What could this Be?? 911 - Second Strike Footage... Wing Disapears

Just for the record, I really do not have any theory, opinion, or position on the video nor the entire event that day. My post simply contained a video for Korg to view, and others to possibly discuss if they wish. Again, I have no desire to play detective on anything to do with the matter. My curiosity simply got the best of me and lead me to that video which I posted to perhaps shed light on the odd occurrence.

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by etcorngods

 

ARE YOU BLIND!!!!

Watch link here same plane different angle!!!!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

It shows a prolem with the other video!

Or could it be the other way round? Maybe the fact that there are so many anomlies it should make people examine the videos they thought were of reality.

Can you not see that side of the coin?

Korg.

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by etcorngods

 

ARE YOU BLIND!!!!

Watch link here same plane different angle!!!!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

It shows a prolem with the other video!

I can't tell which one is the "correct" one can you? Any one can see that the wing is gone on some of the pics -- not on others. You're mother wouldnt want you to use language like: "Are you blind?"

She'd probably send you to your room without dinner.

Originally posted by etcorngods
I can't tell which one is the "correct" one can you? Any one can see that the wing is gone on some of the pics -- not on others. [snip]

Exactly my point.

As there are also many many many other anomalies surrounding 911, that makes the OS obviously incorrect, I would defiantly side with evidence of video manipulation as opposed to the preposterous idea that multiple cameras could suffer the same glitch at the same time...

Korg.

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

Hi

Watch this

www.youtube.com...


Wing still there.... next! theory

edit on 26-10-2010 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)

You believe it because you saw it and ask why? Just as I did the footage of the wing disappearing made me think of reasons why.

Why not take this example...



Do you see it? is it real?

Korg.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


Quite lame, that video.

Do you see it? is it real?

And, a terrible example to use, in your "argument". Sorry, it's two

Reason that is so horridly amateurish, is the scale!! Hint: Research the actual size of an F-18, and compared to the size of the "building".

Really, what a joke!!!

(OH....and WHY is the fact that thousands of people witnessed the United 175 being ignored??? Not only the citizens in the surrounding area, laypersons....but also including trained professionals working for ATC, in the control towers at Newark and La Guardia).

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

Quite lame, that video.

Do you see it? is it real?

And, a terrible example to use, in your "argument". Sorry, it's two

Reason that is so horridly amateurish, is the scale!! Hint: Research the actual size of an F-18, and compared to the size of the "building".

Really, what a joke!!!

So you are saying that it doesn't look real? If that was aired on your news channel you would go of that's just a joke??

And you are now saying the reason is the scale?? can you prove that beyond a shadow of doubt????

And is it such a stretch to say that on 911 that they did the same thing and that the anomalies we are seeing are like your scale issue with the video above.

I know the video is not a real event... But if the scale was correct would you have a hard time believing otherwise??? Or does something tell you something is not right about it??

This is how we truthers as you call us feel and think when we see the footage of 911.

and as for the thousands of people you claim.... Where is their testimony?? Why is youtube filled with accounts of people that say they saw a Small plane or a missile?? Where are all the people saying they defiantly saw a commercial passenger jet??

Korg.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


Made a view frame shots from that youtube vid.
Definately dissapearing very weird,
nice catch!.good eyes my friend
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/564b734d2fc1.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by Korg Trinity

So you are saying that it doesn't look real?

Yes. That idiotic CGI video looks fake as a Master's Thesis paper written by Sarah Palin.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


WTF, the wing dissapears and then the whole plane dissapears just before it hits the building, I put it in slow motion. why was this clip eddited like this? I wonder who did this and why? ALSO, why is the plane a SHADOW. Someone definately messed with this video. In slow motion you can see this all clearly. A shadow, someone made the plane a shadow insted of a real plane.

reply to post by Korg Trinity

Exactly my point.

As there are also many many many other anomalies surrounding 911, that makes the OS obviously incorrect, I would defiantly side with evidence of video manipulation as opposed to the preposterous idea that multiple cameras could suffer the same glitch at the same time...

