It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sassyncute
NO the approval was for a Mosque. Only a hand full of people have called it a cultural learning centre or whatever. the approval that was backed by Bloomberg was for a Mosque!!!!
[edit on 11-8-2010 by sassyncute]
Originally posted by sassyncute
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
We can get past it. If the idiots with the real agendas stop their noise.
This person is saying all those protesting over the Mosque who probably lost family are Idiots for not getting past it.
Yeah well done Lucy or whatever your name is.
Check out all these idiots who are protesting like we are. If I was allowed to insult you on here (for which i am not) I would make you cry.
Lucidity thinks these people are idiots
Originally posted by sassyncute
Source1
Source 2
A city commission on Tuesday denied landmark status to a building near the World Trade Center site, freeing a group to convert the property into an Islamic community center and mosque that has drawn national opposition.
VIDEO NEWS SOURCE CALL IT A MOSQUE Watch this one
Source3 simliar to source 2 but no mention of Community centre only Mosque
Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who last week made an impassioned defense of the project planned for lower Manhattan, also had no immediate comment.
Source4 Mosque first then center
[edit on 11-8-2010 by sassyncute]
New York City government officials, led by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, had approved the project all along. Bloomberg defended it, saying, "Everything the United States stands for and New York stands for is tolerance and openness."
Originally posted by sassyncute
reply to post by intrepid
You asked for a source that say "Mosque" each one of the one i used say Mosque. It has always been a mosque. They later over time have changed the wording to a Community centre. Still a mosque for Allah lovers.
Originally posted by sassyncute
NO the approval was for a Mosque. Only a hand full of people have called it a cultural learning centre or whatever. the approval that was backed by Bloomberg was for a Mosque!!!!
Still a damn Mosque though in place where 3000 people where blown to little tiny bits by some Islamic Jihadists.
Why not build a hospital for the new Healthbill. Then next time crap gets blown up an extra hospital will come in handy.
Batting .000? Are you referring to an american sport?
That the people have an equal, natural, and unalienable right freely and peaceably to exercise their religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that no religious sect or society ought to be favored or established by law in preference to others.
Originally posted by sassyncute
read Bloombergs defense of the MOSQUE
Bloomberg defends Mosque
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by sassyncute
read Bloombergs defense of the MOSQUE
Bloomberg defends Mosque
Your Google isn't working that well. Bloomberg says, "mosque and community center". The only place it says just "mosque" is in the title of the article. That editorial freedom.
But thanks for the link. It's going to come in handy.
Originally posted by sassyncute
He still says Mosque. I am still searching for my article from last week. And he still get teary eyed over his supports of a religious Islamic building. Ironic seeming he is Jewish (pronounced: muny-bag-s)
Originally posted by c g henderson
reply to post by tungus
You mean that this is the first Mosque to be build in the US?
We are finally letting them build a Mosque because they crashed planes on 9/11? Who did? The people building this mosque crashed planes? I thought the people on the planes died? I thought we had Mosques in this country before 9/11? Can you clarify?
Originally posted by sassyncute
reply to post by intrepid
You asked for a source that say "Mosque" each one of the one i used say Mosque. It has always been a mosque. They later over time have changed the wording to a Community centre. Still a mosque for Allah lovers.
I am trying to find my original news source and will reply to you.
Still a damn Mosque though in place where 3000 people where blown to little tiny bits by some Islamic Jihadists. Why not build a hospital for the new Healthbill. Then next time crap gets blown up an extra hospital will come in handy.
Batting .000? Are you referring to an american sport?
[edit on 11-8-2010 by sassyncute]
Rauf's book suggests that the “American Constitution and system of governance uphold the core principles of Islamic law” (i.e., sharia). The author concludes, therefore, that the “American political structure is sharia-compliant.” In December 2007 Rauf promoted What's Right with Islam at a Malaysia gathering of Hizb ut Tahrir, which seeks to impose sharia on the United States and other countries worldwide.
Originally posted by MY2Commoncentsworth
A few facts about our Imam
Rauf's book suggests that the “American Constitution and system of governance uphold the core principles of Islamic law” (i.e., sharia). The author concludes, therefore, that the “American political structure is sharia-compliant.” In December 2007 Rauf promoted What's Right with Islam at a Malaysia gathering of Hizb ut Tahrir, which seeks to impose sharia on the United States and other countries worldwide.
www.discoverthenetworks.org...
In a June 2005 interview, Rauf was asked whether non-Muslims should be troubled by the Qur'an's assertion that people from other religious traditions should be mistreated, subjugated, or killed. Rauf replied that “many of these verses were revealed in certain contexts where the Prophet [Muhammad] and his followers were not allowed to practice their religion,” and thus “permission was granted to the Muslims to fight those who fought them for that reason.” “The vast history of Islam through the 14 centuries of history,” Rauf added, “has proven that except for certain moments in history, the predominant attitude of Muslims toward non-Muslims, especially to Jews and Christians, was one of friendship, was one of engagement.” In 2009, Rauf took up this theme again, writing: “Religious freedom is at the core of Islam.”