It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by babybunnies
I'm not a climate change denier, I'm a "mankind causes climate change" denier.
However, you mention that climate change deniers cherry pick through the articles, when in fact, climate change supports heavily cherry pick through the articles and skew the data to show what they want.
In the 1970's, there were several documentaries made about global cooling, using data from the 1950's and 1960's showing that the Earth was going into a cooling trend. NONE of those documentaries can be found online, but there were several, made by good sources such as Panorama etc.
Now, all of the same data presented by climate change scientists mysteriously shows that the Earth was warming over that period, not cooling. I'm not denying that these scientists are wrong OR right, just trying to show that the data can be easily skewed to the needs of those presenting it.
Climate change supporters, especially those who used to be known as "global warming" supporters, are very big on using "all the available data on record" showing climate change happening since about the 1850's. However, they are ignoring billions of years of data available in mud and ice core samples showing that this is an ongoing cycle.
12,000 years ago, the ice age ended, apparently quite suddenly. Ice shelfs collapsed around the world, sea levels rose drastically, likely contributing to stories about a massive flood that probably was the inspiration for the story of Noah in the Bible. What caused the ice to melt? A global temperature increase ......
Mankind was certainly not around on the planet in large enough numbers to impact the climate for that event, nor for the hundreds (maybe thousands) of ice ages that preceeded this.
People who get bored are a 'stay away' signal, a strong one. Your wife is lucky you left her.
Originally posted by The_Liberator
Originally posted by Frogs
reply to post by The_Liberator
Here is the part that I'm honestly not following. I've read your OP and you have so much going on in your life right now and much of its bad I don't see how some people on an internet message board disagreeing (or agreeing) with your views on climate change are of the same level of importance in your life as whats going on with your wife?
I'm sure there will still be people who agree and disagree with you on climate change here when you get what's going on in your life sorted out.
I am sitting at my father's house with nothing to do, so I'm posting here, lol.
It's not that this thread has the same importance as my life, of course it doesn't. But I'm not used to being single, and frankly I'm just kind of sitting around being bored
Originally posted by starless and bible black
reply to post by The_Liberator
How might she catch you? Here at ats? Simply look for the pop up that bears your name on the monitor, saying 'welcome back'.
Originally posted by The_Liberator
Originally posted by babybunnies
I'm not a climate change denier, I'm a "mankind causes climate change" denier.
However, you mention that climate change deniers cherry pick through the articles, when in fact, climate change supports heavily cherry pick through the articles and skew the data to show what they want.
In the 1970's, there were several documentaries made about global cooling, using data from the 1950's and 1960's showing that the Earth was going into a cooling trend. NONE of those documentaries can be found online, but there were several, made by good sources such as Panorama etc.
Now, all of the same data presented by climate change scientists mysteriously shows that the Earth was warming over that period, not cooling. I'm not denying that these scientists are wrong OR right, just trying to show that the data can be easily skewed to the needs of those presenting it.
Climate change supporters, especially those who used to be known as "global warming" supporters, are very big on using "all the available data on record" showing climate change happening since about the 1850's. However, they are ignoring billions of years of data available in mud and ice core samples showing that this is an ongoing cycle.
12,000 years ago, the ice age ended, apparently quite suddenly. Ice shelfs collapsed around the world, sea levels rose drastically, likely contributing to stories about a massive flood that probably was the inspiration for the story of Noah in the Bible. What caused the ice to melt? A global temperature increase ......
Mankind was certainly not around on the planet in large enough numbers to impact the climate for that event, nor for the hundreds (maybe thousands) of ice ages that preceeded this.
There was a short period during which scientists saw a drop in temps and concluded that MAYBE particulate from emissions could block out enough sunlight to cause an ice age.
The scientists soon realized that this was not the case and that was the end of that.
Yes the earth has gone through ice ages and warm periods, but that is not what we are talking about. We are talking about what is happening NOW.
The Arctic is melting at a rate not seen for thousands of years, the permafrost is venting methane at a rate not seen for thousands of years, and the oceans are acidifying at a rate not seen for thousands or hundreds of thousands of years.
And all of the above is as a direct result of our CO2 emissions.
Those are facts.
So what is your point?edit on 20-12-2010 by The_Liberator because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nerbot
I think any man who packs his bags and walks out on his son has serious problems.
Poor kid, and all because you can't hack it. Another messed up kid to add to the messed up future of the human race. Thanks!
Shouldn't you be asking yourself "did "I" make a mistake and marry the wrong woman"?
Originally posted by DaRAGE
First thing's first. Didn't you have and know and put up with this stuff before you were married?
Second thing: How did you put up with it for so long?
Thirdly: Didn't you know this was going to happen?
Fourthly: Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, no matter how hard you try and convince them of what you consider truths. They may think you're the lunatic and can't see the truth. See below...
Can i just say that global warming is occurring on all planets in our solar system. It might not be the sun, but it IS occurring on ALL planets within our solar system.
But YES i do agree that CO2 is a greenhouse gas which warms the atmosphere. I do agree that more and more greenhouse gases are getting released, including methane from permafrosts and the ocean. Yes I also believe that the ocean is saturated with CO2, and it is bad. We are polluting our atmosphere with pollution and our oceans with pollution also. Yes we must do something about this pollution. But i'm not sure we must reduce our carbon emissions via some tax where the money will go no-where except into the governments hands to use on some other thing whilst only spending a little bit of that tax trying to reduce the carbon footprint, sort of like the money for speeding fines are meant to be put back into the construction of roads and safer roads at that, but does not, and instead is used for other things the councils or government needs. I'm not ready to support a carbon tax, that will reduce our economy and increase unemployment. I believe the world has cycles of warming and cycles of ice-ages.edit on 20-12-2010 by DaRAGE because: (no reason given)
I have studied the topic of global warming almost obsessively for 2 years now and I know more about the topic than I care to admit
Originally posted by The_Liberator
I am hoping to get custody. But thanks for the support! (not)
I married a crazy person. Sue me.