It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ausar
i commend your use of hyperbole. its is as equal to the battle prowess and courage a woman signifies in the face of her own dissolution.
Originally posted by antar
Do you suppose that women in service to their countries are trained differently from men? What of the psychological training and preparation? Here's another video of the PLA womens army, they look pretty determined and if I may say so...mean as hell.
Originally posted by MonteroReal
Is not that women can't fight, they can, is proven, and they can be very good, but they should not fight.
There is a very old and historical reason to this, and is that when the SHTF and you have too many losses, well, men doesn't have babies, women do.
I'm not saying that women must be slaves who only breed, but the reason is good and is even more good when we are talking about societies with too much old people, too much men, or just too small population.
That's the reason why war is usually fought only by men and even when women go to war, is not to combat but in support roles.
Originally posted by antar
reply to post by TimBrummer
Wow thats impressive. I would like to know more, if ever you can link them here I would love to meet and talk with them...
Thanks!
Originally posted by dave_welch
The bad thing is, is that the select few who choose to use their gender as leverage overshadow the ones who do a stand up job.
That being said, please, no offense meant to the women here, I just feel the need to tell the truth and not sugar-coat things.
Originally posted by TheBirdisDone
OK logging in for the fray here:
I AM a US FEMALE VETERAN OF COMBAT!
Woo - hello didn't see that coming did ya?
I did 55 (male style if you want to know) pushups on one of my Navy PFTs, all the squids who finished their max stood around counting as I continued on till time was up. I am NOT butch, don't even begin to look the slightest bit butch although I did have a commander once tell me I had the biggest balls he had ever seen.
I am also gonna try and break it down lightly for you . . . YOU NEVER KNOW who is going to be OK in combat and gender doesn't have a rats a$$ to do with it. It really comes down to the individual, OK. Men will cry and wet their pants as easily as any of the "girls" in fact my scariest moments in war came after we went through some sh*t and I watched the reaction of some of the MEN around me when we got clear and I could let it register what I had just been through.
Let me tell you another thing my butt meant nothing to those guys when it came down to it - the classified materials in our possession meant a whole lot more, so none of the men were considering my delicate constitution, IT WAS ABOUT THE FRICKEN MISSION. Bah, some of these stero types are so outdated!!! My MOS back home had nothing to do with what capacity I actually worked in "over there" - Sorry can't tell you where I was or what I did - but women are in combat and there aint no turning back, you trust me.
Originally posted by SirKnightE
The picture at 41 seconds prooves why a woman should not be behind a weapon unless it is absolutly neccasry.
Sure a woman can join the military all she wants as long as its only combat support, not actual combat.