Is this 9/11 nonsense going to ever go away? ZERO eveidence but still pushing on!

reply to post by GoldenFleece


Wow.

I believe this users frustrations stem from their inability to understand physics and comprehension. It's a shame that so many educated individuals saw a building being destroyed by controlled demolition under the pretense of "plane crash." Not because they're conspiracy theorist, because they're educated in the subject of controlled demolition and have most likely witnessed more than a few.

As "Lucy" stated in his rhetoric, it could have been the Gov. I don't believe many knew within our government, only key players, you know them. I believe Israel is the insider. You would have to be ignorant to believe religious extremists living in caves in a 3rd world country are capable of this.

PS: Lucifer does not offer atonement of sins nor eternal life. He offers an alternative to Christ.

Death

So "Lucy", you strive for death in this life, for pain in the next.

reply to post by stevcolx

So, there is NO other way the fall of WTC 7 can be explained?
Debunking 9/11: debunking911.com...

First responder: "You see where the white smoke is? You see this thing leaning like this? It's definitely coming down. There's no way to stop it. Cause you have to go up in there to put it out and it already - the structural integrity is just not there in the building. It's tough, it's.. it's.. You know we can handle just about anything, this is beyond...

So, there is NO evidence of a fire in WTC 7 before its collapse?
YouTube: WTC 7 News Report: Before Collapse

So, WTC 7 didn't receive damage from the twin tower collapse?
Image: debunking911.com...

I'd still like to how how the Trusters can possibly rationalize the fact that according to the FBI, there's no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11!

This has been know for 4 years now. I'm actually kinda fascinated by the ease in which people are so easily brainwashed by the government and corporate media.

I maintain that their psyche just can't handle the truth, so it rationalizes or dismisses anything that interferes with their worldview.

reply to post by GoldenFleece

From the source you are using:
news.bbc.co.uk...

That was before the release of the videotape showing Osama Bin Laden expressing pleasure that the attacks on America had gone even better than he hoped.

Looks like your source backfired.

Originally posted by GoldenFleece
I'd still like to how how the Trusters can possibly rationalize the fact that according to the FBI, there's no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11!

This has been know for 4 years now. I'm actually kinda fascinated by the ease in which people are so easily brainwashed by the government and corporate media.

I maintain that their psyche just can't handle the truth, so it rationalizes or dismisses anything that interferes with their worldview.

What evidential link do you expect to be in the public domain ? A letter ordering 9/11 from OBL to Mohamed Atta perhaps ? You think that likely ?

There is not actually a proved evidential link between Hitler and the holocaust or between Al Capone and the St Valentine's day massacre but there is no serious doubt about the ultimate responsibility.

shills go nuts when you talk about 9-11.

Originally posted by JohnJasper
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

 

As has been mentioned numerous times already, the evidence is overwhelmingly there, but nothing's going to happen because JUSTICE IS DEAD in the USA.

Oh! You mean like this evidence:debunking911.com... , which actually supports the official 9/11 news reports? Since the event itself speaks volumes, (terrorists attacked the United States), justice has already been served a hundred times over. I have faith in my fellow citizens. I have faith in the US military. I have faith in the human condition.

When I saw Bush's facial expressions on 9/11, I knew he felt the same horror as we all did. There was no conspiracy behind the attacks on 9/11/2001. It was a terrorist attack.

All these 9/11 conspiracy theories are just hobbyist, activist, and anarchist speculations.

9/11 Conspiracy theories are the conspiracy.

Originally posted by Alfie1
What evidential link do you expect to be in the public domain ?

You STILL don't get it?

OK, one more time: According to the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, THERE'S NO HARD EVIDENCE CONNECTING OSAMA BIN LADEN TO 9/11!

Sheesh, talk about denial.

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


Is this satire? It would be one of only a few plausible explanation for the OP, the video and your subsequent posts.

reply to post by GoldenFleece

If you read that piece of fiction, you will realize that it is the site owner's opinion. There is nothing factual about what he is saying. Even though he does supply articles (references), he is only giving you an interpretation as to what they mean to him. It is all speculation.

Snip from the page you provided...

We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary.

If you read the bottom of the page, you would have noticed that it was an opinion piece. We are showing you images and news clips taken on that day, and you are showing us a commentary. BIG difference in thinking.

Originally posted by GoldenFleece

Originally posted by Alfie1
What evidential link do you expect to be in the public domain ?

You STILL don't get it?

OK, one more time: According to the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, THERE'S NO HARD EVIDENCE CONNECTING OSAMA BIN LADEN TO 9/11!

Sheesh, talk about denial.

