It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
reply to post by Pimander
Yes, you did...I forgot! Thank you. For me, its a polarized issue. The left side of my brain tells me something top secret and probably related to Nazi engineering was tested and crashed out there, while my right brain tells me something of extraterrestrial origin crashed that day in July 1947. The kicker for me is this, while Ill admit that there is a good possibilty that it was alien, and I dont discount the possibility, it is still difficult for me to believe the more fantastical portions, like we recovered bodies, etc. AS IF ANYTHING CRASHING TO EARTH NOT OF TERRESTRIAL ORIGIN ISNT FANTASTIC ENOUGH! Ha ha, does that make sense? Its difficult to articulate. I have felt that my best explanation is that we maybe recovered a probe. All debris, no bodies. I dont know:-) Sometimes I think I have it str8 and other times I dont.
I think its suspicious the military changed its story 5 times. In regards to the first announcement that a saucer was recovered, I think that was the only honest statement. I dont believe routine Project Mogul components would have nessitated the amount of logistics that were carried out that week, like the influx of troops, high ranking officers, and the flights to Fort Worth and to Wright Field for debris. Seems like alot of resources mobilized for a top secret listening balloon. I dont really think advanced rocket technology would have caused all that commotion either.
So what does it leave us with?
It was the crash test dummies that were dropped in the 50s. The six foot tall dummies with normal sized heads!
Originally posted by ilian51378
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't project Mogul carried starting in 1952? They came up with this excuse in later years when people didn't necessarily remember exactly when Mogul was carried out, but I read that it wasn't carried out until 1952... If that is true, then that explanation went out the window...
OK mate, time to get the can opener out.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
reply to post by Pimander
You're right...it's a giant can of worms! Shall we open it?
That they are not just claiming that the documentation is missing is interesting. That means they must KNOW that it has been destroyed. Yes, they must have documents that indicate that it was destroyed or someone involved admitted that they knew about it. Very suspicious....
Originally posted by Cosmic911
Now, in order to find out that all documentation was destroyed, there had to be documentation stating all documentation was destroyed. Isn't that odd too?
Originally posted by Pimander
That they are not just claiming that the documentation is missing is interesting. That means they must KNOW that it has been destroyed. Yes, they must have documents that indicate that it was destroyed or someone involved admitted that they knew about it. Very suspicious....
Originally posted by Cosmic911
Now, in order to find out that all documentation was destroyed, there had to be documentation stating all documentation was destroyed. Isn't that odd too?