It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by Kharron
Are you saying as humans we are too simple to be able to differentiate between different situations? Why does it have to be black and white? Why can't laws be specific to protect our kids? A small minded person will try and blanket existing and all future "ideas" under one umbrella.
As an advanced species...we better start proving it.. And start protecting our most valuable asset- Our Children.
I would kill this man myself, if given the chance.edit on 12/20/2010 by Resurrectio because: (no reason given)
Florida is not prosecuting him for writing the book.. they are prosecuting him for distributing obscene material.
Originally posted by Gazrok
First off, this guy is sick, and obviously practiced / practices what he preaches in his book.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
We all agree that this book is evil at best.
He thinks that children can make sexual choices ..
All of you that keep jumping on the 1st amendment bandwagon are admitting that we are too stupid, and to damn lazy to protect our children properly.
Did anyone notice the poster that called me a child abuser, simply for having kids... He then went on to call me a serial killer, simply because my children will one day die.
Originally posted by Gazrok
That's just it though, the book (unbelievable as it may be) doesn't fit the criteria of the law, as it is only text, and to be covered by that law, pictures have to be involved. (as I understand it, though I may be wrong, but that's what I've seen articles mention). So, he's going to get out on this.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by dannyfal
Point/match...
Poor use of anger. I'll admit that.. I should know by now, that I am unable to discuss this issue and keep my composure.
I digress.... Nope, can't help it.. I really would love to hurt this guy.. I would pay my price for it.... But, it would make me feel so much better...
Originally posted by Xiamara
Now of those there C is definitely a yes so he is guilty of aiding a pedophile now is that innocent?
The Florida law uses the word "depictions", not pictures. I think that's what they're going to prosecute on, claiming that "depictions" can be verbal. So if he "paints a picture" with words, it could be called a depiction.