It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by DIDtm
You havent watched your own videos enough have you? You keep staking your beliefs on the supposition that if the plane was 150 feet away from where the NTSB said it was (based on the FDR) then the "official story" is a lie. "Oh gee, the plane that hit the Pentagon was over HERE instead of THERE" It must be a lie.
Doesnt change that the plane was still Flight 77, the plane was still a hijack, and that the plane still hit the Pentagon....but keep hanging your hat on the flight path
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by DIDtm
You havent watched your own videos enough have you? You keep staking your beliefs on the supposition that if the plane was 150 feet away from where the NTSB said it was (based on the FDR) then the "official story" is a lie. "Oh gee, the plane that hit the Pentagon was over HERE instead of THERE" It must be a lie.
Doesnt change that the plane was still Flight 77, the plane was still a hijack, and that the plane still hit the Pentagon....but keep hanging your hat on the flight path
Are you having doubts about the official story yet...Sure seems like your beliefs differ from it.
Originally posted by xweaponx
Just watched the episode and WOW! All I can say is there are some pretty interesting facts. What are your opinions ladies and gents?
Here is a summery of the complete episode in my words:
Fact 1: Donald Rumsfield 09/10/01 speaks about 2.3 trillion dollars coming up missing from tax payers. Anything with that much money would launch a HIGH scale investigation
Fact 2: 09/11/01 Plane, Missile, Bomb hits pentagon in the computer network in the financial division completely knocking out all the computers that kept record of the 2.3 trillion dollars, and no investigation could be done since well....the computers are gone.
Fact 3: Cell phone calls could not be placed on a plane that was so high up and the plane had NO equipped backseat phones.
Fact 4: A highly surveillance building having over 100 security camera on the outside and only ONE camera caught the "plane, missile, bomb" hit the building....
I think there is more to what the government is saying. Plus where and what happened to 2.3 trillion dollars? That is a LOT of money to go missing and no trail to where it went since the trail has been blown up....
edit on 17-12-2010 by xweaponx because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by misfitofscience
Full episode here!
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by DIDtm
If you accept that AA 77 was within yards of the Pentagon on 9/11 it is hard to see how you can reach any other conclusion but that it crashed into it.
Are you a supporter of CIT ? Their theory has gained no traction in years and they seem to be widely viewed as disinfo agents.
Their witnesses, those able to see, unanimously say the plane hit the Pentagon . They have'nt found a single one who saw it fly over.
....please at least watch the episode...
1....Why is the hole in the Pentagon only 16 feet in diameter.....Would not the wings and engines at least cause some exterior damage, instead of just folding in....going through the 16 foot hole?
2......Why was the testimony of the gentleman...(Mannetta?) taken out of the official report..When the plane was within 10 miles.....he asked Cheney if the stand-down order was still in effect....and Cheney said yes? Why would the Air Force be asked to stand down?? Doesn't make any sense.
3....Why is the only video released... one that does not show a plane....but if one goes frame by frame...a small pointed object...that looks no more than a couple of feet in diameter....is seen....barely entering the frame?
Originally posted by DIDtm
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by DIDtm
If you accept that AA 77 was within yards of the Pentagon on 9/11 it is hard to see how you can reach any other conclusion but that it crashed into it.
Are you a supporter of CIT ? Their theory has gained no traction in years and they seem to be widely viewed as disinfo agents.
Their witnesses, those able to see, unanimously say the plane hit the Pentagon . They have'nt found a single one who saw it fly over.
Im not a stern believer of anything. Especially not the OS.
I have questions and wonder why so many people saw something different than what would coincide with the 9/11 report/NIST.
I wonder why so many testimonies were left out of the 9/11 report. I wonder why some such witness's were never investigated or interviewed, when the Commission knew of them.
And regarding your post, of which I quoted above; yes, there was an eyewitness that saw a plane fly over/around the Pentagon.
I would post the video but it has been posted several times before in other threads by me, as well as other people. Of course, he gets ignored by believers when posted.
Originally posted by Alfie1
If you mean Roosevelt Roberts he did not see a p[lane fly over the Pentagon. And, even if he did, he would be unique.
Their witnesses, those able to see, unanimously say the plane hit the Pentagon . They have'nt found a single one who saw it fly over.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Sorry you still don't understand the effects of that sort of lens, that is used by that camera, and the "false perspective" that makes things appear smaller than they actually are. You CAN research that, on some photography websites, if you wish to try...you may learn something......OR, if you can afford it, buy some equipment, and see for yourself.
edit on 20 December 2010 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by TheWatcher11
Why do you suppose ALL possible video evidence would have been collected?? Any reason you can think of, when they conduct an investigation, to determine all the facts they can?
BTW...the term "confiscated" is used, intentionally it seems, by the "conspiracy" sites in order to innuendo-drop.
ALL "tapes", and other video recordings, were returned.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Well, first....EVERY case is different.
Usually, when I see the "16-foot hole" mentioned, it includes a shot of the hole in the inner ring wall....the EXIT hole where some debris punched through. The actual outer facade breach was about 75 feet wide.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by TheWatcher11
There were relatively few cameras actually pointed at the Pentagon that day. If you cannot comprehend that fact, then its useless to talk to you about it. The FBI, in the interest of being thorough snagged all the tapes from all the businesses around to see if there were ANY views that might show anything.....and they didn't.
Originally posted by zeta55
reply to post by weedwhacker
Thanks for responding. I am new to this. I have not 1,000th the knowledge of what may have really happened that terrible day.
To tell you the truth....I never really had a reason to question the Official Version. Only after reading and viewing what some have questioned, have I started to have a lot of questions myself.
I quess I stayed away from injesting information about all of this, because to me it is sickening. No matter how...or why..or who knew what...and when. It was, and still is a sickening day for Our Country.
I found this video to be enlightening......The first 4 minutes are concerning Flight 93......Then info on flight 77 begins...and with some good music...I might add.......I'll keep listening...looking...and thinking...Maybe someday we can find peace in our hearts, and minds.
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by autowrench
And as many times as it has been pointed out (on this thread) that there was never 2.3 trillion DOLLARS missing......people on this thread keep latching onto that lie.