White House Insider: Pelosi Willing to Help Take Obama Down

reply to post by Mak Manto


no, this means his administration is falling apart and the insider's information about a huge scandal may soon come to light.

the chickens are coming home to roost

Ah where would the news be without rumors? Until there are some actual facts to back this up then it's about as believable as fox news. It wouldn't surprise me if the sheepole didn't vote the right back after all they do have a job to do. They need to finish the job of robbing us of our freedoms, wrecking the economy, and still millions more to put out of work. But that's ok the trickle down from the tax breaks we give elite will help everyone. Just look at how great it's been working so far!

reply to post by buster2010


there are facts, the insider has made numerous past predictions that all came true. i have no reason to believe this one wont come true until it doesnt.

we will see, and believe me it will be quite a site!!!

Just a quick note. You better download the Insider stuff before it disappears. Part 2 is now unavailable. I managed to get all the rest. It's a real mess and will take ages to clean up (ads, formatting problems, etc.)

Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's all rumors--until the rumors come true, then they aren't rumors any more, are they? Remember the John Edwards fiasco? Oh, those dastardly people are spreading rumors about that clean cut John Edwards. None of it is true! These people should be hung! Who believes the trashy National Enquirer? They are trash! It's all bunk! It's ludicrous. You guys are all nuts!

Or not.

If the Insider is wrong, let's jump on him! I'll join the fray!

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by sp00n1

 

man i wish this was true i'd love to see them all go.

the thought of pelosi and obama fighting makes me exstatic

even if pelosi does take down obama as the speculation goes

i'd rather push her off the bridge right along with the rest of the left

i want them all taken down!

i hope this is true there isn't anything like a liberal catfight

edit on 1-11-2010 by neo96 because: (no reason given)

I wonder if this means we'll get to see what in is in Obama's records??

Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by schuyler

 

What, prey tell, is a "reputable news organization" in your eyes? The New York Times? CNN? MSNBC?

There is no such thing as a reputable news organization. WSJ and NYT both have had major recent scandals about plagiarism and pure fiction. We currently have the Alaskan News controversy where they were conspiring to make a story out of nothing in order to damage a candidate. The talking heads on the magic box are admittedly just performers and not real "journalists." The embedded journalists overseas have a white-washed view and limited access to give the impression of transparency. The news from foreign outlets can take a small rowdy bunch of 10 or 15 people and make it look like the entire country is rioting.

You cannot believe your eyes and ears these days. Follow your conscience.

I agree how many times have we seen articles on the internet and a few days later show up on the msm?I think they just scan the popular blogs for their news stories.

"The insider's" responses are a little too well-written(well-worded maybe?) and a bit too heavy on the shadowy insider language that can be found in any political-intrigue film, that's what pops out for me right now. feels like a script. Obviously don't know for sure. I tell ya what: tomorrow is zero hour. we'll start getting returns in about 27 hours from now. wed morning we'll know the score, and the week that follows will tell the story, because, if they got the goods on Obama, the music starts way before the musicians are actually seated. so, wait and see.

I'm not knocking the poster but how are we flagging this post as the articles are coming from Newsflavor.com
How reputable can this place be it's only been around for 2008 and it's location is in Arizona...wondering if we can find out how this website leans? Again I'm not knocking the poster but I think this is a target audience and either side can get things going so the readers glomb on..

I think this is all bullshnazzle.

The fact of the matter is that we will all just have to wait a couple of weeks to see how things pan out and if we can shake some more things out of the trees.

I am thoroughly convinced that mr obama's skeletons are going to be 'coming out of the closet'

It's really too bad the attacks against this information are so lame. I really wish someone with some actual smarts would address the issue with some intelligence and acumen instead of just call names and pretend to be superior. These guys are doing more harm to their own reputations than anything else. I've just copied all the Insider articles over, except for the second missing file, and I also began reading some of the comments. (Hey, spoon, you're Jack Hammer over there, right?) A couple of things strike me as important.

1. The Insider is not exactly a "good guy.' He's being as manipulative as anyone. I'm assuming Ulsterman hasn't made this stuff up because, as I said way earlier, I just don't see any way he's positioned to know and I don't think he's capable of making it up. But the Insider himself is clearly instigating this whole issue for his own benefit. He's not being altrusitic and he's not someone I would trust very far. I'm not saying what he is saying is wrong; I don't think it is, but if there's a nuance to be made in his favor, he'll do it. Whether he is doing it on behalf of "his" candidate or not I can't tell. I also don't think he is morally in a very strong position. He's one of the guys who got us Obama in the first place.

