Same UFO Filmed, Same Day, Different Place - 10-10-10

reply to post by JJBB22


I re-worded your questions so they were not as suggestive. And I omitted the last one.

Q: Did you notice anything unusual the next day, or today?
A:
*If Yes*
Q: Could you please go into detail
A: (I will obviously ask impromptu questions during this.)

Q: How has construction work been in the area?
A:

Q: After the object left, did the skies remain empty?
A:

(I don't want to "lead" them to the answers.)

EDIT--
If this is "bad" just say so I can put them right back the way you had them.

(IMO this is better for getting truth though...)

Thanks for everyones response, opinions, and thoughts on this.

I haven't had the opportunity to read through everyone's post, so forgive me if you asked me a question and I have not replied. Tonight when I go through the thread, if there are any questions, I will answer them asap.

-Thanks

reply to post by Oozii


You will be upset Oozi, they have crammed another thread into yours. An unrelated thread.

I am trying my best to keep both topics, but it gets so hard sometimes

reply to post by adigregorio


Woah, bizarre!

It's not a celestial body! how strange that two people on ATS a huge site would be living in the same street and witnessed the same UFO incident! that almost never happens!

I had not seen those vids on GLP! they heard helicopters and saw them too, which tells me (and this is speculation) that those choppers were chasing or trying to get a good look at whatever was in the sky. Helicopters will not follow an RC toy. For one it's too big! (the ufo) to be a toy especially at the distance and in relation to the background objects.

This is either a coincidence (which I don't believe in - things happen for a reason) or a hoax a major hoax and I cannot see it being either.

reply to post by adigregorio


lol thanks, I was thinking 5 mins ago, we have to think of questions that are not suggestive, and that don't plant ideas , >< I failed but it's good you caught that!

The questions look a lot better now you have edited them we don't want any false or misleading information to come back from witnesses!

reply to post by adigregorio


Ah, don't worry it happens

Thank you though

Originally posted by lee anoma

What have "Counts" got to do with releasing another video?

Guess we'll never know since the dude was just banned.

Is that a record? Two posts within 3 minutes and banned?


reply to post by Ahmose

Well....actually an RC plane can sit in one place. I didn't think so until last night when someone posted a video contrary to my beliefs. This isn't the same video but still portrays what I believe was called "helicoptering" among the RC crowd. Watch around 1:20.
Video

Originally posted by miniatus
WTF?
An RC plane?

That sits in one place?

I don't think so.

If you geeks believe that,
Ive got a galaxy to sell you,
nice & cheap.

Remove your heads and stop believing everything the media tells you.
jesus christ.

Originally posted by Ahmose
yeah seriously.
goddamn people are stupid sometimes.
common sense= all but common.
durpdurp

Back at you, "durpdurp ". I guess ignorance really IS bliss.

reply to post by adigregorio


sent u2u

Q: Are lights used in the sky by more-'earthly' flying vehicles?

Q: Do you think that you may been mistaken and it wasn't a craft from
another dimension or galaxy, but possibly a craft from this planet?

Q: Would you think the above question is reasonable or should we just
agree that it was a flying craft from another galaxy and move onto
discussing which planet?

Q: Don't you think there is a more reasonable chance this is a light in the
sky that you WANT to be a vehicle from 'out there'?

Q: Do you consider yourself someone who is a major player in all of this
and will get the girl and save the day?

Q: When you see something that you don't understand, do you immediately
think that a mundane answer would be out of the question and reach for
paranormal or 'outside-mainstream-media' possiblities?

Q: Would you consider that flying a craft in another planet's airspace with
outside lighting blazing is a poor idea considering your lack of concern in
contacting the residents of said planet?

... and finally,
Q: Do you watch or read a lot of science fiction, where the hero or heroine
of the story overcomes the opposition? Does this type of storyline make
you feel happy and hopeful?

Please fill out the questionaire and let Polly do the printing.

Q:

Originally posted by thormg1976
reply to post by miniatus

 

I understand exactly what you are saying with that. I gave that a good amount of thought as well. But in the past the legit UFO sightings have been shown on radar and not just with visual sightings. But the Air Force and Navy no matter what should have scrambled at least a fighter plane to assess the situation.

What is there to assess and why bother to scramble any planes? At best they will get some bleeps on the radar IF the ufo is uncloaked, while if its cloaked they will get nothing. If they try to shoot it down chances are the ufo will abduct the fighter before the pilot gets a chance to lock-on and even if they shot a ufo down it will likely cause mass hysteria.

Its a lose-lose situation and thats assuming the government isn't in total cahoots with the aliens which I am relatively sure they are. Ex-service personal have already testified in this regard and you can find the testimonies at the disclosure project.

reply to post by JJBB22


copters, i dont think either would be used to chase a toy, when u can use a flash light on the ground to spot that.
they would use copters for aireal persuit for a large object what looked pretty high and use them for something worth tax-payers dollars...yeah, like a toy ?!?

Originally posted by Three_moons
Well....actually an RC plane can sit in one place. I didn't think so until last night when someone posted a video contrary to my beliefs. This isn't the same video but still portrays what I believe was called "helicoptering" among the RC crowd. Watch around 1:20.

I saw that the RC planes can indeed hover. However, considering as objectively I can the possibility of those lights being RC planes, I must say that if they were RC planes, the pilots were very, very skilled. Even close to the ground, a hovering RC plane still moves around a bit, sways in the wind. These lights didn't seem to be moving at all until they were really moving. Gotta be an RC copter, if its an RC anything. Also, just to say it again since we're on a different page (>.

reply to post by EarthCitizen07


The military stance is not to engage the craft but only to attempt to make contact with the craft. the only way they would fire on the craft was if it were to attack a ground target or the aircraft. They would follow the same rule of engagement whether it were from earth or not.

reply to post by VenomVile.6


Exactly! sorry I must have phrased something wrong in my post above, corrected it now to read "The ufo is too big not the toy" >

reply to post by JJBB22


Me too !!! i was agreeing wit cha, but in my words

reply to post by JJBB22


Ok. So I started excited, got an explanation that seems reasonable. I'm leaning towards hoax. Whatcha thinking: hoax? Yes or no?

10-10-10 Compilation

reply to post by adigregorio
I think your most recent post was still a bit leading and suggestive. Play dumb and oblivious to the, any and all situations. Be creative and make small talk to get people to speak their mind about the night in question. There may be no construction work in the immediate as the escort may have just been passing through and miles away and unknown to them. Unusual to them may not be police cars and lights driving down the road. Asking about the object is suggestive. I don't have any great questions right now but I don't think these are the best ones. I'm not beating you down and appreciate you offering to go out and do this but I don't think these are the best questions. I'll post back if I have anything to actually offer. Thanks in advance.


reply to post by tetsuo
I agree that "helicoptering" probably wasn't what was seen here but I was getting nit-picky about it not being possible. The appearance of them not moving at all can also be them moving directly towards or away from the viewer. I'm not making any confirmations of anything but rather just trying to be reasonable about possibilities. I do not know what actually happened by any means. In case I've gotten confused among all these videos, wasn't the cops/arrested/controller video related to the video that showed two blue objects? If so, the controller only accounts for one of them, correct?

Originally posted by thormg1976
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

The military stance is not to engage the craft but only to attempt to make contact with the craft. the only way they would fire on the craft was if it were to attack a ground target or the aircraft. They would follow the same rule of engagement whether it were from earth or not.

I guess anything is possible. I was just "speculating" based on years of research.......

reply to post by Human_Alien


movement patterns seem like rc + looks to close to the ground