It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aesir26
No. Learn Hebrew and gematria.
Originally posted by dave13
- You have listened to an Italian mass, well I listen to a Croatian mass for the last 40 years.
- 13 is JESUS, Chapter 13 in the Revelation was written against Jesus.
Originally posted by dave13
JESUS WAS THE OPPONENT
to the leaders who crucified him and they wrote the Revelation against him.
Originally posted by dave13
Yeshua is JESUS true Name in Aramaic
Originally posted by dave13
REVELATION IS 100 PERCENT AGAINST JESUS...
I HAVE NOT ENOUGH TIME TO GO THROUGH EVERY CHAPTER IN THE REVELATION.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by MrCobb
Consider the nature of the book Revelation.
This is a Christian book.
It is focussing on the figure of Christ,who dominates the first and last chapters and keeps popping up in between.
It focusses on the death and resurrection of Christ as the power that drives the salvation narrative and brings about the downfall of the persecutors (this comes out in ch1, ch5, ch12).
It is addressed to the Christian community, encouraging them to stand firm against those who are trying to break down their faith in God and his Christ.
Now, that kind of book is hardly going to identify Christianity as the enemy, which is the message in your linked thread.
That won't be what it means.
Originally posted by Mr Cobb
I guess he forgot to read the 7 letters to the 7 churches where Jesus matter-of-factly tells 5 of the churches "you are miserable- either repent, or be destroyed":
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by ElohimJD
Thank you for those comments.
I am a student of history, as well as a student of theology. In fact I was a student of history first.
So i could find one or two flaws in your survey of history.
For example, it was Charlemagne, not Justinian, who famously got himself crowned by the Pope, and you got Napoleon and Bismarck in the wrong order.
However, the point I really want to challenge is the significance of the year 1583. I would not agree that this year was the turning point separating England from Rome. The real decision had already been made in the Act of Supremacy of 1559. Even then, Elizabeth was anticipated in the previous generation by her father, Henry VIII.
I think you may be guilty of the sin of arguing backwards from the intended conclusion.
In other words, instead of basing your calculation on the important year 1583, you may have fixed on the year 1583 because it fitted your calculations.
That is my one of my objections to the whole business of trying to calculate dates for the end-times.
As with using gematria to work out the meaning of "666", it's only too easy to juggle the figures to make them arrive at the number you want.
I wrote a thread on the subject;
Revelation prophecy; The futility of date-setting
edit on 15-11-2012 by DISRAELI because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dave13
READ THE KURAN AND STUDIED NEARLY EVERY RELIGION IN THE WORLD, SO PLEASE DONT TELL ME THAT I HAVE NOT READ A FEW PAGES OF THE REVELATION.