UN to appoint Earth contact for aliens (Exaggeration)

Originally posted by Beyond Creation
The notion of appointing a spokesperson to greet E.T.s in ridiculous.

Do you think Columbus appointed himself or someone else to speak to the Indians of this country?

Why would it be different now?

So is it really ridiculous? I can tell you right now, no way would I appoint the resident brain on here to speak for all of humanity.

Put it like this, if microbes made first contact, you think some scientist from UCLA would be appointed to inspect them? Heck no! It would be some scientist they bought off. It's going to be someone they can control.

reply to post by mryanbrown


do you mean for the article ?


Finnish morning paper`

heres one from finland , its a regional paper from down south but i take it their word is as good as anyones

reply to post by witness63


With the Aussie news source as their source.

Originally posted by SaturnFX


This is the big issue with "believers"...and it puts them in the very same boat as the most rabid fundamentalist religious person...you demand that since something cannot be disproven, then it should be seen as true.

I've agreed with pretty much everything you've contributed to this thread thus far and have really enjoyed your points and arguments - but this comment I have to disagree with. You are generalising by lumping all "believers" into the same boat. Of course, you have a point, and many believers can become fervent and rabid in much the same vein as religious fundamentalists.

But for those of us who have experienced, real, profound, intense, beautiful encounters - who have our own personal proof without the need for anything else - to label us as such, indeed to tar us with the same brush and therefore discount our experiences, does us a big disservice.

History tells us alien contact with the assumed powers already happened in the early 1950's. They (Eisenhower and the CIA/MIC) screwed it up. Wrong species to deal with anyway,(Greys/ Verdants/ Tall Whites) and wrong outcome (secrecy and allowance for abduction) and wrong motivation, (power and weapons technology to wage control). The aforementioned species are here to cause us to blow the game so they can assume our systems resources. News is they are loosing a grip on us. They put people in positions of influence to drive us to wars and weaponization of space that will disqualify our classification as sentients worth inclusion into the massive community of intelligent species that fill each galaxy in our deep sky catalogs and more.

Our leaders and bureaucrats, including multi-national corporate powers cannot be trusted for anything but their own enrichment of power and control. Other more friendly species know this. Now it will be given to the people, not the power addicts.

When and if disclosure happens it will be a madhouse. People quiet until then will then acknowledge their own experiences publicly. There will be demands for protection, information and general fear and anxiety. No one will have the answers and fear will reign.

Release of information will come from everywhere, but few will really even come close to understanding the implications, let alone the new sciences and effects on our general awareness. The confusion on who to believe will not be easy to wade through. People will project their fears, their unreasonable hopes, their scant understandings into the information materials, confusing and complicating any authoritative source for information even more.

This UN appointee will not know anything but the bias and agenda of the science community. There are better people here on ATS to deal with this than her. And, yes, I believe the UN is a ruse anyway invented for control for a few.

So whatever happens have your bug-out bag ready. Stay cool. You can't dodge crap from a fan unless you stay low.

ZG

reply to post by smokingman2006


I find it extremely refreshing to witness such a thread garner more than 100 flags and 17+ pages in one day. It demonstrates a level of willingness on the part of the ATS community to collectively give a crap about something relatively important as far as current world events go.

Kudos for a successful thread topic smokingman2006, and also a personal round of applause to those members who found this topic interesting from whatever viewpoints or for whatever personal reasons.

People paying attention to decisions being made that may indeed have affects and effects on us all, and our planet, and our evolving place among the future of the stars

It doesn't matter if one is a believer, a skeptic, a debunker, or a knower, we can all recognize and acknowledge this international decision is a statement of some sort, on our behalfs, no less.

great thread,
ET

Originally posted by schuyler
The UN certainly has a high opinion of itself. Why would anyone pay attention to this good-for-nothing organization? The UN has no authority. I have a feeling if the aliens did land this woman would be standing alone on the White House lawn with her hand out while the aliens were landing in Wyoming. Remember the scene in Close Encounters. It was very brief, but when the ship had landed and the door started to open, several man in business suits were rushed out of the VIP room putting on their jackets to "greet" the aliens---who paid absolutely no attenion to them and welcomed Richard Dreyfuss aboard instead.

What I'd really want from the UN is a passport and visa to leave earth as soon as it was allowed--or whatever documents we're going to need.

I have a strong sense that our planet is the Bulgaria of this part of the galaxy--or maybe even the Afghanistan--and I definitely would like to see what else is out there.

Originally posted by spikey

Here's a quote from the story (by Heidi Blake) that i found a little curious..

“The continued search for extraterrestrial communication, by several entities, sustains the hope that some day human kind will received signals from extraterrestrials".

“When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject. The UN is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.”

Did anyone notice it?

When talking about receiving communications from ET's, she didn't say "IF we do.." she said "WHEN we do"

She seems pretty sure there IS going to be some kind of communication...

IF i read a newspaper with any regularity, it would be The Daily Telegraph.

It was ''by several entities' that pricked up my ears.......................

Originally posted by Human_Alien

They're a fact when they happen to you. You see, I don't need a committee to validate what I already know

And why do you know what you know? You and I may have read the same stuff, watched the same videos, etc...yet I do not understand why you jumped to a conclusion as to the absolute reality of the situation.

were you abducted? even if you were, that does not make it a worldwide fact unless you can produce enough solid evidence to prove you were...until then, you may have been abducted, or you may have thought you were abducted but in reality just got slipped drugs, or you were abducted by some nasty secret military organization with grey robots as greer suggests, or etc etc etc...so why should someone else believe what you say and completely rework their viewpoint on the universe based strictly on what you percieved to happen.

alot of people claim alot of wacky things...does that mean that because some may truely believe many wacky things are happening to them, that the world should accept that as proof enough?

face it, you just dont get what we are saying...you have turned the study of UFOs and Extraterrestrials into a pseudo religion and I am personally offended at that..your pretend fight for understanding is a clever way to make the rest of the people whom tend to believe seem wacky..you do nothing but harm in the field because of your exceptionally closed mind...get outta my sandbox!

