LA Plane Theory is blown out of the sky - US missed Chinese Missile

Originally posted by Tribble
OK, so if it's a missile, why is it so slow.
It would have to have a high arch, if it was a super slow flying missile- this flies more or less level.

geez, not again
read the thread bro.
I am not posting it 3 times
no offense

Originally posted by williamAmerican
There is a number of things this could be

edit on 15-11-2010 by williamAmerican because: (no reason given)

Yes there is a number of things it could be.

1) Contrail
2) Missile
3) UFO in trouble
4) Genetically modified flying fish
5) Someone lit a match to close to the streak while he was farting.
6) Its just a figment of our imaginations, and its just a strange looking cloud.

Gods honest truth, I would take any of them for an answer, even though the scariest of them all would be the fish.

reply to post by boondock-saint


Oh year tell them its the super slow style missile that the Chinese have. Ya'll can't prove the Chinese don't have slow missiles can you? My cousin said it came from an Iraqi sub that actually got stolen by Osama Bin Laden and he is shooting the same missile that they shot the pentagon with. He also predicted that he will shoot another off in Florida and New York and is going to pop his sub up right in the middle of a Carrier group. Can you believe it a Carrier group! He did it while Obama was out of the country because actually they are the same person you guys just didn't know it. I don't have any pictures but I can paste my messenger logs with my cousin.

Originally posted by BobAthome
Bingo----> thats the plume colour,,---> remeber tech analysis said wasn't right color for amer. missle they were right.

lol
but of course Phage will say
there is no evidence here
Just pure speculation

lol

If bush was still president and this was a missile and china did it .....Just think of Iraq lol


There would be a world war

as far as the gov denying the missile theory,
this is NOT the first time the gov has covered up
a Chinese missile launch.

in 2007

www.nytimes.com...

reply to post by boondock-saint

The cameraman described it as coming from beyond the horizon. It is the actually the narrator who says "he stayed on it for ten minutes".
www.cbsnews.com...

reply to post by boondock-saint


It would take hours to read this thread
I scanned some pages, but.. could put a link to the reply?

I am sure this has been asked before were there any other boats in the area such as fishing boats or pleasure boats that could have seen this launch from another angle since it covered such a long distance? Another question if the U.S. thought and detected this Chinese missile as hostile was there an alert and if not why not? Were jets scrambled for surveillance or sub locaters to see if any other threat was in the area? ^Y^

reply to post by pmbhuntress


Here are my suggestions to the collective of what you just posted

1) You can't hold a serious conversation
2) Your humor masks a more serious problem
3) Ignorance prevents you from contributing to the topic

If you're going to say something, make it remotely intelligent

reply to post by boondock-saint


I was trying to move into a more civil territory, but your plain ignoring of a second possible solution or lack of acknowledgement that I said something has led me to believe that i need to do some more debunking.

Originally posted by amari
I am sure this has been asked before were there any other boats in the area such as fishing boats or pleasure boats that could have seen this launch from another angle since it covered such a long distance? Another question if the U.S. thought and detected this Chinese missile as hostile was there an alert and if not why not? Were jets scrambled for surveillance or sub locaters to see if any other threat was in the area? ^Y^

I don't really know the answer to that
but I would assume national security
protocols would have kicked in and if
any footage or pics or eyewitnesses
had evidence it would have been
confiscated by the authorities just
like the camera footage at the pentacon
on 9/11. So best wishes trying to get
any additional data.

The real people who know
are not talking at present.

Originally posted by Tribble
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

It would take hours to read this thread
I scanned some pages, but.. could put a link to the reply?

u r asking me to do
ur work for u?

no thanks, it's there
just read


Mod Note: Netspeak is frowned upon on ATS. Please read the following: www.abovetopsecret.com...

OK, so what is this thing, missile or contrail??
We have been told there were two planes that could have made a contrail in roughly this area..
US Flight 808 has been ruled out, all though it was the prime target for two days, because it turns out to have already well over LA at the time of the sighting..

