It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
That's what he said, take it or leave it. Makes you wonder where the Twilight books come from.
I'm going to leave it, but before I do I do want to say something in regards to Twilight...the author is Mormon.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Ad-hominem attack...
No, just a question you don't seem to want to answer.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
It could have been a lucid dream.
Brought upon by a coc aine high?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
The Scottish Rite is.
But not the Rites of Memphis-Mizraim.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
You know what I meant.
I'm all about accuracy so as not to paint a picture for someone who doesn't know the difference.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
He doesn't claim that he was ever Worshipful Master, but it seems like he memorized the ritual.
Well the top of the York Rite doesn't stop at State level, it goes to national levels and international levels. So being at the top of the York Rite meant he was head of General Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons International, General Grand Council of Cryptic Masons International, or the Grand Encampment, Knights Templar, USA. And if he was a man of the ritual did he get invited to the York Rite College or any of the other invitation only bodies within the York Rite?
As to the Scottish Rite, what title did he attain there? KCCH? 33rd?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
He also held Scottish Rite degrees.
Just because he claims to be a member of both doesn't mean he was or that it means the Rites of Memphis-Mizraim are legitimate because the Scottish Rite is.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Why is that?
Because he is lying to you.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Masonry claims to be derived from fertility cults.
You don't need to look further than the Masonic temples adorned with ancient Egyptian non-Christian symbols.
Not all Masonic Lodges are adorned with Egyptian symbols. Freemasonry, in the York Rite, is filled with Christan symbolism.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Jack the Ripper was a Freemason.
This point is illustrated in the movie From Hell. The details of some of the murders are available on the Internet. Schnoebelen echoed a conspiracy theory published by Stephen Knight that all of the murder victims knew of a wedding between Prince Albert Victor and a Roman Catholic woman named Annie Crook. Of course, people who attempt to "debunk" this conspiracy theory also explain away Jack the Ripper as a deranged solitary lunatic. The editors of the Wikipedia page for Stephen Knight found it fitting to mention that he developed a brain tumor.
No one knows who exactly Jack the Ripper was.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
George Washington was not a committed Freemason.
Schnoebelen explains that Washington only became a Freemason because it was required of high-ranking officers in the British army. It is true that after retiring from his presidency he told of his fear of Illuminism being imported to America. However, he used the word "Jacobin," not "Illuminati."
5. Didn't George Washington renounce Freemasonry?
No.
George Washington remained a member of the Craft from his initiation into the Lodge at Fredericksburg, Virginia No. 4 on November 4, 1752 until the day he died on December 14, 1799, when he then, at his widow’s request, received a masonic funeral. George Washington’s papers are available online at memory.loc.gov/ammem/gwhtml/gwhome.html
This hoax got its start in 1837 with the publication of a tract by Joseph Ritner, Governor of Pennsylvania. Although easily debunked, it was reprinted by E. A. Cook & Co., Chicago, in 1877, shortly after Prof. Charles Albert Blanchard (1848-1925), a founder and first lecturer of the National Christian Association published a rewriting of the same story entitled Was Washington a Freemason?
SOURCE
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Ronald Reagan was a Freemason.
As far as I know, he was an honorary Shriner. If he became a Shriner despite not being raised a Master Mason, then it is obvious that the Freemasons don't care as much about "going by the book" as manipulating the political machine.
Ronald Reagan was never a Freemason.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Freemasonry has an inner circle.
Bill says that, yes, there are Masons who don't know the secret. The ones who do either have "hereditary bloodline or preparation," already come to Masonry with an occult background, or are perceived as being wealthy, powerful or of the right "temperament." They are taught Jesuit meditation and mind control techniques, Tantric yoga, formulas for making hallucinogens, and "archaeometry," which Bill described as "occult Masonry." He defines archaeometry as building temples that are suitable for habitation by demon spirits.
