It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“I will take the liberty this time of dismissing as absolutely absurd this notion that somehow we were deploying 10 percent of the Navy — some 34 ships and an aircraft carrier — in support of the president’s trip to Asia,” said Morrell at today’s Pentagon briefing. “That’s just comical. Nothing close to that is being done.”…
The Indian media reports also say security for the Presidential trip will cost $200 million a day. Morrell “there’s been a lot of creative writing that’s been done on this trip over the last few days. I’ve seen other reports with some astronomical figures in terms of what it costs to take these trips. I don’t know the cost. We don’t speak to the cost.” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was blunt in his characterization of the cost reports, “this trip doesn’t cost $200 million a day.”
Originally posted by jrmcleod
Look either way i'm sure its costing a fortune whether or not we know what ther "real" figure is but i'm pretty sure its in the millions per day! (my opinion).
The point to my post was that instead of wasting this amount of money on 1 mans trip, why not share it around the US as it would be better spent. It doesnt really matter about the amount, its the principle behind it.
The fact is that no one has been told how much money its costing so the figure i quoted could very well be correct.
That is crazy logic. I wouldnt knw where to begin because as you put it, logistically it would be a nightmare but i'm quite sure its a rediculous sum whatever the figure!
Originally posted by Xerimethius
www.cnn.com.../video/bestoftv/2010/11/04/ac.o bamas.india.trip.cost2.mov.cnn
The above link makes it fairly clear that the $200 million dollar mark and the 34 ships are, at best, complete fabrications. Keep in mind that the $200 million dollar remark came from Michelle Bachman, who apparently places her complete trust in a newspaper that sources an anonymous source that doesn't cite his intelligence whatsoever. But of course, don't trust what you're reading. Vet the information for yourselves.
Brace yourself for preposterous disinformation from a certain political party, ladies and gents. It's only going to get worse.edit on 5-11-2010 by Xerimethius because: (no reason given)edit on 5-11-2010 by Xerimethius because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Esger
From This post
2 DAYS AGO
"The United States has deployed its fourth submarine in the Persian Gulf region following the deployment of three others near the Bahrain Port.
This comes as the USS Abraham Lincoln and French Charles de Gaulle aircraft carriers are heading toward the region.
The United States maintains twenty combat vessels, namely the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier, as well as fifty-three logistical vessels, in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman.
A total of thirty combat vessels are currently deployed in the region, including those belonging to Britain and France.
The USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier with 5,000 crew members, including sailors and pilots, has entered the territory of the US Fifth Fleet.
Abraham Lincoln is accompanied by USS Cape St. George and battlecruisers as well as four destroyers.
Linkedit on 5-11-2010 by Esger because: (no reason given)
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was blunt in his characterization of the cost reports, “this trip doesn’t cost $200 million a day.”
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by ofhumandescent
I am going to assume that you read a few pages then posted. Another poster, posted a link to a Navy site that shows ship movement.
here are the facts.. read them.. They have been vetted. Why do people not investigate? I am guilty also.. I believed the figures right off the bat.
“I will take the liberty this time of dismissing as absolutely absurd this notion that somehow we were deploying 10 percent of the Navy — some 34 ships and an aircraft carrier — in support of the president’s trip to Asia,” said Morrell at today’s Pentagon briefing. “That’s just comical. Nothing close to that is being done.”…
The Indian media reports also say security for the Presidential trip will cost $200 million a day. Morrell “there’s been a lot of creative writing that’s been done on this trip over the last few days. I’ve seen other reports with some astronomical figures in terms of what it costs to take these trips. I don’t know the cost. We don’t speak to the cost.” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was blunt in his characterization of the cost reports, “this trip doesn’t cost $200 million a day.”
Originally posted by mblahnikluver
Nice so Obama has turned into Jay-Z, Lil Wayne and Kayne West with an entourage of thousands and insane money wasted?
Is this on top of the 200million a day? What is this costing?
Does he really need to go there? This whole trip is ridiculously expensive, do we even have money for this?!