VIDEO: Comments from Off Guard Commentators When FOX News Cuts Off President Of Iran for Talking Abo

reply to post by Xcathdra


so true.


i see it soooooooooooooo many time here.

snipits, snipitheads!

Fox commentator on ahmadinejad

'' He seems to make the argument that we went to war because we made a profit from selling arms to go to war.... obviously thats a problematic point of view ''





Ahh.... you couldnt get any more obvious if you tried.

reply to post by Agit8dChop


it is always big profit from war!


you know what the margin of profit is?

does anyone? does anyone know the shelf life of munitions? what it costs to make bombs? c-30's, patriot missiles,
black triangles?


i'm sure the insurance is insane! lol!

steady income but no where near the oil co's.

Why on earth would anyone trying to cover a conspiracy attempt to cover what this man is saying. Every time he says conspiracy, inside job, etc. he makes "truthers" look crazier in the eyes of the American public. He probably gets a crisp Benjamin Franklin every time he says Conspiracy or 9/11.

Food for thought kids.

reply to post by nesta

I have also read viewpoints on this site that look at the Iranian revolution as if it were a good thing, I don't get it. Please explain to me how Ayatollah, the fundamental extremest, is better than the Shah. I'm not saying the Shah didn't have his faults but if he wasn't overthrown Iran would be a much better place today and there's no way anybody can convince me otherwise. Sorry for going a bit off topic there.

The Iran Contra affair is perhaps what you are seeking.



Quote from the narrator:

And the committee issued a 700 page report of its findings[on the Iran Contra hearings]. But there are still many important questions that the select committee left unanswered, and unexplored. Often, the official explanation seemed inadequate... and contradictory.

reply to post by GogoVicMorrow


you think?

I dont think he makes any 'truthers' look crazy at all.

anyone who says to me

'' your a truther and your no better than ahmadinejad '' purely because we speak the truth, obviously isnt the sharpest tool in the shed.

Just because I dont agree with this mans policies, doesnt make what he says any less truthful.

Now, they cant shut him and up and refuse to televise EVERYTHING he says, that would be too obvious.

No, they wait until he says 911 / Zionist regime then they burst into their holy'than'thou speach

''' well this man is clearly mad, etc who would believe a nut job..... '' sort of come back.

the US media stinks soo bad, I can smell it here from down under.

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow

 

you think?

I dont think he makes any 'truthers' look crazy at all.

anyone who says to me

'' your a truther and your no better than ahmadinejad '' purely because we speak the truth, obviously isnt the sharpest tool in the shed.

Just because I dont agree with this mans policies, doesnt make what he says any less truthful.

Now, they cant shut him and up and refuse to televise EVERYTHING he says, that would be too obvious.

No, they wait until he says 911 / Zionist regime then they burst into their holy'than'thou speach

''' well this man is clearly mad, etc who would believe a nut job..... '' sort of come back.

the US media stinks soo bad, I can smell it here from down under.

That's what I'm saying though. I'm simply saying he's not the best spokesperson for the truth movement because the majority of.. well everyone dislike him for the policies of his that you yourself disagree with. I'm not saying he or anyone that wants truth is wrong. But I am saying that the government probably rejoices that from now on if they get truthers on the spot they can say so you agree with Ahmadenijad and have the viewers booing without that person getting a chance to defend themselves. You and I both know that's what Fox news loves to do. I saw them hound a woman for saying Hitler was brilliant. They tried to twist it to make her look like a fan when she was simply saying he was a brilliant man. So they could very well try to lump truthers into a category and label them as supporters of Mahmouds Ideology. Then from there who knows.. terrorists. Get what I'm saying? I bet they don't a bit that he's talking about this stuff.

It is absurdity to think the US went into Afghanistan and Iraq to make money off weapons sales since those wars amounted to great losses of money for the US, that is what Omeninjajab was insinuating with his speech? Absurd, I think Fox news did a great job by cutting that dumass off.

