It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What could this Be?? 911 - Second Strike Footage... Wing Disapears

page: 11
59
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 08:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Not the same thing at all... take a pencil and look at the top down.... can you see the shaft???


I disagree. I expected that though.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 08:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 





because if you look at the stabilizer/tail, that too looks like it's upside down.


That's the first thing that I saw~! Something just doesn't look right to me about the stabilizer and think about it, if the plane is tilted, it's like the tail never switches positions .. ?



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 08:53 AM
link   
Well, to simulate the exact circumstances is almost impossible. I just think in 2001 we did not have the best resolution in digital cameras at the time. I've had a digital camera since about 2000 and have taken footage of planes where they seem to blend into the background. Although not just one wing, sometimes it's both wings, sometimes it's the whole plane with only the contrails showing.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 08:54 AM
link   
reply to post by cluckerspud
 


So because you think this is not the raw footage and its been compressed that there are pixel issues the split second before it hits the trade centre...yes???

I see where you are coming from, however, if this is the case can you please point out any other instances in the video that have pixel issues as a result of compression?

Can you also prove to me that this is not the raw footage.

If you can do these two things i will not post anything more on this thread.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 09:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5544378a7935.jpg[/atsimg]

a sreenshot from Loose Change shows the impact
from 4 different angles and the plane has both wings
in all 4 shots. It is either a flaw in that posted
video or either it was manipulated to look that way.


I know someone else brought this up, but you can see the brightness of the right wing is more prominent on all shots. Considering the distance of the shot and the available resolutions at the time (2001)...it's more likely than anything else to be digital interference, and thus an optical illusion of the source itself.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 09:26 AM
link   
Personally I think it was the UFO they recovered at Roswell. It was piloted by Elvis Presley to get rid of a man in the twin towers that knew the true identity of who shot Kennedy.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 09:32 AM
link   
reply to post by laiguana
 


You and the others seem to forget that the 911 event(s) are full of inconsistencies, and impossible things -- things that couldn't have happened, yet they did. Like three perfect implosions, molten metal, missing parts of planes, the buildings were turned to dust -- where did the energy come from to do that?.

The pictures with the right wing intact are no more the "truth" than the two where the right wing is only a stub. That is the nature of Acts of God, inconsistencies, miracles.

God is saying:

"Look you pin heads, certainly it doesn't make sense -- doesn’t have to,, I'm God" .
edit on 26-10-2010 by etcorngods because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 09:50 AM
link   
reply to post by etcorngods
 


It is a fact that there are inconsistancies in the 911 story... But to take each and every little item and turn it into a conspiracy is absolutely dilusional.

That thought process makes all 911 sceptics look like a bunch of kids with over active imaginations.

So, what you are saying is... the 4 pictures are not accurate... but this one, where YOU say the wing disappears is, in fact accurate.. THIS MUST BE THE SMOKING GUN!!!!! OMG !!!! I like totally didn't see the logic until right here, right now.

So what are you implying exactly? Is this CGI? or is this just a Hologram? Or is this an inter dimensional plane that only requires one wing to impact buildings??? Did it shed its other wing into its host dimension right before impact?

OR OMG>>>>>> TRANSFORMERS ARE REAL!!! This is a transformer and we just caught it on video!!!!

A transformer would explain the buildings collapse and maybe just maybe.... This transformer fired an inaccurate shot and hit building 7... That would explain building 7 collapse..

I can not believe that I did not think of this before.. transformers obviously can use holograms.. There were no planes...
transformers have the necessary weapon systems to melt the steel.

Maybe... just maybe, the people jumping from the building werent "jumping" Maybe a great big transformer was flicking them out of the windows like buggers...

I am going to go over all of the 911 video to see if I can find more evidence of this.. I really really think we are on to something here.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 09:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Korg Trinity
 


Hi

Watch this

www.youtube.com...


Wing still there.... next! theory

edit on 26-10-2010 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 09:51 AM
link   
reply to post by etcorngods
 


Uh...yeah, there are inconsistencies in the 9/11 commission report (which I've read) - although it took me several weeks to do so. I certainly don't believe the official story and have reason to believe that certain sectors within our government were involved in the execution of the 9/11 event (which I believe to be a false flag operation).......but this 'no planes' idea is a distraction from the facts and a hindrance to the truth movement. Just because one footage is displaying digital interference and is being taken way out of proportion does not mean there were no planes that day.

This shouldn't even be an issue...but if this is where you want to focus all your attention to, be my guest.
edit on 26-10-2010 by laiguana because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:06 AM
link   
reply to post by MiMobs
 


Yes, I am saying: "... all 911 skeptics look like a bunch of kids with over active imaginations."

