It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ALIEN? From my file another unseen Pic of Possible UFO with Alien or something!

page: 1
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 05:52 PM
link   
I posted a PIC yesterday and now Im posting This is NEVER before seen. I have had it for a few years now. I share with you something I have been looking at for a long time. Do you guys think this could be an Alien? I know it sounds far fetched but as far as pics go its all we have to go on.

All I can give is

Location: West Sussex, England UK Countryside.

Time: 12:08 am 18th Nov 2005

Weather: Clear and Dry.

Looked like a balloon or silver saucer or half moon type object not to high up in the sky. It "floated" with strange movement, up and down side to side but often at the same time (hard to explain).

It made zero sound and was 1.5 ft by 1.5ft or a touch bigger. Yeah on the small side.

Could jump from one place to another, not like a balloon at all. More like it could jump from spot 1 to spot 2 fifty feet away.

Thats all really. It was seen two nights in a row. Never reported to authorities as there was no reason to. Only when you blow the picture up do you notice a striking resemblance. I have obviously blown the PIC right up to see the "Alien".
























edit on 063030p://f06Friday by L1U2C3I4F5E6R because: Added original



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 05:56 PM
link   
Can you please post the original raw image. Straight from the camera. It is impossible to analysis a photo unless it's raw.

Thanks



With that said....I believe this is a clear case of Pareidolia.



edit on September 24th 2010 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 06:07 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


Leo, just added the original that I have on file. Sorry for forgetting that. I did load it to up just not posted it.

There it is.



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 06:49 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


Greeneyedleo.....

Perhaps this is a job for.....

The Penetrating Photographic Process!!

Cheers
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 06:50 PM
link   
None of the images posted look like they came straight from the memory (card) of the camera used to take the picture.

There is no EXIF data embedded in any of these images.



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 06:52 PM
link   
I think you might think about a new camera.
Perhaps one with a "focus" feature? Most newr models have that.
All I see is an out of focus blob!
Jeez



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 



This is magnified a lot. Put it this way. Its a photo thats been enlarged. It was sent to me in 2005 the day after it was taken. I blew it up.


This is one of the original photos to which you can see hardly anything.






edit on 063030p://f58Friday by L1U2C3I4F5E6R because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 07:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Whoa!
ain't science....AMAZING?
That PPP is......far out!
Look at all the crap it revealed! Whoa hey howdy!
Thanks for turning me on to PPP!



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
 


That still isn't the original/raw photo.

Raw means uncropped, unedited and uploaded straight from your camera.



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 07:09 PM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 


I believe there is a $10,000 reward for someone to debunk the method too.

For some reason I get the feeling the offer of the reward isn't quite genuine.

Not sure why?




posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 07:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


I can't imagine.
But, I have contacted them to have my own photos PPP'd!
I'm looking forward to their estimate of how much PPP costs!
I'll pay anything.
yeah....PPP



edit on 24-9-2010 by OldDragger because: (no reason given)




edit on 24-9-2010 by OldDragger because: I've been at work for 10 hours! Imagine how rummy I'll be by 10 or so!



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 07:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
 


That still isn't the original/raw photo.

Raw means uncropped, unedited and uploaded straight from your camera.





what do you mean please?

The photo i just posted was straight from the persons Digital camera camera and straight to me via email. I just shrunk it to fit in the other post. Here is the one I got but its huge. What else should I have. I do not have much else. Sorry












edit on 093030p://f23Friday by L1U2C3I4F5E6R because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
 


L1U2C3I4F5E6R…..

As per my extensive post to you in your other thread, we’re after the EXIF data table……it can tell us a lot about what has transpired as the photo was taken.

The EXIF data does not seem to be available from your photos as posted.

Here’s an example of an EXIF data table:



Kind regards
Maybe…maybe not



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 07:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


OK how do I get that please. I will get it for you if you tell me how.

thanks. I understand you are only trying to help, and I like to learn.



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 07:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 

OK how do I get that please. I will get it for you if you tell me how. thanks. I understand you are only trying to help, and I like to learn.


L1U2C3I4F5E6R.....

Here are some options:

- Download a free EXIF viewer (e.g. Opanda.....but there are many more)

- Purchase an EXIF viewer (e.g. Opanda.....but there are many more)

- E-mail me the photos & I will do it for you (I would send you a Gmail address)

However.....

I truly do not think your photo as per this thread shows an alien.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 08:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

It made zero sound and was 1.5 ft by 1.5ft or a touch bigger. Yeah on the small side.



Ok, im no genius but if you look at the larger image you have uploaded more recently, it looks to be a LOT larger than 1.5ft, just in comparison to the chimneys, if it was that small it would have to be a lot lower to appear that big wouldnt it? And judging from the distance i would estimate it to be a good 20ft, maybe bigger as it looks quite high up.

Was 1.5ft a typo? or are we being invaded by the borrowers?



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 08:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by R3volutionary

Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

It made zero sound and was 1.5 ft by 1.5ft or a touch bigger. Yeah on the small side.



Ok, im no genius but if you look at the larger image you have uploaded more recently, it looks to be a LOT larger than 1.5ft, just in comparison to the chimneys, if it was that small it would have to be a lot lower to appear that big wouldnt it? And judging from the distance i would estimate it to be a good 20ft, maybe bigger as it looks quite high up.

Was 1.5ft a typo? or are we being invaded by the borrowers?


Maybe you are right. I was forwarded this some years back to file. They sent me small description of what happened. I never thought much of it and filed it away. I tried to estimate given the size of the house below. And the windows. I used a Interior design program to judge the size so it could be wrong.

If it is wrong i do apologize to people.

I will do this EXIF thing and post the resutls






edit on 093030p://f25Friday by L1U2C3I4F5E6R because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 09:04 PM
link   
I have a few UFO pics, even a day time one that private individuals sent to me around the same time. Never seen before. Im no expert on this subject thats for sure. But after the two i have posted so far I am now wary of what we see and what translate it to be.



posted on Sep, 25 2010 @ 07:34 AM
link   
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
 


Post your photo(s) to a site like ImageShack or Photobucket, the ATS Media portal re-encodes JPEG files and destroys the EXIF data, besides losing some more data because the file is compressed once more.



posted on Sep, 25 2010 @ 08:57 AM
link   
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
 


I, for one, am convinced. But I am curious about one thing my friend, perhaps you can enlighten me...

How do you know it is an alien?



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join