It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

David Wilcock blog on Disclosure 10/23/10

page: 3
13
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 01:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by DrumsRfun
He was saying it on coast to coast radio as well...that wasn't Bill Ryan talking for him,those were his own words.


When the date was first released it was Bill Ryan on stage that said it. Wilcock, on C2C, mentioned it AFTER Bill Ryan


Spiro



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 01:56 PM
link   
reply to post by cdesignmaster
 





Ok, he doesn't know what he is talking about or is just copying and pasteing. I'll buy that just as soon as you give in detail how an automobile engine will work 10, 20 or 50 years in the future, thus, proving he is wrong.


O.K. first of all I'm not David Wilcock I don't know when discloser is going to happen any more that you can tell me what the car engine might look like 50 years from now, so if you what to know that you should ask him.

What I can tell you is that the car engine is a heat pump look it up if you want, a 100 year old heat pump.

So no matter what you run through it Gas, Brown Gas, Diesel, cooking oil, butter, water, or anything else you might think of is old tech. It's the most inefficient system we use today. Just think if the internet was not the way it is now, we would be doing this by mail, if you new what the future would bring the internet, then your name would be David Wilcock.

So the gas engine will change just like the mail, into the internet, now what shape or form that new power system will take you should ask the Oil company's they probably know better that you and me.

The heat pump is what is keeping them in the money, you and I feed them all the time.

Is there something new coming down the line I'm 100% sure of it, will it use OIL probably not, may be to lube it but not run it. It would be better than anything David can think of or predict or cut and past you can bet on it.

And now I predict that discloser will happen on October 10 2011, O.K. David prove me wrong.




posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 02:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Rahjian
 


I've always felt, if someone has something so incredibly pivotal to say to mankind, they wouldn't do so via book sales and lectures.
I think David is a very good speaker, very articulate, pretty informative and has the ability and skills to bring everything together in a very cohesive manner however, like I said, why make money doing something so spiritually important? If anything, people like Wilcock agree; money, power, greed, control etc are the dark forces ruining and running this planet.

At least Edgar Cayce (ya know, the person Wilcock is incarnated from) did his humane gestures for free.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rahjian
Yeah It's not even worth arguing back and forth Rex, go back to your troll cave. This is the Alien/UFO forum no? Let me talk about what I want. Freedom of speech buddy. Anyway, who is going to watch The Event tonight? (this isn't off topic, Wilcock talks about The Event and Ancient Aliens TV series as possible subtle disclosure)


Rahjian.....


This is the Alien/UFO forum no?


"This is the Alien/UFO forum" yes, which is why this Wilcock BS should be in the Predictions & Prophecies Forum.

Regarding Wilcocks's material.....

It's mind-numbing.....just mind numbing..... :shk:

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



edit on 25-10-2010 by Maybe...maybe not because: Clarification



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 02:16 PM
link   
My friend, ive been wondering when are paths would cross [again?] You remind me very much of a Human Alien on another forum I frequent



Originally posted by Human_Alien
I think David is a very good speaker, very articulate, pretty informative and has the ability and skills to bring everything together in a very cohesive manner however, like I said, why make money doing something so spiritually important? If anything, people like Wilcock agree; money, power, greed, control etc are the dark forces ruining and running this planet.


Doing this full time, how else would he survive without making a few quid?


At least Edgar Cayce (ya know, the person Wilcock is incarnated from) did his humane gestures for free.


Mr Cayce charged, in most cases


Be safe be well

Spiro



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 02:24 PM
link   
TBH, why does everyone out there in the ufo community have to come off as some New Ager batty pseudo-scientist?


I mean really, just wtf?



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 02:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by Rahjian
 


I've always felt, if someone has something so incredibly pivotal to say to mankind, they wouldn't do so via book sales and lectures.
I think David is a very good speaker, very articulate, pretty informative and has the ability and skills to bring everything together in a very cohesive manner however, like I said, why make money doing something so spiritually important? If anything, people like Wilcock agree; money, power, greed, control etc are the dark forces ruining and running this planet.

At least Edgar Cayce (ya know, the person Wilcock is incarnated from) did his humane gestures for free.


That is his job man. That is how he makes a living, he focuses all his time on this topic and has a strong passion for it. No different from a historian or journalist.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rahjian

Originally posted by DoomsdayRex

Originally posted by OldDragger
Any of you believers ever get tired of chasing your own tail?