There is ironclad evidence that things happened -- big things -- which couldn't have happened, yet they did happen. Such things, like these without wing planes, will perhaps continue to turn up. Look, I've been working on this "Acts of God" stuff for 25 years -- pretty much all day, every day.

25 years ago, I was told that there was a hidden language in the English language -- that couldn't be true -- I found the hidden language -- millions of hidden messages -- like the day of “911 2001 AD” converts to the word "Religion".

The 911 events are loaded with things that could not have happened, yet they did. Miracles, "Acts of God".

Early on in my 25 yr journey, I found out that I could heal people of terminal diseases -- impossible, yet I've done it 22 times.

Got any friends/relatives with the problem, email me.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:08 AM
link   
reply to post by laiguana
 


Read my post -- I'm not saying what you say I am saying.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:22 AM
link   
Zorg, another video for you below. May possibly help to strengthen your position of this occurrence.

This is quite an interesting thread. This "wing disappearing" phenomena is only something that I discovered this morning by reading this thread. My curiousity prevailed and lead me to the following video to which was apparently zoomed in at 600%. It appears very odd to me at best. Not sure at all what it means, or what it is, nor do I care to play detective, but nonetheless, this is strange indeed.

Around the 30 second mark the odd occurrence develops.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by pplrnuts
Zorg, another video for you below. May possibly help to strengthen your position of this occurrence.

This is quite an interesting thread. This "wing disappearing" phenomena is only something that I discovered this morning by reading this thread. My curiousity prevailed and lead me to the following video to which was apparently zoomed in at 600%. It appears very odd to me at best. Not sure at all what it means, or what it is, nor do I care to play detective, but nonetheless, this is strange indeed.

Around the 30 second mark the odd occurrence develops.

www.youtube.com...



Very interesting -- looks like the end of the wing just came off right before the impact. That is further confirmation that this event is an Act of God. Wings don't just fall off. And they don't just fall off in half the videos and not fall off in other videos -- except with Acts of God.

God likes to play "Can you top this" -- certainly the 911 event was a "Can you top this" event of one "it couldn't have happened but it did" event after another.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:33 AM
link   
reply to post by etcorngods
 


This post explains it all... You go ahead and have a great day. I didnt realize that you were "special"


I wouldn't run around telling people things like that. Your eventually going to run accross someone who gives 2 flips about you, and are going to have you evaluated by a "professional".



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by MiMobs
reply to post by etcorngods
 


This post explains it all... You go ahead and have a great day. I didnt realize that you were "special"


I wouldn't run around telling people things like that. Your eventually going to run accross someone who gives 2 flips about you, and are going to have you evaluated by a "professional".


Very childish tactic. "If you can't dispute what he says, just insult the hell out of him".



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:37 AM
link   
Honestly, all the videos posted with the wing "disappearing" have the plane silhouetted against the sky. None of the videos are in excellent condition, and they even look like they had some kind of filter to improve the image quality by blurring it slightly and reduce speckling.

It has been shown and re-shown that the plane tilts and lights up EXACTLY where the wing "disappears" in the silhouetted videos. The fact that anyone is willing to ignore that shows just how... smart some people at ATS really are. Either that or some people just don't want to let go of an idea once they've sunk their psychological anchor into it.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:41 AM
link   
reply to post by etcorngods
 


I really did not mean that as an insult. I know it came out that way .... But you and I are part of 2 totally seperate realities.
Have a good day.



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Varemia
Honestly, all the videos posted with the wing "disappearing" have the plane silhouetted against the sky. None of the videos are in excellent condition, and they even look like they had some kind of filter to improve the image quality by blurring it slightly and reduce speckling.

It has been shown and re-shown that the plane tilts and lights up EXACTLY where the wing "disappears" in the silhouetted videos. The fact that anyone is willing to ignore that shows just how... smart some people at ATS really are. Either that or some people just don't want to let go of an idea once they've sunk their psychological anchor into it.


Your statement shows how arrogant some at ATS can be. You ignore many things. Like the shadow of the broken off wing does not feather out like you would expect if it were a shadow, it is a right angle "cut".

Time may tell who's smart, and who's not.

edit on 26-10-2010 by etcorngods because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 10:50 AM
link   
reply to post by etcorngods
 


ARE YOU BLIND!!!!

Watch link here same plane different angle!!!!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

It shows a problem with the other video!
edit on 26-10-2010 by wmd_2008 because: spelling




top topics



 
59
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join