Chaos Will Rain on America from now Through 2012 (Prophecy) Dangerous Times!!

reply to post by Setoman


I'm stubborn and I don't want to believe you on that part. I'll keep my mind open for now. I know Revelations concerns the entire world but I thought maybe we were getting a glimpse, a tiny speck, the american speck of the bigger picture.

I wonder if the US were to move its capital, what would be their reason to do so. I hope it's not because of a similar 9/11 event if you know what I mean.

Concerning the new currency, it sounds as if he is alluding to the chip or at least the end of paper and coin money and sole reliance on debit/credit cards.

*scratches head*

Does ATS know this guy ran off with all the conspiracy theories?

Will this guy honestly claim these are his?

Are people really buying this poppycock?

Should I have eaten that extra calzone?

I wonder if I will lose sleep over all this.

reply to post by Dasher


OP, please pass this on to your friend.
Thanks.

Okay I can honestly say this is the first time in over a year I feel like I'm in the short bus in the car pool lane heading to tard town, I'll have better information from a 1969 magic 8 ball.
I'm out.

reply to post by HappilyEverAfter


You're fooled into thinking that you're free yet your rationale is powerless to determine your own basic path entirely (and not just by simply physical limitations, but by imposed limitations!), but only when worried/stressed sheep turn to historical (and no longer in context) cycles for comfort regarding false and true shepherds are you vocally active? Don't you realize that most humans have been on "the short bus" the whole time? If you are so removed from such issues, why are you not offering compassion and direction to the weak? Please, do so.

reply to post by Setoman

He also said and I quote: "I did not create the craziness. I did not start the fire. I attempted to intervene but men did not listen to me says the Holy one. They avoided my counsel; they avoided my word."

My question would be, is God the plagiarizer or is Billy Joel? Things must be getting bad if God has to steal lines from Billy. I think God might be better off plagiarizing some real writer, maybe Bob Dylan. Now there's a real person worth plagiarizing. In fact I choose Dylan to be my prophet/God. As Bob say's "Gotta Serve Somebody." In fact some of his writings could be some kind of prophecy. Plus I know Bob is real because he shows himself and even records his writings. Where if God is real , he should get down here and help out because the world sure could use some help. I also don't think God would give prophecies about the U.S. moving capitols or changing currency. I mean really now, c'mon!

Wait a second , I could be wrong. It seems, according to this thread, www.abovetopsecret.com... the op might have his first prediction right. Attempted assassination, by the book or by a book. Now if Obama can't go on I'm going to be a believer, or not.

Originally posted by pigwithoutawig
Wait a second , I could be wrong. It seems, according to this thread, www.abovetopsecret.com... the op might have his first prediction right. Attempted assassination, by the book or by a book. Now if Obama can't go on I'm going to be a believer, or not.

I'm serious, this will be a serious attempt.
We could possibly see the Life snuffed out of the first black president!!!

reply to post by Setoman


Did your friend write down this prophecy as the Lord was giving it to him?

I would like to read the original, unedited version.... exactly as the Lord gave it.

Thanks!

Originally posted by sodakota
reply to post by Setoman

 

Did your friend write down this prophecy as the Lord was giving it to him?

I would like to read the original, unedited version.... exactly as the Lord gave it.

Thanks!

I have some of the quotes not all of them. Give me a minute.

reply to post by Setoman


Look,
You are the one that started this thread.

Your OP had many things in it you cannot prove.

You are saying you believe your "friend" is a prophet.
===============================================

That guy you seem most upset by

-- that You called retarded 4 or more times, that YOU called a load of crap --

gave his reasons point by point to show why your "friends" "prophesy" could be interpreted to mean many things. Ambiguities pointed out.

He spoke reasonably and civilly.

You in turn called him a load of crap and a retard.

Then later, in another post in reply to ME on this subject, you say that's what Jesus would have done.



And still you call the other guy unreasonable.

Does that answer your question to me plainly enough on why I said what I did?

reply to post by Setoman

I'm serious, this will be a serious attempt. We could possibly see the Life snuffed out of the first black president!!!

You seem to be hoping for this one a little to hard, if you ask me.

Originally posted by MMPI2
I'm telling you, the people who are yelling the loudest and cursing the most at the guy are the people who are the most disturbed by the prospect of what he/she says.
Note that the whiners are either antichristian, agnostic, athiests or general malcontents that don't derive peace from any other area in their lives. THEY ARE SCARED AT EVEN THE PROSPECT OF BEING JUDGED.
Even though I understand that their manifest hatred of the poster and his message is based in their own terror, I don't understand why these people simply do not click on threads with titles reflecting prophetic messages. Why even come to a site like ATS? Is their mortal terror so deep that they seek out a reason to rage against any sort of prophesy? Or is it that they are so spiritually bankrupt that they have to take pitiful stabs at anyone who brings a religious message?
I look forward to hearing your thoughts

My thoughts? I will keep it brief. Prophets come to ATS all the time looking for some sort of audience and/or following. If they are met with questions, most turn from "godly" to downright rude and hateful.

The OP also did that and it sadly didn't surprise me at all. That is the biggest "terror".

Originally posted by Setoman
First of all like I said, This is not the end-time, this is not the Judgment of God, this is not the end of the world, this is not the events of revelation, this is not the wrath of God.

