It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I had a headache, so I took two aspirin, prayed to god, and my headache went away! Therefore, god is real!
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by nlouise
Whenever something goes wrong, God is the only name that comes up, as if Satan never existed or has no part in it. Not saying that athiests blame God, that woulds be absurd because an athiest would not believe in God to begin with(?!?!?!?) Those that point the finger at God could only be non-athiest. Correct?
It would appear to me that God is upfront on what he does, no secrets. It's the one that does things in secret that is the real danger. Logically it goes for people too. Know your enemy.
Even the atheist can look at the bible as a literary work and can comment on the actions of the characters accordingly.
Satan is mentioned as having killed in the bible and very specifically, just as god is, so we need not assume his actions behind the scenes. That being said, how can one overlook the moral ambivalence present in the bible: where the "good guy" (god) comes off as an anti-hero type and the "bad guy" seems relatively tame by comparison?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
reply to post by nlouise
That is an interesting story. It reminds me of a common saying in skeptic circles:
I had a headache, so I took two aspirin, prayed to god, and my headache went away! Therefore, god is real!
So was it the praying or was it the aspirin? Here you are regularly visiting doctors and regularly visiting church. You become healed of your afflictions. Because of regular church visits you would have associated the healing with the cathlolic church, the southern baptist or the new church you went to with the elders; whichever was the last one you attended before healing. Yet curiously you didn't associate the healing with doctor visits and/or the resiliency of youth and/or the power of positive thinking. At any rate, I'm glad to hear that you got better from such an awful affliction.
Can we say god is real from an episode such as this? Maybe, maybe not. There seems to be explanations other than the supernatural. Otherwise, if the invisible can affect the physical world we could have tested the elders to determine if their prayer incantations had a healing affect and if so, determine the agent involved in the process. Without such confirmation and with other explanations available, should we apply occam's razor or should we not?
Originally posted by nlouise
Lets say I wrote a biography about my life and included insight that I thought others could learn by. Lets say that there was also an antagonist in my life that was out to destroy not only me, but others. I'm going to mention who this antagonist is and the attributes of this antagnoist and warn against him, but I will not base my biography and the goal of my biography on the life of the antagonist, because that is not what my biography is about.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Your argument is basically innocent of one crime, innocent of all crime.
What more can you say on assumption in your argument?
Originally posted by nlouise
God used the elders that prayed, but the elders themselves have no healing power.
Can we say god is real from an episode such as this? Maybe, maybe not. There seems to be explanations other than the supernatural. Otherwise, if the invisible can affect the physical world we could have tested the elders to determine if their prayer incantations had a healing affect and if so, determine the agent involved in the process.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by nlouise
God used the elders that prayed, but the elders themselves have no healing power.
And there's the issue up for debate. How do we know for certain god did it and if he had that kind of power why would he need to use the elders? How can we rule out those frequent doctor visits and medical treatments as a possible cause? If there are likely natural explanations why would we first assume the least likely supernatural explanations?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by nlouise
Lets say I wrote a biography about my life and included insight that I thought others could learn by. Lets say that there was also an antagonist in my life that was out to destroy not only me, but others. I'm going to mention who this antagonist is and the attributes of this antagnoist and warn against him, but I will not base my biography and the goal of my biography on the life of the antagonist, because that is not what my biography is about.
Okay, but why make yourself out to be far more murderous than the alleged enemy? Why also would you give that enemy the permission to kill others (the only killings that satan did in the book)? The "old testament" is chock full of hideous and morally dubious acts committed by the biblical god.
How do we know 'AIR' exists? Can we use the 5 senses to prove it
God is fairly specific about the crimes that earn punishment. Even in David's case. Yet David wasn't really punished; 70K of his people were punished with death for his crime. He killed tens of thousands of innocents. God didn't specify their crimes. You haven't either. You simply assume they must have been guilty. Sorry, but not a convincing argument.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by nlouise
How do we know 'AIR' exists? Can we use the 5 senses to prove it
Not in anyway do I mean to join this sudden dog pile on OP BUT,
Also how do we know you are even capable of love or that anybody could ever feel love for you? Can you prove it? It's obvious you have a campaign against the possibility you are a creation and not just growth.
I'm not piling on OP, not my intention. OP and I in a previous post were discussing tangible proof, and such. I was only asking a question to add to our discussion. -Good points from you, can't see love, how do we know we are capable or if it is real? Other things that can't be seen are NSEW directions, or time in increments, unless observed by some other measure.
God is fairly specific about the crimes that earn punishment. Even in David's case. Yet David wasn't really punished; 70K of his people were punished with death for his crime. He killed tens of thousands of innocents. God didn't specify their crimes. You haven't either. You simply assume they must have been guilty. Sorry, but not a convincing argument.
You shall not behave thus toward the LORD your God, for every abominable act which the LORD hates they have done for their gods; for they even burn their sons and daughters in the fire to their gods. (Deuteronomy 12:31)
[edit on 29-8-2010 by randyvs]
This part I am not sure if you are addressing to me or not. If so, I don't understand what you are getting at or asking, or saying.
Are you showing me the reference to something I said when I said I missed this part of the conversation about David?
RANDYVS: Was the last post for me or the OP?
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by nlouise
RANDYVS: Was the last post for me or the OP?
Damn it . I don't understand how that happened but I'm sure I must have clicked on the wrong post. It was meant for OP but as always all comments are welcome. Apologies for the confusion. Simply my bad.
Originally posted by DOADOA
a little history of religion for all of you.
in the beginning when law began to form, religion was what kept people doing the right thing. religion was good, the people who followed them were good. there intentions were pure and hell did not exist. god loved everyone and he didn't need your donation.
then came worshiping, this was when religion took a turn for the worst. people have now realized that by being a representative of god, they hold power. from power came greed. this lead to the twisted lies. they either add or subtract the words of god til it suited their need, this was when religion was modified from its original version. god was altered beyond recognition by the people who needed him to be merciless. as such, wars were fought in his name, many were force to convert or die.
in the present, our religion continue to evolve, although god no longer spoke to us we can still modify the words that he has already spoken. even today, if you wanted to be married into a catholic family, you either convert or lose the love of your life. this is unfortunate and god had never intended for his good will to end up being a tool for greed and control.
satan is not a being who dwell in the underworld, we are satan, we betrayed god and his word. our name is legion for we are many.
[edit on 29-8-2010 by DOADOA]
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Drummer
niouise
I think this passage fits .
You shall not behave thus toward the LORD your God, for every abominable act which the LORD hates they have done for their gods; for they even burn their sons and daughters in the fire to their gods. (Deuteronomy 12:31)
[edit on 29-8-2010 by randyvs]
You are right, it does pertain. Murder is an abominable act in the eyes of God. If mankind had been left to his own devices the Messianic bloodline would not have been preserved. Satan went out of his way to destroy the Messianic bloodline so that Jesus could not be born and fullfill the old covenant prophecy, and make atonement for the ushering in of the new covenant. Certain groups were taken out of the way to see it through.
Side note: (pertaining to that scripture) That same thing still goes on today during the Sabats and at the Groves, in certain castles of Europe, and all done in secret. God knows everything and he hates it! When they build the new future temple in Jerusalem, he will detest their animal sacrifices too. They already have 6 red heffers and they only need 2.