss this without feeling that you need to point out the flaws in my opinions.

I really wrote that thinking I replied to the wrong person. My bad.

This is going nowhere. I am out.

We can all agree, this has gotten out of hand. We don't nor will we agree on this. I am not leaving in anger or frustration... There just really isn't anything more to say about this.

I hope everyone has a good day.. 3 days till x-mas.. Merry Christmas everyone!

I wonder what would happen..

If someone published a book on
The lies of governments told
That the Holocaust was a lie
That Black people were never subjected to abuse nor enslaved
That the "N" word used for black people and its history was a load of crap .
And that historical evidence says Mohamed ( peace be upon him ) was a pedophile

I wonder what would happen...yet someone writes a book about child abuse and all the leftist apologists come out to protect!!..their amendmant..whatever that is!!

reply to post by Resurrectio


You are not the only one mate..I am well behind you....these people will learn in the future...if they live long enough!!..

Just stand back and watch ..as everything gors down the pan...and these people that so want to protect the rights of scumbags ...have the crap on their doorstep..then they will squeal, and cry..this world is a # place ..and in reality there are predators..and they are many..these people will ultimately become victims...because they are blind to the true reality of human nature!!....

I am adding you as a friend...any foes..go for it !! lol...I will then know who you are !!lol

Let someone write a book about killing a black president of the USA...go into the minutae of planning and reasons...like just because he is black and our white supremesist views...give plenty of information as to why and how..publish and advertise it for sale then send it to the Whitehouse..wonder how that would go down in the good old US of A...but at the end of the day..its only a book !!lol

Ive always said that the west only has three more taboos to break in the name of liberalism/lifestyle and that and that is pedophilia, cannibalism and bestiality.Seems two out of three is becoming more mainline these days.

We have no honor,and this is our shame.

So by the looks of the site registration date, "JoeMaine" is nothing more than contrarian troll not worthy of a response...

reply to post by shuck


Chances are you would see the same people out there defending the right to write that book as well. I know I would.

reply to post by Xiamara

That's kind of stupid. Once you say this that or the other thing trumps the right to free speech it's only a matter of time until cricising your government or your banker is under that category.

You can't pick and choose who gets free speech and who doesn't. The very nature of free speech is that it is free, regardless of who wrote it, or who it offends.

If you are going to pick and choose, then you end up in the crazy situation we are in now.

Originally posted by Byteman
reply to post by Phenomium

 

The guy isn't "known as a pedophile", so your diatribe failed before it even started.

Unless you care to share the details of the trial in which he was convicted of child-sex.

He just hasn't gotten caught yet. You only have to have half of a brain to put 2 and 2 together. If he writes a whole book supporting and defending pedophiles, he must know alot about it. I mean, come on. If he's not a pedophile then how is it that he feels he has enough experience to give all other pedophiles in the world advice on how to do it properly? Before one can be a teacher,...you must first be a student. Otherwise, he would know nothing to write about in his book. Quite frankly, he just has that same creepy vibe that they all seem to have.

The cartoon on adult swim called "The Venture Brothers" has a character who is the ventures bodyguard in season 4 called Seargent Hatred. The Seargent Hatred character takes medication to help ease the cravings he has for young boys. Should this character be banned or the creators of the character or the people of the cartoon network be arrested for transmitting seargent hatred across state lines?

Sure it's poor taste in the extreme, but who specifically was hurt by the character being transmitted?

Unfortunatley, the same goes for the writing of this book. It does not injur anyone directly.