ALIEN? From my file another unseen Pic of Possible UFO with Alien or something!

the images do look interesting, but i do have my doubts because the photos look cgi.

I used to participate in another forum, they had some dandy blowups of orbs....
I swear that one of the blowups looked like the things was a miniature transparent rocket ship or similar.
This looks like another of the same....
Orbs when blown up have some pretty unique looking innerds that dont show up in the origonals.(usuallytoo far from the camera to show details in a nite photo.)
I reccommend trying it on any other orb pics one may have....Its surprising what youll see....
I almost came to the conclusion that orbs may be some form of transport for beings from another dimension ....
perhaps not all of them but some at any rate are more than what they seem when enlarged many times.

reply to post by stirling


That's because those "blowups" create their own artefacts.

There's now way of creating pixels that do not exist in the original, so we cannot trust in any "blowup".

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

 

Post your photo(s) to a site like ImageShack or Photobucket, the ATS Media portal re-encodes JPEG files and destroys the EXIF data, besides losing some more data because the file is compressed once more.

That is a very revealing statement of yours, if this is true then we all are wasting our time
with the ATS Media portal that serves only as a poor viewer instrument but since this Media
portal DESTROYS the important necessary EXIF element in our photographic evidences then
this portal is a bad resource, a wrong instrument don't you think? Destroying the evidence' s
root is outrageous and a waste of bandwith, that's unprofessional, don't you think ArMap OR
do you have a good explanation to justify this.

We may ask ourselves why Photobucket is so different and trustable at this level against the
ATS Media portal, why Photobucket is professionally designed to respect all the original
elements of a photographic evidence without altering any of them, then what is wrong with
our own Media portal, why do we have to use an external website to post our photographic
evidence instead our own service? Perhaps the ATS webmaster may answer this question.

Here we have a perfect example of a member who wants to post a photographic evidence
but the ATS Media portal does not serve the purpose because is destroying the EXIF data
over and over, this causes the unfair response of the members who are reacting against
the poster accusing him for not providing the original photo with the EXIF data and worse
there are suspicions of tampering the original photo, all this because no EXIF data is
exhibited but it is the ATS Media portal's fault because according to ArMap destroys the
so much required EXIF data, what a deception.

Not long ago I used my Photobucket channel to post pictures here in this forum and they
worked fine all the time but then the ATS Media portal sent the message that Photobucket
were not longer to work here and asked me to use the ATS Media portal wich I did but I
didn't knew that this portal would destroy the important element of each photo the EXIF.
Then it's clear to me the Media portal is not trustable and serves no usable purpose
than merely a common viewer. I wonder if the Photobucket service is working again here
in this forum because if ArMap is suggesting to use Photobucket instead of ATS Media
then has the policy changed? ATS what should we do now?

Its a harpy or an owl.

reply to post by ArMaP


Thanks for the Info. I will do that with some of the other pics i have.

Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

 

I, for one, am convinced. But I am curious about one thing my friend, perhaps you can enlighten me...

How do you know it is an alien?

I do not know. As my thread title says Possible Ufo with Alien? I have absolutely no idea. Thats why I posted it for people who may know a little more on it than me. I am definitely interested though in this subject.

If you wish to know about Fallen Angels and crap like that, im your girl. Even on the topic of god I am a fountain of knowledge, thats the Old Testament im talking about not the NEW and Improved version the New testament.

thanks though for the response.

Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
I do not know. As my thread title says Possible Ufo with Alien? I have absolutely no idea. Thats why I posted it for people who may know a little more on it than me. I am definitely interested though in this subject.

Then let me put it another way; what makes you suspect your captured anything?

It's clear that this is just a noisy image...quite what makes you leap to the conclusion that it is an ET I have no idea. You can't just enlarge a noisy signal and create new pixels- if the information isn't there then no about 'enhancement' will change that. I would say that you have a noisy picture, from which you are making patterns in that noise and enhancing a noisy signal will generate more rubbish.

Originally posted by free_spirit
Here we have a perfect example of a member who wants to post a photographic evidence
but the ATS Media portal does not serve the purpose because is destroying the EXIF data
over and over,

As a result, it also strips away any malicious "add-ons" that can happen when an unmanaged image uploading service is offered. There's good reason, but unfortunately it gets in the way.

However... we (ATS admin) have very-often posted that all anyone need do is contact us and arrange a secure transfer of any images wherein source data must be preserved for the examination of provenance. We've done it before, and it's always available as an option in these cases.

Heres a quick image I just took, and resized etc as in the OP with the EXIF data that goes with it.

Can anyone tell me how the data helps determine what the image is?

Just so I don't get accused of hoaxing I want to make it clear that IT IS NOT A UFO.

Original image (Resized to fit on ATS)
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/2ec848b521c2.jpg[/atsimg]

Mysterious objects when magnified 1600%
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7791f3172620.jpg[/atsimg]

Exif 1
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0def9c86d3bc.jpg[/atsimg]

Exif2
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b2bd846fd546.jpg[/atsimg]

How is the data helping to tell if this is a UFO or not?

reply to post by davespanners


The EXIF data shows the image was edited by Photoshop.

2nd line

reply to post by warlok


That is true, but in this case I only use photoshop to resize the image for ats. If I could have posted the image without resizing it that line wouldn't be there amd the rest of the data would still be exactly the same..

So how does it help?

ha ha,i have to say,i find it kinda hard to belive,as you telling me this alien dude,stuck his head out the window,as that what it kinda looks like,but jokes aside,you cant really see much apart from a blob of light,this would not sell papers,or go towards disclosure for the mass's...

reply to post by davespanners


That's just it.. Anyone who want's to examine the picture wants to see the original software number (corresponding with the camera model). If it says "Photoshop", the image could be tampered with. On the other hand, EXIF data isn't that hard to "hoax" so it doesn't say much.

Any chance you could provide a bit more information on the location?

Just so I can keep a look out myself.

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


I can't help but notice similarities between this photo and the one in your other post.

The shapes of the objects are very much alike and, looking at the designs, the houses could very well be from the same road.







In the other thread you say your sister took the photo. Though you don't mention her in this thread did she take both photos and are they taken from the same place but months apart? I feel there is something not quite right with your posts and claims.

reply to post by torsion


Torsion.....

For convenience & interest, I note L1U2C3I4F5E6R has answered you here & stated:

Hey there,

Thanks for the comments. The pics you referred to that I posted on another thread are from 2.9 miles down the road the year before.

I just had to find out where from and then measure on google maps.

The person who took the photo is no longer alive as he passed away but he gave me those pics a day after he took them.

I said the pic LOOKED like an alien. I did not SAY It WAS just asked if it did. The Houses in the surrounding area look very similar and are built at the same time.

This particular object has been seen by the residence of the area on separate occasions and too me are similar.

However the object my sis photoed is very different to the other one in my

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

Sooooo, which indiscernible blob would be the UFO and which indiscernible blob would be the alien?

I saw your outlines in the OP and read all the follow ups. I don't see anything.

Why is it that even with the advent of HD photography, every single UFO or alien picture is horribly distorted. No offense OP, but this is a stretch. I think you are trying to find something so bad, that you will make something out of anything.

Keep trying though, you will get something eventually.

PIC one: A flying potato, or an owl, or the moon.
PIC two: antennae?