It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Don't waste your time debating with people who will never change their minds, no matter how overwhelming and incontrovertible the evidence.
Originally posted by Pershing1973
Lets be honest if you wanted them to crash to the floor, isn't an aviation method a bit far fetched. If this was a conspiracy where are these planes? How did nobody see them being disposed of? What happened to the so called passengers and relatives? Has anyone a shred of proof that these planes were switched? If so who piloted them? Why would they do it?
Before I look at the possibility of demolition charges I would like the above answered with some evidence.
Among the most elaborate schemes was to "create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight."
Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs worked out a complex deception:
"An aircraft at Elgin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CJA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone [a remotely controlled unmanned aircraft]. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida."
"From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Elgin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency a "May Day" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MiG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft, which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO [International Civil Aviation Organization radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the U.S. what has happened to the aircraft instead of the U.S. trying to "sell" the incident."
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
reply to post by dereks
Yeah, yeah, we've heard your tired old "zero evidence" claims and "holographic planes" strawman arguments. Hundreds of times...
Originally posted by Pershing1973
Lets be honest if you wanted them to crash to the floor, isn't an aviation method a bit far fetched. If this was a conspiracy where are these planes? How did nobody see them being disposed of? What happened to the so called passengers and relatives? Has anyone a shred of proof that these planes were switched? If so who piloted them? Why would they do it?
Before I look at the possibility of demolition charges I would like the above answered with some evidence.
Are you aware that four different military exercises that "simulated" planes being hijacked and flown into buildings were being run on 9/11? As for specifics of what happened to the planes and passengers, only the PNAC neocon cabal can answer your questions, but have you ever heard of Operation Northwoods?
Among the most elaborate schemes was to "create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight."
Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs worked out a complex deception:
"An aircraft at Elgin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CJA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone [a remotely controlled unmanned aircraft]. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida."
"From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Elgin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency a "May Day" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MiG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft, which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO [International Civil Aviation Organization radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the U.S. what has happened to the aircraft instead of the U.S. trying to "sell" the incident."
BTW, these are direct quotes from James Bamford's Body of Secrets, coincidentally published in 2001. The debunkers always try to minimize the implications of Northwoods or falsely claim that even though it was approved by the JCS Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, it would never have become operational. Except it was -- 48 years later.
Originally posted by jazabel51
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
i say-the fact that 9-11 theorys arent going away could mean where there is smoke there is fire...
Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
Originally posted by jazabel51
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
i say-the fact that 9-11 theorys arent going away could mean where there is smoke there is fire...
This is again the logic that truthers seem to use. Just because it doesnt go away does not mean that there HAS to be something there. A lot of people say Elvis is still alive. But is he really? Its not going away. Doesn't make it true my friend.
Originally posted by o0?Wha?Who?o0
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
What proof do you have that it wasn't an inside job? How do you know it was only the work of Islamic terrorists? What do you really know about 9/11 and why do you think you have all the answers? If you don't believe in 9/11 truth then why do you care so much about what others are thinking? Since you care so much, why don't you post some evidence the truthers believe and debunk them 1 by 1.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
Someone asked me to prove that the OS is correct. I don't need to because that's the story. The truthers story is after the inital OS and lacks evidence so they need to show the PROOF to debunk the official story. If I claim i was captured by Aliens, then I am telling the truth till someone disproves my story.
This isn't how things work even in your mind. You can't possibly even realise what you are saying here.
Pretty much this says what ever story goes in your ear first is the truth. You're not for real.
Originally posted by logicalthinking
First off that was the most stupid video I have ever seen. Second lets start here.
government officials who were called to testify before the commission included:
George W. Bush - President; refused to testify under oath
Dick Cheney - Vice President; refused to testify under oath
Past government officials who were called to testify before the commission included:
Bill Clinton - former President; refused to testify under oath
Al Gore - former Vice President; refused to testify under oath
Why refuse to testify unless you have something to hide.
Originally posted by allprowolfy
here we go again, another noob that cannot think for themselves. Question op do you actually beleive that the pentagon hole was caused by a plane. if so take a look at the actual diminsions of the craft. 2) did you ever put two and two together just how fast they past the patriot act? Have you ever done any research into Nazi germany and the relivance of how Hitler got into office? then does it strike you that the bbc and cnn had told the public that the world trade had fallen 12 minutes before it actually fell? then last not least the new york fire fighters telling the public that they heard bombs? the truth is just this, get off your seat, go to new york and do some actual digging around like i did and guess what it will take you less than a day to be able to debunk just exactly what the governments actual claim is. sheesh tired of arm chair govt informants throwing vomit my way