It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ceetee
reply to post by crowdedskies
The populous is hungry for information and with this level of interest from the public building, people might start to demand answers from the controlling governments now. Which can't be a bad thing?
Originally posted by ceetee
reply to post by crowdedskies
you could be right, but we know that governments have withheld information on UFOs as they've released the information years later under the freedom of information act. Then we have lots of ex-military/nasa/etc testifying under oath that what they say is true so it's not as wacky as fairies.....
Originally posted by ceetee
reply to post by crowdedskies
surely the fact that these are documented events that are archived away should add more weight than a civilian sighting?... some of these documented events involved multiple accounts from different people. The people (in some cases) then swear under oath that they are telling the truth. Their superiors didn't raise a concern that half of a base was taking the piss and wasting time when they should have been guarding secret nuclear warheads in rendlesham did they? I think we have to take the military revelations of late quite seriously, unless of course you want to drop the concept that what they do is properly controlled and monitored?
edit on 16-10-2010 by ceetee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by allourep
Haven't been able to read through all the comments, but has anyone got to the bottom of this? I just feel its not only impossible for a whole village to disappear over night, but also for it to happen without the whole world hearing about it somehow. Its just something you cant cover up. Especially when Yahoo has an article about it. Or I might just be confused about what's really going on with the article.