It is true, according to The Independent newspaper.

It doesn't necessarily mean they are "expecting" although it hints towards some sort of expectation.

Originally posted by the.lights

Originally posted by spikey

Here's a quote from the story (by Heidi Blake) that i found a little curious..

“The continued search for extraterrestrial communication, by several entities, sustains the hope that some day human kind will received signals from extraterrestrials".

“When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject. The UN is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.”

Did anyone notice it?

When talking about receiving communications from ET's, she didn't say "IF we do.." she said "WHEN we do"

She seems pretty sure there IS going to be some kind of communication...

IF i read a newspaper with any regularity, it would be The Daily Telegraph.

It was ''by several entities' that pricked up my ears.......................

and the mentioned sensetives...clearly they are saying channelers are going to be there.


fun reading into things

Originally posted by the.lights

It was ''by several entities' that pricked up my ears.......................

I have a couple of guesses what those might be, and it's not the fumbling, bumbling SETI program, either--the one that supposedly hears dozens of signals that they always 'lose' for some reason.

I think that program is the equivalent of what Blue Book was to UFO investigations, only with more radios.

Originally posted by SaturnFX
There is only 1 person whom can possibly fit the job...

Will Smith.

Heck yes!

Will Smith for Ambassador!!

Originally posted by the.lights

Originally posted by SaturnFX


This is the big issue with "believers"...and it puts them in the very same boat as the most rabid fundamentalist religious person...you demand that since something cannot be disproven, then it should be seen as true.

I've agreed with pretty much everything you've contributed to this thread thus far and have really enjoyed your points and arguments - but this comment I have to disagree with. You are generalising by lumping all "believers" into the same boat. Of course, you have a point, and many believers can become fervent and rabid in much the same vein as religious fundamentalists.

Actually, I put the quotes around the believers to seperate them from the rest...I am a believer, but I am one to also demand evidence, proof, etc...and look favorably upon skeptics whom attempt to falsify any idiot that comes along with a crystal and a channeled message from Vrill..the people whom would like to kill the skeptics and put the channeler as the head of the movement are the "believers"...aka, morons

But for those of us who have experienced, real, profound, intense, beautiful encounters - who have our own personal proof without the need for anything else - to label us as such, indeed to tar us with the same brush and therefore discount our experiences, does us a big disservice.

Subjective truth is great...hell, I wish I had my subjective truth, then I wouldn't be so crazy in trying to find some actual proof in this area...then it would be a simple understanding and perhaps going to the next phase. I envy people whom may already have subjective truth.
but
even if I had subjective truth, I know that does not mean there is objective truth..I cannot prove anything, and I would then simply state that I believe in aliens, I believe they are here on earth, and my belief stems from my personal experiences...you can believe me or not, but everything I state about the subject comes from my belief based on experiences.

and I would still look favorably on skeptics trying to rid the world of liars and the insane.

The average person whom believes in the possibility I have no problem with...even when they draw personal conclusions...the only issue I have is when they look on the same thing I look on and then catagorically state things are one way or another based on little more than how they feel and then become angry when that gets challenged.

Don't know if anyone's noticed this coincidence yet....

Mazlan Othman= M.Othman

MOTHMAN....

So why do this now? They've had ample opportunity to do this for the past 50 or so years, seems they are softening the general public up for disclosure.

reply to post by witness63


Disclosure, for all intents and purposes, would be the equivalence of heaven. Of course, this does no good for the Lucifer group, so they have to try to stall it as much as they can.

However, how can the few of them expect to combat the millions, possibly billions of minds of the believers? If I were them, I'd choose to go back to the positive side. As Salusa used to say, every chance is given to the dark to go back towards the light, if they choose to.

As far as Phage, you haven't killed anybody, have ya? If not, then I believe you still have the chance to "turn back." Maybe you'll start at 0(or even 10% or 20%, because I don't think you've done anything truly evil yet), but at least it's a lot quicker to 51% positive than 90% negative. Otherwise, go bother another dimension or something.

disregard post. bb codes

reply to post by bestideayet


Hey Bestideayet that is cool thinking!! Way to go....I wonder if that is just a coincidence or not???

By the way, this was also covered on Fox News early this morning. When I went to their website, there was nothing on there about it but it was talked about this morning on TV. I'm guessing they reported on it and then someone came along and told them to shut up about it. That's why now it's mainly only covered in foreign papers.

reply to post by SaturnFX


Thanks for your reply - a lengthy, intelligent and thoughtful answer. I am in complete agreement with you.

On the subject of belief. I don't believe a book written thousands of years in the past for me to adopt it as my own belief system or to interpret my reality through. I don't believe what a politician may tell me as truth, since there are two sides to every argument - and facts, figures and statistics can be moulded or distorted to fit most arguments.

What I do believe is what I see with my own eyes, what I experience - real, irrefutable, verifiable, there. And when I discovered several others experienced what I witnessed too, then I also had validation. That's all I need. So for me, the whole argument, the issue, has been answered categorically yes. Regardless, I find it very interesting watching and reading all the discussion, argument, claim and counter claim here, especially with the insight and perspective I'm privileged and fortunate to have had.