Of course, I suspect there are people on these forums tied to the hucksters, purposefully and willingly spreading these lies on their behalf.


And I suspect there are people on these forums tied to the illuminati, purposefully and willingly spreading lies about people like Wilcock and Greer to discredit their true findings.

See how easy it is to play devil's advocate?


Wicock,is doing nothing more than repackaging a 100 year old philosophy into terms even ignorant people can be shyster-ed into.

It is called Theosophy.

Look it up and read it.

All this New Age psycho-babble is just socialism poppy cock.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 03:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Oneolddude

Originally posted by Rahjian

Originally posted by DoomsdayRex

Originally posted by OldDragger
Any of you believers ever get tired of chasing your own tail?


Of course, I suspect there are people on these forums tied to the hucksters, purposefully and willingly spreading these lies on their behalf.


And I suspect there are people on these forums tied to the illuminati, purposefully and willingly spreading lies about people like Wilcock and Greer to discredit their true findings.

See how easy it is to play devil's advocate?


Wicock,is doing nothing more than repackaging a 100 year old philosophy into terms even ignorant people can be shyster-ed into.

It is called Theosophy.

Look it up and read it.

All this New Age psycho-babble is just socialism poppy cock.



And the Old Age religion-babble is just imperialistic poppy cock.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Spiro
 


Pleasure to be here. No hard feelings.
Leaving ATS would be the hardest thing to outside of getting over my fear of the dentist and spiders.




posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 06:04 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 06:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by cdesignmaster
What part of "If I was in charge of ATS, all Disclosure material from Wilcock, Greer and company would be immediately moved to the hoax section and those who post them slapped with the warning" is NOT an ATTEMPT TO SILENCE those that disagree with you.


Because no where did I say it was about disagreement. I said, very specifically which you purposefully ignored it was about liars. Wilcock and company, every one of the Disclosurist high priests, have been wrong time and again. Every other hoax is moved to the appropriate forum and those


Originally posted by cdesignmaster
Once again, I will repeat, that it is your OPINION that they are liars and hucksters.


It is not my opinion, it is fact. FACT: They are consistently wrong. FACT: They perpetuate hoaxes (Greer's moth-as-alien photo, anyone?).

Point to ONE time they have ever been right in their predictions. Point to ONE verifiable fact they have ever uttered to support their claims. You can't.


Originally posted by cdesignmaster
You don't want to read anything that Wilcox or Greer says, so you want them and their followers silenced (moved to the hoax section) and slapped with a warning.


I read everything they have to say. That is how I know they are consistently wrong. That is how I know they are liars.


Originally posted by cdesignmaster
So, what you're really saying is that only the topics and opinions that you believe in should be allowed to be posted, all others be damned.


No where did I say that. But that is typical of Disclosurists such as yourself; you have an allergy to the truth, instead engaging in twisting of facts, misrepresentation. You are every bit a liar and huckster as Greer, Wilcock and company.


Originally posted by cdesignmaster
What I suggested was simply that you ignore those posts and allow for the free expression for all.


Point to a single place I have said opinions other than my own should be silenced. A direct quote, not something you have to "interpret".

But congratulations, you did exactly what you set out to achieve. Instead of discussing Wilcock and his problems with the truth, you changed the subject to the personality of his critics.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rahjian
And even if David Wilcock is wrong, his theories are very interesting


Wilcock has no theories, at least none of his own. He is regurgitating old theories, not even putting a new shine on them. He has nothing original to offer.


Originally posted by Rahjian
especially the 2012 Enigma


There is no "2012 enigma". It's just white people misappropriating and misinterpreting Native beliefs and traditions, in a racist attempt to make themselves seem spiritual and deep.

The entire ancient astronaut beliefs are founded on an intense racism, that being dark-skinned peoples could not achieve what they did without intervention of higher powers.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 06:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rahjian
And the Old Age religion-babble is just imperialistic poppy cock.


So what?

That doesn't make the New Age babble any more (or less) valid.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 07:26 PM
link   
Stars and Flags.