That leaves UPS Flight 902 which had a similar flight plan but about 30 minutes later..
Many are saying this is now the plane that created the contrail (cause it's the only choice left) and have offered the following picture as proof..
www.cargolaw.com...
This picture was taken by a web cam situated a LAX, it is date stamped 18:15 but on reading there was an apparent error and it had not been altered for daylight savings or something like that..
So the actual time of this pic was 17:15 or 5:15pm..
The time is important because at that time Flight 902 was known to be 160 miles off the coast.
For some perspective and don't hold me to the foot

LAX field is 126' above sea level..
I'm not sure where the web cam is so lets assume the highest point, the air tower..
The air tower is 277' tall...
So the web cam at max is say 400' above sea level...
That would give a visible horizon of around 25 miles..

Now look at that pic again..Notice where the contrail starts in relation to the horizon..Its a little dark but not hard to work out where the horizon would be...

Now, if this is really Flight 902 then the plane at the tip of that contrail must be 140 miles past that horizon..Thats over 160 miles as you see it..

Maybe its just me but I say it's much much closer than that...
Also at 160 miles away )which is a fact, not theory) that must be on huge contrail especially at the base...

So, anyone still think it's UPS Flight 902 ????

reply to post by boondock-saint


I question your methods of approach on a news article? Do you just read the article and take it at face value and only choose the facts you want? I've noticed that you've disproved theories on one news article and on another new article take what they give you. I'm asking more of how you go about sifting through the trash and use only reliable sources and what makes those sources reliable.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

The cameraman described it as coming from beyond the horizon. It is the actually the narrator who says "he stayed on it for ten minutes".
www.cbsnews.com...

edit on 11/15/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)

Ohh, so the cameraman never said that..You know you should check you facts before sprouting them as proof Phage..

reply to post by Xterrain


I am leaning more and more the way you're thinking too. I too think this reeks of false flag-ism. To test us. To gather psyche-information on how we're reacting. To have us looking left while the jugglers are tossing something to the right....etc

I don't believe this was a plane. I just can't wrap my mind around the fact that this isn't reported/mistaken more often (and yes, even to news station who are dying due to the Internet) and for the life of me, I just can't comprehend how no expert knew, in a nanosecond (based on a 52 snippet of a video) let alone 24 hours, that this was just a contrail from an airplane placed in an optical illusion angle.
Are our protectors that dumb-downed too?

On the flip side, I can't see how this was a missile (during rush hour) and not more people spotted it. Unless of course they did and this is just a common occurrence on that side of the country and no one is talking except our lil community here at ATS.

But I don't know enough about missiles/weapons to go down that avenue so I'll just revert back to my 50 years on this planet where, I've gotten fairly familiar with my skies and this is NOT something I've seen that often if....ever before (and neither are chemtrails but that's another topic)


So my consensus? It's a false flag event.
Keep up the good work OP

Originally posted by Xurxox
reply to post by pmbhuntress

 

Here are my suggestions to the collective of what you just posted

1) You can't hold a serious conversation
2) Your humor masks a more serious problem
3) Ignorance prevents you from contributing to the topic

If you're going to say something, make it remotely intelligent

Wow now that was ignorance at its best. (Figuring I was answering someone else's post. Just so that you know, my theories so far on this and in other forums, were that it most likely was a missile, and that within a few days afterward the government would say it was a con trail, WOW, I was psychic because that is exactly what they said it was. Same crap with the Norway spiral.

On top of everything else, I am finding it strange that no one here has even pointed out the fact that in the beginning of this whole mess, that the airports said there was no planes in the area. A con trail that came out of thin air???

Originally posted by backinblack
So, anyone still think it's UPS Flight 902 ????

lol, well I don't think it is 902
as my viewpoint is well known
by now
but good post
star 4 u

This was not a plane

There is a chance we all could be wrong

But I think this was some sort of Missile

Its not like the government will say ....China fired a missile 30 miles off the coast and none of the government saw them there lol

China may have some sort of bad ass new tech