It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by nlouise
Spirituality, no matter which side of the fence it is on, is something that can't be explained. When you KNOW, no one can tell you different.
"Spirituality" really has no value as a word. Describe specifically what you're referring to.
Human actions can definately be under the influence of the spirit world, and those actions are indicative as to which one.
Prove it.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Clement of Rome was Peter's direct disciple
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
and Polycarp was John's.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Not made up. God says all humanity is damned for they are sinful criminals.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Oh yes it does matter. Because as you have failed to answer, you have no means of knowing what they were guilty or innocent of.
Originally posted by Gorman91
You're whole argument is that because they were not guilty of one crime they were not guilty of A crime. What are you, Basil Marceaux?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
reply to post by nlouise
Most of what you've described are simply transcendental experiences or matters of intuition or emotion. All too often these are attributed to god, gods, spirits, etc. The problem comes in proving how something that originates within you can be sourced to something outside you and invisible. You claim to know god but have no way to verify it objectively nor prove it to others...
Originally posted by nlouise
I'm sorry that you feel that way.
I look at all the martyrs of the Bible and the most logical question I would have is this........If these men didn't believe so strongly that God was real, would they have allowed themselves to be heinously tortured, hung upside down on crosses, burned at stakes, and thrown into lion pits? For a person to go so far, knowing that this would be the end game, they must have known something or believed beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
reply to post by nlouise
Someone else thinking or feeling something also doesn't prove anything but the conviction of those people. That is also subjective. How can any of this be proven objectively?
That would indicate a machine. And because this is not some cellular organ that can evolve, but rather the very physical laws of the universe, this machine would require a creator.
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by nlouise
I'm sorry that you feel that way.
I look at all the martyrs of the Bible and the most logical question I would have is this........If these men didn't believe so strongly that God was real, would they have allowed themselves to be heinously tortured, hung upside down on crosses, burned at stakes, and thrown into lion pits? For a person to go so far, knowing that this would be the end game, they must have known something or believed beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Who said they didn't believe?
I'm sure they believed fully that they were doing the right thing, but it doesn't make what they believe true.
Originally posted by nlouise
The only real proof is personal, and the person who wants that proof has to go to God for him/herself. No one can do it for them. God makes himself known to those who sincerely want to know. I'm not talking about belief. People believe in all kinds of crazy things, and yes that doesn't mean they are right.
Originally posted by Gorman91
That would indicate a machine. And because this is not some cellular organ that can evolve, but rather the very physical laws of the universe, this machine would require a creator.