I was just browsing Wilcock's site late this morning, and I always come away feeling that something about him is just "not right." I want to like him. I want to find something interesting in his stack of thought, but nothing he's ever done or said has really gelled with me and I'm not entirely sure why. Here are a few observations about Wilcock:

1) I'm really tired of him complaining about how sick/depressed/down/ and under the weather he always is. I mean, people get sick from time to time. Buck up! But the guy whines about it all the time. I remember one of his posts where he went on and on about being sick and by the end, I'm thinking that" this guy has some issues!?" In his most recent post, he admits he's been down in the dumps lately..and again, I think he can be somwhat depressing at times. He seems to always be getting over some illness, or recovering, or in the midst of, or worried about getting sick....etc.etc.etc.etc.

2) Like his friends over at Project Camelot, he seems to believe everything he hears verbatim. We all have to use some discretion when judging the people, places and things in our lives, but Wilcock seems unable to do this.

3) I have challenged some of his assertations on his website, and they were promptly removed. How are we supposed to come to any conclusions without enlightened discussions and other viewpoints coming to the fore? Why is he afraid of being intellectually challenged? I get the feeling Wilcock just wants devoted followers and isn't interested in debating anyone or giving a moment's time to someone who might not agree with him. We all know how important it is to welcome other points of view into any discussion---that's how we acheive balance. But Wilcock isn't interested in balance. He's interested in having the pulpit.

Unlike other people who seem to have a unique grasp on various mystical/new age/conspiracy topics, I can't say I've learned anything from Wilcock that I've taken away and have integrated into my life. There isn't anything he's written that has become a valuable part of my life......

Anyone else agree with these opinions?
'



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 07:35 PM
link   
Where to start with David Wilcock!!!

I think the reply by one of his moderators in the following quote, sum up Mr Wilcock quite nicely.




Pamela October 24, 2010 ... Great blog that I have been anxiously awaiting! I have a question for David though. You had said that at the end of October, you would be all over the television. Is this still on? Has the time line changed? Thanks so much for all you do, David smilies/smiley.gif [Moderator: These things do not happen all at once, and David cannot say what it is or whether he will be in it until after it airs.]


So he acknowledges nothing until after it happens.......the guy is a joke



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 07:40 PM
link   
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
 


Typically the skeptics are ignorent as usual. Clinging to the disclosure fallacy as the rest of his work must make them feel uneasy or something.

Wilcock never predicted disclosure in '09. Your thinking of Pete peterson, whose message was passed on by Wilcock.


Then you have decided to shoot the messenger.



Disclamer: In no way whatsoever am I saying I agree with Wilcock or that anybody should listen to him. In fact I dont like him one bit, but still 'deny ignorence'.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   
I really despise cracks like this who ruin the entire idea of taking UFO/extraterrestrial beings as serious matter, stuff he has written is a joke.

No one with a brain is going to believe that alien invasion movies = forthcoming disclosure. And outside of the fringe (us) who are pressuring the government for disclosure, what incentive do they have to let the cat out of the bag? Let's be honest here---the government is already dealing with enough problems, especially Obama. The economy, middle-east, unrest on the home front...why come out with some random presser and say that aliens are here?

It just doesn't click with me--I truly believe the only way we will get a full disclosure is when either the aliens show up over major cities Independence Day style (but why would they have any incentive to do so), or some type of miraculous video evidence comes through. I think that's a stronger possibility, but the professional debunkers will never accept any type of evidence minus an extraterrestrial walking up to them and striking up a conversation, and then they'll just bleat about it being a "false flag".



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 08:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Rahjian
 


I enjoy reading what Wilcock has to say and I read it with a grain of salt and stay positive about the outlook of things.

It's easy to get bogged down with negative thoughts/feelings and the bigger picture is like a puzzle. Each piece is useful.



posted on Oct, 25 2010 @ 09:08 PM
link   
In regards to WilCock, hes one sketchy mutha that appears to want nothing more than to profit off of his version of spirituality and aliens.

Now in regards to China. I think he made a good point in his post (which most of you probably didn't read), about how China will be the ones to initiate disclosure. Now do I think China is going to disclose to the world that a bunch of love bearing human aliens want to liberate their people and the people around the world? #$*@ no. But I do believe that they may have some hand in releasing information about the reality of UFO's, just to throw off the Eastern European families that have been pulling the strings around here. WilCock was painting the picture in his post of a Noble China that wants to shower the world in light and save the day with disclosure. But I mean get real, they have so many firewalls on their internets bros can't even play world of war craft over there anymore.

So I agree that China will most likely be the first ones to make a move in regards to UFO's, but it will still be in their interests, and not the interests of humanity.
edit on 25-10-2010 by seanizle because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join