Is this a real alien picture? And what about this Roswell EBE footage?

The second video, it's very well done. I just get the feeling watching it that someone tried too hard to make it look 'old'. It just looks too 'clean', if that makes any sense. The picture looks fake to me. Couldn't say what the last one is.

reply to post by ReVoLuTiOn76


The first video is from the 1995 Ray Santilli film 'Alien Autopsy'.

en.wikipedia.org...

TJ

reply to post by Project-Sign

It just looks too 'clean', if that makes any sense

Again. It is a remastered copy. This is why so "clean"

reply to post by RUSSO


I saw that first picture in a book. Apparently it was proven to be a shaven monkey.

reply to post by tommyjo

The first video is from the 1995 Ray Santilli film 'Alien Autopsy'

Yes. All the story that they made up was because this alleged real footage.

reply to post by annella


The footage is from 'Alien Autopsy' from 1995. The film makers have made millions out of it and admitted they faked the footage.

Lots of people were involved in the hoax and it was all filmed in England.



www.outtahear.com...

en.wikipedia.org...

TJ

reply to post by typwar




Shaven monkey? Really?



Wow, shaved monkeys seems to atract agents and people.

reply to post by tommyjo


Nope.

Not the same footage.

Originally posted by RUSSO
The picture i found im my HD. I downloaded this a many years ago and did not save the description.

Does anyone have any information about it?

Is it a real deal?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/fb576b5b9a18.jpg[/atsimg]


Any thoughts about this material?

Thanks in advance

edit on 19-11-2010 by RUSSO because: Modify title

Well, what i know about the first picture is what is detailed in one of the articles in the Canadian UFO Research (CUFOR) and that allegedly someone there sent two letters to the FBI to determine their authenticity, of course, the FBI denied knowing none of the photo in question or that these people were agents of them.

ths is the article with the pic:




What it says is that the photo was of a deceased man named Carl O'Dell, who gave it to Gordon Beatty and he sold it to Mladen Grohovac.
There are many stories about the picture but Allan's Moonchart, of Salem, Oregon, that once published the photograph, said the being in picture is a crewmember of a flying saucer that crashed near Mexico City in 1952.

Thats all about that material

reply to post by zaper


Thank you.

Star for you.

In the first image the 'alien' has got the look of a chimpanzee to me, something about the legs and arm length are making me think chimp

reply to post by RUSSO


Sorry, but Ray Santilli couldn't even be honest about what he initially hoaxed. After the outing he then turns round and claims that the segment is the real deal. Sorry, but many don't buy it. Although many were gullible enough to line his pockets with millions. He was laughing all the way to the bank.

Far too many similarities in that video segment to the dummy used in the hoax. The producer even admits how they had to mock up damage to the dummy leg in order to cover up a dodgy part of the 'alien'. The butcher had to put some meat into the dummy leg and thus the wound was created by accident. Easy, easy footage to replicate, spin it and laugh all the way to the bank.

Someone thoughts on the footage at the following.

lucianarchy.proboards.com...

TJ

reply to post by Versa


Seems that you are not the only one to believe that this is a monkey.

To me, this is far from being a monkey.

Originally posted by ReVoLuTiOn76
I think that these might just be the real deal. I am no expert in video analysis, so I hope somebody comes along who is, to examine that first video, the one of Roswell. That one in particular is very interesting to me.

i agree...there were many officers around the alien, it looked totally unscripted. the camera person had a hard time even getting a shot, because everyone else was pumped up by what they were viewing, and were moving about excitedly blocking the camera,....it just has an aura of authenticity to it.

Not sure about the picture or the 2nd video, but the Andes videos seem fake to me.

The figure almost seem to look like it was partly made with paper mache.

And why would they release 3 short videos that don't really show any substantial details?
Don't you think if someone had real videos, that they would release all or most of the info at once instead of risking governement agents tracking them down before the rest was released?

Actually... the first pic is a young alien hybrid and one of the ladies in the back is the mother... lol.
If you really look at it though, it seems like a poor sketch.
Someone probably somehow erased a chimp and sketched in an alien.

reply to post by RUSSO


i saw the roswell one in the warner brothers movie "alien autopsy" a comedy based on the alien autopsy hoax. in the movie it was used to portray the REAL alien autopsy footage discovered toward the end of the movie, after the hoax from the fake alien autopsy footage was found out. i don't know if warner brothers made it or if they just grabbed it from somewhere else, but just forwarning. cause i'm sure a company as big as that could make a pretty damn convincing hoax.

The first image is just one of the Alien fakes doing the rounds at the time. Seriously guys and girls do you honestly think that first image is authentic?

forgetomori.com...

forgetomori.com...

TJ

Originally posted by RUSSO
reply to post by tommyjo

 

Nope.

Not the same footage.

Where did I say that it was the same footage? It is from the same film. The same film that Santilli hoaxed to make millions out the naive and gullible. Hands up all the gullible who lined his pockets?

TJ

reply to post by tommyjo

If you have an old movie which is in a poor condition than give it to some experts who are good in restoring it. Or present the movie to the public like it is. Why trying to refilm it? That makes no sense to me. Something stinks here.

The fim was damaged.

Until the 1950s, the film industry made use of nitrate film, both for filming and for screening copies. The compound used in the manufacture of celluloid film, known as nitrocellulose, is highly flammable.

Needless to say, for the preservationists, dealing with the recovery of material from nitrate film is like messing with a fuse of gunpowder! Moreover, the tendency of nitrate to react with oxygen in the air to form nitric acid (HNO3), which helps to erode what is left of the film.