It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by type0civ
You need help
I guess I'm wanna those, "its the sun" people.
Glad we're not married. lol.
Lesson from the past: present insolation minimum holds potential for glacial inception (2007)
"Because the intensities of the 397 ka BP and present insolation minima are very similar, we conclude that under natural boundary conditions the present insolation minimum holds the potential to terminate the Holocene interglacial. Our findings support the Ruddiman hypothesis [Ruddiman, W., 2003. The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Era began thousands of years ago. Climate Change 61, 261–293], which proposes that early anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission prevented the inception of a glacial that would otherwise already have started...."
Temperature and precipitation history of the Arctic
"..Solar energy reached a summer maximum (9% higher than at present) ca 11 ka ago and has been decreasing since then, primarily in response to the precession of the equinoxes. The extra energy elevated early Holocene summer temperatures throughout the Arctic 1-3° C above 20th century averages, enough to completely melt many small glaciers throughout the Arctic, although the Greenland Ice Sheet was only slightly smaller than at present...
As summer solar energy decreased in the second half of the Holocene, glaciers reestablished or advanced, sea ice expanded, and the flow of warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Ocean diminished. Late Holocene cooling reached its nadir during the Little Ice Age (about 1250-1850 AD), when sun-blocking volcanic eruptions and perhaps other causes added to the orbital cooling, allowing most Arctic glaciers to reach their maximum Holocene extent..."
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by The_Liberator
wait just a minute little boy ... YOU picked up and left and she's the demon ??? yeah sure.
Originally posted by Honor93
Liberator, it's easy to see that you refuse to attempt to debate facts so i'll go with the obvious. You stated (yes we have a son, together) ... my question for you, little man is this: just what 'personality type' commits to a NSD sufferer, creates another life and then walks away with some sense of misplaced indignation ?? in my country, they are called, cowards.
Originally posted by The_Liberator
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by The_Liberator
nice of you to ignore the basic fact that pre-industrial measurements Include massive greenery coverage throughout the world, which filter CO2 and other toxins; which are produced naturally in wider variety and amounts than man has collectively produced in all his existence.
Yes, man contributes to the toxification of the planet with every fart, every breadth, every discharge and most consumption ... however, man created and performed deforestation ... put it back ... man pollutes continuously, unchecked, unpunished and undeterred ... fix it ... man kills, man corrupts, man coerces ... shouldn't we concentrate on fixing what we can, first ?? Leave nature to the Mother, she knows best.
We aren't fixing it and were an't going to.
You think the solution is to simply put the forests "back". As in what? Plant a bunch of seeds and stop cutting down the existing forests? Then in 50 years hope that our seeds have grown into trees? Are you being serious?
Originally posted by CerBeRus666
reply to post by The_Liberator
I'm really happy for your wife. I'm sure that now she can finally find happiness, and a fulfilling life, away from demagogues, and fanatics, such as yourself.
I am also sure your post is misleading, incorrect, and a big lie. It should read: "My wife just left me, because I'm a fanatic, incapable of having a debate with people that don't share my Dogmas".
Originally posted by Frogs
reply to post by The_Liberator
Here is the part that I'm honestly not following. I've read your OP and you have so much going on in your life right now and much of its bad I don't see how some people on an internet message board disagreeing (or agreeing) with your views on climate change are of the same level of importance in your life as whats going on with your wife?
I'm sure there will still be people who agree and disagree with you on climate change here when you get what's going on in your life sorted out.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by The_Liberator
am i being serious ?? in some ways, sure ... should we have already done such with even a percentage of those removed, we'd be in far better shape today than we are. Why not do something other than complain?
Originally posted by rusty moon
You should write a tv show about the arguments you and your wife had..
oh wait.. you must not watch tv or is that rule just for the baby