It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
There is a difference between demons and evil corporeal beings.
The 'Collins Elite' group makes it sound like these are the demons (spirit) type of evil.
I fully agree that aliens are nasty buggers who don't have out best interests at heart.
But they are solid creatures whereas demons are spirit.
*snip*
Originally posted by thegoodearth
reply to post by FlyersFan
Not going to really comment on the religious nature here,
however, the evil intent they insist is behind the "alien" encounters
would be in line with what Dr. Stephen Hawking states would be
any kind of contact alien life made with us.
He asserts it would not be "friendly".
I agree with the "not friendly".
I cannot imagine why people seem to think
that alien life would want to be our "friends"
and helpers.
I doubt they would view us as a Twelve Step program
that they need to "correct".
This all stems from new agers and charlatans like Stephen Greer to former Government intel like Bob Dean and Clifford Stone "whom i like and hope are telling the truth" at the same time why should we trust them? Perhaps they are cover up operatives ?
Originally posted by Luminakisharblaze
Please stop viewing us as evil. Your kind is not evolved enough yet at the genetic level for the technology you are looking for. It is not far off that you will reach this level.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by Unknown Soldier
Hiya Soldier. I enjoyed your post, but I can't pass by without making a point about Bob Dean.
This all stems from new agers and charlatans like Stephen Greer to former Government intel like Bob Dean and Clifford Stone "whom i like and hope are telling the truth" at the same time why should we trust them? Perhaps they are cover up operatives ?
He's a flat out contemptible liar.
If you have 10 minutes to spare, load up his Project Camelot interview on google video and skip through it. Wherever you stop, he's in the middle of telling a whopper and shedding crocodile tears. Both him and Cliff cry in the same places of their narratives. In the PC interviews, Dean makes such 'bold' claims as having met annunaki, travelled on alien spacecraft, time-travelled, seen Nibiru,,,'Oh it's a wonderful, beautiful place....sniff...sob.'
For a man with such experience, why is he now haunting the conference circuit (crying again!) with old NASA images that he claims shows alien bases on Mars and spaceships following the Apollo missions? Not just that, but his images have been identified for years! Why doesn't he tell his audience the same BS he told Project Camelot?
In the gallery of bad human beings that litter ufology, this guy is one of the worst in my opinion. Sure, he's not caused as much damage as Greer, but he's equally manipulative and deceitful.
As for Cliff Stone. He comes across as a nice guy who's stories got away from him. My favourite is his account of an alien mass-abduction of a whole Cambodian/Vietnamese village. It was prevented by a GI with a bible in his pocket. LMAO!!
Originally posted by Luminakisharblaze
And I am not sure what you would consider coming out of the galactic closet.
Originally posted by harryhaller
The standard ET theories don't hold any water, 90 billion miles to talk to a redneck? But the overall result is clear, fear, pain, humiliation, confusion, and so on. There is also a lot that suggests they are telepathic, and can create scenarios based on your thoughts. Possibly technological, but also possibly telepathic, something distinctly non-tech.
Also, 99.9% percent of ufo encounters are purely visual. It's easier to create the appearance of a "space ship" than to create a real one, they are all mirages.
In fact we are constantly creating 'psychic' connections with entities. An avid UFO hunter often creates the condition for manifestation of an alien craft (which can be photographed) by the very passion he has. This is the reason why we should not look up to Mr Alien. Things are not what they seem.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by crowdedskies
In fact we are constantly creating 'psychic' connections with entities. An avid UFO hunter often creates the condition for manifestation of an alien craft (which can be photographed) by the very passion he has. This is the reason why we should not look up to Mr Alien. Things are not what they seem.
Perhaps? How does this explain the great many sightings by people with no interest in UFOs? On two separate occasions (with witnesses), I've seen true UFOs and on neither occasion were any of us thinking about UFOs, aliens or anything similar.
Likewise, how does it explain the singular lack of success amongst UFO researchers? They spend their lives thinking about UFOs and never see one.
Originally posted by harryhaller
This is a most curious thread
There has been as much evidence for "demons" as for "aliens" over time. They are the same of course. A group of entities interacting with us since the dawn of time, who hold knowledge, and grant favours. They can perform seemingly impossible things, and assume a variety of guises.
We have historically the story of the watchers, the fallen who bred with humans. The flood seemed to stop them, as they would have gained a certain mortality in doing so. The brought many types of strange knowledge., including metallurgy, astronomy, etc.
In the intervening millenia, there has been a constant assortment of strange phenomena, partly physical, partly supernatural. While we could debate the validity oif any of these individually, there are too many to dismiss, entirely, something else is here with us.
The standard ET theories don't hold any water, 90 billion miles to talk to a redneck? But the overall result is clear, fear, pain, humiliation, confusion, and so on. There is also a lot that suggests they are telepathic, and can create scenarios based on your thoughts. Possibly technological, but also possibly telepathic, something distinctly non-tech.
Also, 99.9% percent of ufo encounters are purely visual. It's easier to create the appearance of a "space ship" than to create a real one, they are all mirages. (IMHO "bluebeam" is a project to create technologically what can be done ... "demonically").
It all runs around your beliefs of what you are. If you believe you are an organism, then aliens are the only possible solution to the evidence. If you believe your organic self is only half your human existance or potential, then there maybe is another set of realites, of which we are part, and of which we know nothing.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by crowdedskies
In fact we are constantly creating 'psychic' connections with entities. An avid UFO hunter often creates the condition for manifestation of an alien craft (which can be photographed) by the very passion he has. This is the reason why we should not look up to Mr Alien. Things are not what they seem.
Perhaps? How does this explain the great many sightings by people with no interest in UFOs? On two separate occasions (with witnesses), I've seen true UFOs and on neither occasion were any of us thinking about UFOs, aliens or anything similar.
Likewise, how does it explain the singular lack of success amongst UFO researchers? They spend their lives thinking about UFOs and never see one.