It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Michael Cecil
No Knowledge of Genesis 1:27, 2:7., Chapter 3, especially, vs. 4-7 and 24 and
Chapter 16:13 &14. Check.
Originally posted by Michael Cecil
In the Book of Daniel, the Gospel of Matthew and the Revelation of John, the "Son of man" is described as coming "on the clouds of heaven", which is a description of the Vision Itself.
Thus, the only people who have any real Knowledge of the Revelation received by John are those who have, specifically, received that Vision.
Originally posted by Michael Cecil
In the Book of Daniel, the Gospel of Matthew and the Revelation of John, the "Son of man" is described as coming "on the clouds of heaven", which is a description of the Vision Itself.
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
Originally posted by Michael Cecil
I simply REFUSE to believe in any God Who talks only to Jews, only to Christians or only to Arabs.
Originally posted by dthwraith
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
I wouldn't bring this up, but sometimes a wall is just that, a wall.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
I now challenge you to demonstrate that these passages in Genesis support your teaching.
Not just SAY they support your teaching, which is all you've been doing so far.
DEMONSTRATE it.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
I don't believe your revelation should take precedence over the revelation of the original poster, that's all. Comparing notes is one thing. Usurping the topic, is another. It is unloving and disrespectful.
If Swedenborg said he was getting information direct from Jesus, then Swedenborg was a liar.
Originally posted by Michael Cecil
It is almost as if the Revelation of John is my wife.
And Disraeli is touching my wife.
My goal here is not merely to destroy this thread.
My goal here is to stop Disraeli from touching my wife.
I don't want to read ONE MORE WORD of Disraeli's assertions that he 'understands' the Revelation of John.
Of course, this is not something that is within my control.
Originally posted by Gaussq
If Swedenborg said he was getting information direct from Jesus, then Swedenborg was a liar.
"If a prophet arises among you, a dreamer of dreams...and if he says "let us go after other gods"...you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams." Deuteronomy ch13 vv1-3
Let us see here, what is a typical fake prophet?