Does anyone else find it strange that all of the Jewish Prophecies of the arrival of the messiah, and all of the Christian Prophecies of the return of
Jesus ‘on a white horse out of the sky’, are Prophecies of a messiah who is, for all practical purposes, absolutely
silent; a
messiah who, for all practical purposes, has
never had an original idea in his entire
life?
Maybe I am missing something here. But, after looking at this situation for more than 35 years, and after having read many of the things that this
messiah is supposed to
do, I have
yet to read anything in particular that this messiah is supposed to
say—other than, perhaps,
what has
already been specifically
written for him to say. In other words, it seems quite obvious to me that this messiah has already
had his script written
for him by either the Jewish or the Christian theologians; and that any messiah who goes ‘off script’ is, of course,
not any messiah in the first place.
Now, the reason for this should be obvious:
That is the job of the Jewish and Christian theologians in the first place: knowing what the
messiah will say when he arrives or returns. That, after all, is why they have been paid so many trillions of dollars over the past 2500 years or so:
because what they are claiming is a Knowledge of Truth fully
equivalent to the Knowledge of the messiah. So, in reality, this messiah can never
say anything
other than what has already been said by either the Jewish or the Christian theologians…
Which, of course, means that there is no real
need for the messiah to arrive or return in the first place; since, allegedly, the Jewish and
Christian theologians already
know what he is going to say; which is why there are no Prophecies of the messiah saying anything different than
what these religious ‘authorities’ are saying in the first place.
And this prompts me to make the following suggestion:
If the Jewish messiah were to arrive tomorrow—or, even if Jesus were to return, literally, on a white horse out of the sky tomorrow—it would
make absolutely NO difference whatsoever to this civilization.
Why not?
Because, eventually, after getting off his white horse or whatever, he would actually have to
SAY something.
And, at that point, the fox would be amongst the chickens.
What if this messiah were to contradict even
one of the fundamental doctrines of either Judaism or Christianity—or even one of the
fundamental beliefs of the Jews or the Christians?
What if he were to say that he had been here before--more than once?
What if he were to affirm that Mohammed was a prophet, for example?
What if he were to contradict even
one of the ‘universally-recognized-as-the-Absolute-and-undeniable-Truth’ interpretations of the
Revelation of John vomited out by tens of thousands of televangelists, Ph.D. theologians, or ‘do-it-yourself’ theologians?
What if he were to say something that was, in the
least degree, ‘off script’ about either the Dead Sea Scrolls, the
Gospel of
Thomas, the
Treatise On Resurrection, the Holocaust, the scientific method, the Eastern religions, Greek mythology, or the whole subject of
consciousness (for example, the findings of the Jungian analysts); things which the Jewish or Christian theologians do not understand because they are
completely unacquainted with that language?
The conclusion would be both obvious and necessary:
Even riding a white horse out of the sky is not sufficient proof that one is the messiah.
In fact, any messiah who contradicts even so much as
one of either the fundamental doctrines or beliefs of the Jews or the Christians—
even
a messiah who arrives on a white horse out of the sky—is, in fact, nothing but a false messiah; riding a white horse out of the sky being merely
another “
lying wonder” to convince “even the elect”.
In other words, even if the messiah were to return on a white horse out of the sky—but then deny or contradict
anything said by either the
Jewish or the Christian theologians—those religious ‘authorities’ would
COLLECTIVELY decide to wait for the
NEXT messiah
arriving ‘on a white horse out of the sky’ who did
NOT contradict anything said by either the Jewish or the Christian theologians.
Michael
edit on 26-10-2010 by Michael Cecil because: (no reason given)