Korg

Since the other anomalies are much more "impossible". Although they happened. The only answer is that the 911 events were the result of an "Act of God".

reply to post by weedwhacker

We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology - Carl Sagan

Advice you may want to take into consideration. Do you think that it was possible to fake such an event on 9/11 using technology? Before you answer read your signature again and again.

Originally posted by etcorngods
reply to post by MiMobs

 

Yes, I am saying: "... all 911 skeptics look like a bunch of kids with over active imaginations."

There is ironclad evidence that things happened -- big things -- which couldn't have happened, yet they did happen. Such things, like these without wing planes, will perhaps continue to turn up. Look, I've been working on this "Acts of God" stuff for 25 years -- pretty much all day, every day.

25 years ago, I was told that there was a hidden language in the English language -- that couldn't be true -- I found the hidden language -- millions of hidden messages -- like the day of “911 2001 AD” converts to the word "Religion".

All, right, I'll follow you down this rat hole...by what iron clad methodology does, "911 2001 AD" convert to the word, "Religion"?

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

So you are saying that it doesn't look real?

Yes. That idiotic CGI video looks fake as a Master's Thesis paper written by Sarah Palin

If something doesn't look real, but it happened -- it is an "Act of God".

Originally posted by TheLieWeLive
reply to post by weedwhacker

 

We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology - Carl Sagan

Advice you may want to take into consideration. Do you think that it was possible to fake such an event on 9/11 using technology? Before you answer read your signature again and again.

edit on 26-10-2010 by TheLieWeLive because: (no reason given)

Carl Sagan wasn't a man of science, he was a religious leader. All his baloney could not be proven. He tried to get into the National Science Foundation. They turned him down. The said he was not a scientist.

You may want to take this into consideration.

reply to post by TheLieWeLive

Do you think that it was possible to fake such an event on 9/11 using technology?

Nope.

That sort of technology does not yet exist (if it is even ever possible TO exist).

Before you answer read your signature again and again

I don'thave to. But, perhaps you should. Because, it appears you have misconstrued its intent.

reply to post by GoodOlDave


By the ET Corn Gods language rules -- see: www.etcorngods.com -- a language, hidden in the English language. Iron clad it is not. Amazing it is.

911 2001 AD.
911+66+66 ... = 185, "Re".
2001 = 21, L+I = "Li". (drop 00)
AD is the letter N, "7 ion".
Therefore;
911 2001 AD = "Religion".

There you go, if is wacko -- just like the impossible events of 911.

But killing thousands of people as a warning about religion is no laughing matter.

And the FACT that 911 was an Act of God, not the OS, not the Truther's stoory, should shock the world thousands of times more than the original event.

Originally posted by weedwhacker
Nope.

That sort of technology does not yet exist (if it is even ever possible TO exist).

Or to be more precise, the technology doesn't exist yet to fake the 9/11 attack in the way the 9/11 truthers claim it was faked, with super thermite, hologram planes, lasers from outer space, counterfeit voices calling out from the planes, and the like.

reply to post by etcorngods


Off-topic rants and erroneous claims (lacking, as they are, any citations to back them) have become a sort of pestilence, in this thread.

FYI....Carl Sagan and his VAST number of accomplishments and respect and degrees in matters of science....Mr. Sagan is NOT the topic here. However, the attempted trashing of the man is noted (puzzling, but noted) and not to belabor this, and continue to stray....anyone who wishes may easily fact-check his credentials, online.

Now, either contribute some, any rational content, just once, or else run along, hmmmm?

Here is a clip, but a close up of the same building. This time the plane is NO SHADOW, like on the clip that was shown here where the wing disappeared then the plane dissapeared just before impact. obviously, someone messed with this video, the question is WHY AND THE REASON BEHIND IT ALL. Here is the up close video, put in slow mo and see that it is no shadow this time. youtube.com...
HEY, what happened here, wheres the vid?