And, I say again, what do you expect ? written instructions ? Is that what Al Capone did in respect of the St Valentine's day massacre ? In the end the only charge he faced was income tax evasion.

reply to post by Alfie1


If the FBI thought he did it, why are they not charging him for the crime? They admitted there is no hard evidence. If they had evidence but didn't want to share it with the public, the spokeperson could simply have said that. The police do that frequently

Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by Alfie1

 

If the FBI thought he did it, why are they not charging him for the crime? They admitted there is no hard evidence. If they had evidence but didn't want to share it with the public, the spokeperson could simply have said that. The police do that frequently

So, where is the evidence to support your theory? If you are referring to the one that we just debunked, look up a few more posts to see my answer.

reply to post by Alfie1


Research is the truths best friend....yes it is collected in to one site but all sources i have verified and checked
I never just believe it...i check it.

But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:

"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (28)

You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?

[A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (29)

source

Originally posted by Section31
reply to post by GoldenFleece

 

If you read that piece of fiction, you will realize that it is the site owner's opinion. There is nothing factual about what he is saying. Even though he does supply articles (references), he is only giving you an interpretation as to what they mean to him. It is all speculation.

Are you ignorant or a professional liar?

Bin Laden, Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings?
By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, August 28, 2006

Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is a longtime and prominent member of the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted" list, which notes his role as the suspected mastermind of the deadly U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa on Aug. 7, 1998.

But another more infamous date -- Sept. 11, 2001 -- is nowhere to be found on the same FBI notice.

The curious omission underscores the Justice Department's decision, so far, to not seek formal criminal charges against bin Laden for approving al-Qaeda's most notorious and successful terrorist attack. The notice says bin Laden is "a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world" but does not provide details.

The absence has also provided fodder for conspiracy theorists who think the U.S. government or another power was behind the Sept. 11 hijackings. From this point of view, the lack of a Sept. 11 reference suggests that the connection to al-Qaeda is uncertain...

reply to post by LordBucket



Step 1. Google "How to Destroy a 9/11 Truther", find a video that's being facetious, but do not watch it.

Way to read the book by its cover, moo-ron. Still haven't watched that video yet, eh?

Step 2. Create a post in which the title is a deprecatory statement on, most likely, the largest conspiracy theory forum on the Web.

Well, it's all in the title, right? Gotta get those hits.

Step 3. Fill said post with frustrated opinion, repetitious rambling and contemptuous name calling... but not facts, or anything related to physics.

Burn!

Step 4. Sign off in time to watch re-run of Myth Busters. They're proving that American flags do ripple in the vacuum of space!

Oooo, a thread against moon truthers is in order!


I imagine that you are very much like the behavior you exhibit.

All cover, no substance.

I like how the OP contradicts itself by saying he/she researched/read everything on ATS about 911 but couldn't take 3 minutes to watch the video he/she posted.
Besides the avatar, I also like the name... LUCIFER. Just had to take all the numbers out.

OP, you say, regardless who committed 911 attacks, we should move on from this. Don't you think is fair to the victims (and in this case we are all victims one way or another) to know the real truth? or are you saying that if I kill some one all I have to do is just hide long enough until people or the family of the person murdered don't care anymore so I could get away with it?

Originally posted by Banjamin Jefferson Madiso

Originally posted by Alfie1


Quite right. Also, in a controlled demolition the detonations precede the collapse. Charges going off while the building is already collapsing would be pointless :-

www.youtube.com...

REALLY?!?!?! So please tell me exactly how many 110 storey buildings have you witnessed being brought down with explosive demolitions? I would wager the number is, ZERO! So you really would not have any reasonable idea of the sequence of the charges being set off while demolishing a skyscraper. Actually when demo-ing a building, the charges go off, and instantaneously, the structure comes down, at free fall. AND, yes, in some cases the structure begins to collapse while charges are still going off. You see, the freefall part is the dead giveaway that explosives were used on 9-11. Especially pertaining to WTC Bldg 7. It is pointless to argue with L1U2C3I4F5E6R, and even more pointless to agree with her...

Well then in that case, feel free to show us proof of this from your favorite source for information, youtube.

Well you know what....i am now going to also say thanks to the OP for one reason...It shows that there are so many people who are awke to the fact that the OS stinks in just soooooo many ways....and in the End it will be people whom seek the truth that will be rembered for not just caving in and following blindly into two Illegal wars where over a million INNOCENT people have been killed including members of families whom have been fighting on behalf of these people whom rose this false flag operation to meet their goals of filth and greed to achieve things that really are not of any importance except to their pitiful self glorified little heads.

People of the world are waking up and they are going to fight back...and we are going to be fighting back for all the right reasons....we are fighting to expose them...we are fighting to show the world the faces of the evil perpetrators.....I say now...that the rothchilds and rockerfellers of this world beware....We the people are no longer going to be trounced on by your insatiable greed at the expense of our loved ones.

reply to post by thegrayone


That seems to be exactly what the poster is saying; apparently history only goes in 10-year cycles.