Bill says a lot that is untrue. This is one of them.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
So what? Maybe you're envious?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
By accuracy you mean characterizing all conspiracy theories are drug-addicted lunatics?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
You'd have to ask him.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Now you're taking what I said out of context.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
How do you know this for sure?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
And invicible knights, apparently.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
But people do know that he wrote "The Juwes are the men who will be blamed for nothing."
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
This is a straw-man argument.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
How did he become a Shriner?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
How do you know?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Why is that?
Because he is lying to you.
How do you know this for sure?
Originally posted by KSigMason
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
So what? Maybe you're envious?
Yes, I'm jealous of a addict who claims to see aliens, drink blood, and belong to fake Masonic bodies.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
By accuracy you mean characterizing all conspiracy theories are drug-addicted lunatics?
No I wanted accuracy, but I only label those have claimed they are coc aine-addicted, blood drinking lunatics.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
You'd have to ask him.
I thought you knew his life story?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Now you're taking what I said out of context.
Maybe, but I was also want to make it a point that Memphis-Mizraim is not a recognized body, and it makes Bill fairy tale pretty unreliable.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
But people do know that he wrote "The Juwes are the men who will be blamed for nothing."
So?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
This is a straw-man argument.
No, my post showed that your post was incorrect. Just because my post blew your theory out of the water doesn't make it a straw man argument.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
How did he become a Shriner?
He was only a honorary Shriner and, also, a honorary Scottish Rite Mason. He had no actual membership or perks of membership; no voice or ability to visit private meetings. He also received a certificate of honor from the Grand Lodge of Washington DC. Also note that neither the Shrine or the Scottish Rite can confer the title of "Freemason" on anyone, that authority is still left to the Blue Lodge.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
How do you know?
Because I'm a member.
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Why is that?
Because he is lying to you.
How do you know this for sure?
He claimed to be a blood drinking vampire. A vampire.
If that isn't enough for you to at the very least, question his ethics, they you deserve to buy his story hook line and sinker. Make sure you ask him for a volume discount when you buy his books and videos. I think it's 10% off.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Bill was also a member of the Scottish and York Rites.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
But people do know that he wrote "The Juwes are the men who will be blamed for nothing."
Interestingly, contrary to some reports, this statement has absolutely nothing to do with Freemasonry.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
You need to go back and actually read what you wrote. I said that George Washington wasn't a committed Freemason.
George Washington served three terms as Master of his Lodge, and laid the cornerstone of the Capitol Building in a Masonic ceremony. If that's not a "committed Freemason", I don't know what one is.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
So, then, the Scottish Rite conferred a phony title onto Ronald Reagan.
No. The title was "honorary", not "phony". An "honorary" member is not an actual member. It's just a way to recognize someone's service to the nation. It didn't grant him membership in the fraternity, and didn't allow him to attend Masonic meetings.edit on 4-2-2011 by Masonic Light because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Why is that?
Because he is lying to you.
How do you know this for sure?
He claimed to be a blood drinking vampire. A vampire.
If that isn't enough for you to at the very least, question his ethics, they you deserve to buy his story hook line and sinker. Make sure you ask him for a volume discount when you buy his books and videos. I think it's 10% off.
I've known sanguinary and psychic vampires in real life. They exist. Maybe you should get out more.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by kallisti36
no, my problem is being a roman catholic, a mason, a hard core satanist, and a vampire all at the same time. I just keep thinking conflict of interest.
I thought you were looking for a discussion so I will bow out as you have your mind made up.
Bill explained in his videos that he pursued the path of Satanism because he wanted to be "like Christ" and he thought that Satan and Jesus were 2 halves of the same person, like the Freemasons claim.
The problems with the Jesters are fairly well documented, even without Bill's testimony.
Originally posted by Ga522
Oh, I didn't see anyone else mention that Bill Schoebelen supposedly knew Shriners who belonged to a "sub" group called the "Jesters" who were particularly ravenous, in the carnal sense. He even made accusations toward them raping one fellows wife in a group fashion.