Originally posted by quantum_flux
It is absurdity to think the US went into Afghanistan and Iraq to make money off weapons sales since those wars amounted to great losses of money for the US, that is what Omeninjajab was insinuating with his speech? Absurd, I think Fox news did a great job by cutting that dumass off.

edit on 27-9-2010 by quantum_flux because: (no reason given)

Haha.. well WE lost money. The taxpayers. However the higher ups, people in the government like Cheney made a killing selling their weapons to tax payers for a war they/he started. So what he is saying is somewhat true.

reply to post by quantum_flux


yes, american lost money, but the corporations didnt.
sounds like the bankers doesnt it.
america lost money, but those bastards seem to rake in billions.

you think americans would have cottoned on by now.

reply to post by Agit8dChop


proof

or it didn't happen.

reply to post by fooks


you serious?

you need someone on an internet chat board to show you proof before you'll believe bankers and corporations effectivley robbed the american populace of their wealth?

reply to post by Agit8dChop


He's an American what do you expect? Show him proof and he'll switch from not believing to not caring. Were ranked 25th in education?! Well we need more special ed programs that teach stupids the abcs in 10th grade.

"good enough"

FoxNews was doing an analysis on the Speech, and did not censor anything. If you listen the edited clip at the end, they move on to a different topic to go over. The comments that Americans ignore the truth then move on to not caring is hypocritical at best. This thread has been biased as the OP did not present the clip in the context it was intended, insted portraying it as censorship.


UN Itinerary for Sept 24th
According to their Itinerary speakers had the floor from 8:30 am till around 12:30 pm.

BBC news covers the walkout 2 02:17pm EST
Obama leads new UN pressure on Sudan over votes

Ironic that people will continue the attack even when they are wrong or misled while at the same time complaining Americans ignore the facts.

You guys will come across a lot more credible if you would practive what you preach.

Originally posted by AndrewJay
reply to post by Agit8dChop

 

He's an American what do you expect? Show him proof and he'll switch from not believing to not caring. Were ranked 25th in education?! Well we need more special ed programs that teach stupids the abcs in 10th grade.

"good enough"

And you are? Funny enough that the "proof" in this thread is incorrectly portrayed in an attempt to make a point about censorship. Fox News didnt censor anything, as my post above shows. Americans ignore the facts, yet 3 times now the OP had his post debunked, yet people continue to run with the story because they hate Fox News, The American Government, or the UN Delegates for walking out.

Americans ignore the facts.... You are doing the exact same thing you accuse Americans of.

reply to post by beebs


I don't see how it invalidates my point. From what I've gathered, the arms sale happened after the revolution. Even if the CIA helped fund the revolution, an absurd suggestion because the Shah was already basically controlled by the United States, my point still stands. The Shah of Iran was a better leader for Iran than the Ayatollah. Thank you for the information, but I don't quite understand the argument you were trying to make. If it was a counter to my proposal that the Shah would have been a better leader for Iran, than I'm still not convinced.

It is because FOX news is owned by an Israelis company.Search up the name Rupert Murdoch and find him to be a jewish zionist.

Interesting and I didn't even know that till a few days ago. It just gets more interesting with the jewish connection by the day.

Originally posted by jonnyc55
Any person who isnt solid in the head could see that A's point was proven about the propaganda machine after his speech was cut off.

They don't always have to be a moron. They could just happen to work for those slime balls. You wonder why I laugh at the human race?

reply to post by Xcathdra


This stuff just came out recently how has this been debunked? You sheople cause so much pain and mischief in this country. You guys continue to vote these clowns in office without searching up their credentials. I so despise the human race and really we could of been more, but alas I see no hope any more.

reply to post by dragnet53


The Fox comment about censorship, which is the topic you are in, was misleading by the OP. Scroll up and read the several posts showing the video of Sheppard Smith was doing a post speech analysis and not commenting on it live. They did not censor anyone.

As far as the comment about who we elect, thats just funny. We didnt elect Sadaam, so I guess its ok he gased the kurds and killed millions of his own countrymen.

But hey, it sounds like you are a perfect example of Stockholm syndrome. You begin to identify with your captures,

Maybe if you guys took care of your own and voted in.... nevermind, you dont vote for your leaders, they fradulantly win the election. We have no diplomatic relations with your country aside form an intrest section in the Swiss embassy. How exactly do we make life misserable for you guys? By wanting your leaders to go on record saying they are not developing nuclear weapons, by wanting them to abide by treaty obligations they signed onto?