2. There is some sense that the Insider is Emanuel himself. The evidence seems to be his speaking style (frequent obscenities), his closeness to the 'insiders,' his clear antipathy towards Michelle, and his departure. I don't know if this quite fits, but that's the meme out there right now. Some people seem quite certain of it.

3. I suspect Ulsterman himself is seeing this as a road to boosting his own brand. The Insider doesn't seem to respect Ulsterman very much and laughs derisively when Ulsterman mentions his "readers." That kind of begs the question of why the Insider would choose Ulsterman to spill these beans. It's as if he did not want it surfaced by someone more highly placed. I wonder how many other people the Insider has on the line here and how he is manipulating these leaks to his own purposes? Ulsterman seems a little too eager and the Insider is playing him like a fiddle. He wouldn't be able to do that to someone like George Will, for example.

reply to post by schuyler


i agree, nothing altruistic about it. the guy seems to be furthering his own devices.


Which page can't you view? have you tried to pull it up on archive.org?

Originally posted by sp00n1
reply to post by schuyler

 

Which page can't you view? have you tried to pull it up on archive.org?

Thanks for the tip. I just tried it and it did not work. The missing article is the second in the series, published September 15th. Url is: socyberty.com...

reply to post by schuyler


it looks like he reposted it on 10/25. no idea why, unless its updated?

newsflavor.com...

Every page of this thread has at least one post claiming this news source has been making all kinds of accurate predictions. Is there any way we can get a list of all predictions and which ones came true, which did not? Just curious.

reply to post by Curiousisall


If you go through the 'white house insider' series, the articles contain a lot of information passed on from this source.

the predictions included knowledge of which administration members and high ranking officials were going to be leaving, in some cases weeks before the public announcement was made.

So far, none of his predictions have not come true. I guess you will just have to read through the series, look at the dates they were posted, and decide for yourself.

reply to post by sp00n1


Like I said, on every page of this thread is at least one post containing the claim that this source has made all kinds of accurate predictions. Is there anyway you can back up that claim with a list of those predictions, or even a link to those predictions. Simply telling me to go look at the source and go fishing through it myself does not really back up your claim. I play this game with people making claims about prisonplanet enough. I assume if you can make a claim over and over and over and over again, it should be fairly easy to just back up.

reply to post by Zanti Misfit


No, not at all. The people at the top, those really in charge will never change. I don't understand people who rant about one party or the other; they are exactly the same. The Republicans will win this election, but will anything change? I can guarantee the answer is no.

Originally posted by Curiousisall
reply to post by sp00n1

 

Like I said, on every page of this thread is at least one post containing the claim that this source has made all kinds of accurate predictions. Is there anyway you can back up that claim with a list of those predictions, or even a link to those predictions. Simply telling me to go look at the source and go fishing through it myself does not really back up your claim. I play this game with people making claims about prisonplanet enough. I assume if you can make a claim over and over and over and over again, it should be fairly easy to just back up.

If the OP had not posted the sources originally, I would agree with you. But they are right there in the first post for you. Sometimes when you want to go after this stuff, you have to exert a little effort. Click on the links, follow them, and read them. What's so hard about that? THE SOURCES ARE PROVIDED. That's called "documenting your claims." You want things in a nice, neat package all laid out for you when it's already been done. Going to the source and reading it for yourself DOES backup these claims. Like you said, it should be fairly easy to just go back up, so just go do it rather than ask someone else to do more work on your behalf.

I might actually do it if I have the time in the next couple of days.

reply to post by Curiousisall


This is what he predicted, before it happened. If you look back through the links you will see he had all of the information in these articles before it became public. He mentioned specific names and the general timeline for when they would announce their departure.

Under normal circumstances a President's team of White House advisers, particularly those of the inner circle who were with him from the beginning, stay in office at least untl the end of the first term. In Obama's case that would be 2012. Yet for the past 2 months the country has witnessed a most unusual number of departures among the closest advisers in Obama's inner circle...a mere 18 months into his Presidency. This unprecedented exodus is creating serious questions among poltical observers concerning the possible unraveling of the Obama Presidency.

SOURCE

and...

More senior White House staff are to leave in the next few months, adding to the high exit rate from President Barack Obama's administration. Political analysts attribute the attrition rate to exhaustion, but Republican opponents blame disarray inside the White House, with an insular team responsible for too many policy failures.

SOURCE