Second of all, you are wrong about the NT prophets. Prophet Agabus clearly prophesied about a great famine that was coming to roman. So take that to the bank! I'm not saying NT Prophets don't edify, that is their main reason. To perfect the body of christ and to help with the work of the ministry. But God also reveals to them things where are to come and they tell the church to prepare them, just like Agabus.

edit on 12-10-2010 by Setoman because: (no reason given)

Problem is Agabus was an example of predictive prophesy to protect the Church and congregation, as he spoke the prophecy at 'church' - a congregational prophet - which falls directly in line to edify and protect the church. It bears no resemblance whatsoever to the Old Testament Hebrew prophets who were national figures warning of national calamities that would occur to Israel and the tribe for not repenting of their wickedness.

The predictions that you set forth do not fall under the prophecies a congregational prophet would supply.

Hebrews 1:1-2 clearly tells us that there will be no more prophets in the vain of Old Testament prophets, which really still aren't even the prophecies you've given - your prophecies are more like fortune cookies, they don't fall scripturally under any manner of prophecy because they do not rebuke sin and they do not edify, they simply foretell future events of political, emotional, and economic significance; none of which fall under biblical prophecy.

God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by Setoman

 

Look,
You are the one that started this thread.

Your OP had many things in it you cannot prove.

You are saying you believe your "friend" is a prophet.
===============================================

That guy you seem most upset by

-- that You called retarded 4 or more times, that YOU called a load of crap --

gave his reasons point by point to show why your "friends" "prophesy" could be interpreted to mean many things. Ambiguities pointed out.

He spoke reasonably and civilly.

You in turn called him a load of crap and a retard.

Then later, in another post in reply to ME on this subject, you say that's what Jesus would have done.



And still you call the other guy unreasonable.

Does that answer your question to me plainly enough on why I said what I did?

edit on 10/12/2010 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

If you think what he said was reasonable, then I guess what applies to him applies to you.
I have nothing else to say to you!

Originally posted by againuntodust

Problem is Agabus was an example of predictive prophesy to protect the Church and congregation, as he spoke the prophecy at 'church' - a congregational prophet - which falls directly in line to edify and protect the church. It bears no resemblance whatsoever to the Old Testament Hebrew prophets who were national figures warning of national calamities that would occur to Israel and the tribe for not repenting of their wickedness.

The predictions that you set forth do not fall under the prophecies a congregational prophet would supply.

Hebrews 1:1-2 clearly tells us that there will be no more prophets in the vain of Old Testament prophets, which really still aren't even the prophecies you've given - your prophecies are more like fortune cookies, they don't fall scripturally under any manner of prophecy because they do not rebuke sin and they do not edify, they simply foretell future events of political, emotional, and economic significance; none of which fall under biblical prophecy.

God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

This is why you are mistaken, this was spoken in the context of a "church".
But never the less the church is not a building. YOU ARE THE CHURCH, YOU & ME!
We are the church, not a building. Anyways this same prophet went PERSONALLY to Paul and gave him a prophecy of what was going to happen to him in the future.

Secondly, You have no clue what biblical prophecy is.
I repeat it again so you can hear it. You have no clue what biblical prophecy is. NONE AT ALL!
I'm just telling you the Prophecy paraphrased, not even the message that comes with IT!

Again, you know not the scripture, Hebrews 11 has nothing to do with OT prophets being eliminated.
Your doctrine is not BIBLICAL whatsoever! You don't even know what edification is!

reply to post by Setoman

If you think what he said was reasonable, then I guess what applies to him applies to you. I have nothing else to say to you!

So without actually saying it and getting your post removed AGAIN, you called me a "retard" and a "load of crap".

LOL You notice I never said that I agreed with everything he said. I agreed with how he said it. And I disagreed with your rude responses and name calling.

I said it to you earlier, but I will say it again. Gee, god must be soooo proud of you being such a "fine" example.

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by Setoman

 

So without actually saying it and getting your post removed AGAIN, you called me a "retard" and a "load of crap".

LOL You notice I never said that I agreed with everything he said. I agreed with how he said it. And I disagreed with your rude responses.

I said it to you earlier, but I will say it again. Gee, god must be soooo proud of you being such a "fine" example.

edit on 10/12/2010 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

I was addressing what he said not how he said it. Then you should had stoped acting like you agreed with what he said!

reply to post by Setoman

I was addressing what he said not how he said it. Stop acting like you agreed with he said!

I just said I didn't agree with Everything he said. Actually I never said I did.He had a right to say it the civil way he did without being called rude things.
You just don't get it. You still don't see what my problem with your responses is...
You still seem to think it is ok to call people names and insult them. Ever heard of the Westboro Baptist Church?

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by Setoman

 

I was addressing what he said not how he said it. Stop acting like you agreed with he said!

I just said I didn't agree with Everything he said.

But you still seem to think it is ok to call people names and insult them. Ever heard of the Westboro Baptist Church?

I said he was acting dumb, and retarded. That was obviously a joke, I never said nor meant that he was dumb or retarded. Just like you acted like you agreed with 'everything' he said. Anyways, you picked it up and ran with it. I'm not the one turning it into a spectacle