The infamous Turkey UFO a yacht?

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by nerbot

 

...The percentage of boats that will not use the anchor or navigation lights is few and far between...

But they still exist

This is a second line.

This is what a third line would look like if I had typed one.

reply to post by adigregorio


I have a question and that is why can't you see any other part of this yacht especially right under the window or anything else in the front or back of the window. With the closeup of this window you would see something else that is in the vicinity of that window. Unless this yacht was painted black or being hidden by something else that only allowed the window to be shown you would see something else on the vessel, say like railings the top of the deck under the window you know things like that.

Originally posted by adigregorio

Originally posted by FlySolo

Originally posted by Chadwickus

adigregorio;

The light in A is clearly reflecting off the exterior.

Really? How about some proof of this "clarity" for I, obviously, don't see it. IN FACT I see the string of lights in the picture A. The exact same as the string in C, only from the outside vs inside.

The concave shape comparison can be used infinitely, its a geometric shape. If the light source really is from the interior then the window is much smaller than the example given of the yacht. Actually discrediting the hypothesis further.

More claims, no evidence.

At least Chadwickus threw in some evidence with his...

Evidence of what?? geometry? The rim on the object is reflecting in A. What string of lights? you're seeing things dude.

If that rim that I call a reflection is what you call a window then you want evidence? Sorry, I can't provide you with common sense. That window/reflection is only about 1/8 of the entire object. What's all that below that sliver of width you call a window shining light from the interior? Are we even talking about the same thing cause if we are then I can't tolerate this ignorance anymore

Could someone give me some context here? What exactly is supposed to be the ufo? Is the person filming from inside a boat? What is that curvature? I really don't know what I'm looking at here. I see something that looks like a boat in some of the film, but most of it is this shiny thing with a curvature...is that the ufo or simply the environment outside?

Oh, and mods please ban paradigm2012. I've never seen another person at this site that so thoroughly tries to hijack threads
It's a distraction.

NO YACHT!!!

Originally posted by Threadfall
Could someone give me some context here? What exactly is supposed to be the ufo? Is the person filming from inside a boat? What is that curvature? I really don't know what I'm looking at here. I see something that looks like a boat in some of the film, but most of it is this shiny thing with a curvature...is that the ufo or simply the environment outside?

Oh, and mods please ban paradigm2012. I've never seen another person at this site that so thoroughly tries to hijack threads

It's a distraction.

Mr.Tolga Özdeniz
ATV Channel - Programme Editor
On January 31, 2008, a MiniDV format video cassette holding 35 minutes of footage was brought over to “TUBITAK” The Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey’s (a Scientific Institution owned by the state that is highly reliable and influential) National Observatory (TUG) by Mr.Tolga Ozdeniz, the Editor of “Reporter” that has been aired on ATV Channel. The footage on the cassette was said to have been recorded by a Canon GL1 MiniDV digital camera on a beach of a holiday village in Kumburgaz/Istanbul by an amateur.
The images were examined by TUG- National Observatory Image Processing Unit. Because, it would take quite a long time to analyze all of the images, only randomly selected parts were pre-examined. During this process, emphasis was not placed on images produced by optical clarification effects which a number of point light sources generated.
The examination of these frames has yielded following results:
The images were recorded in digital NTSC format by above-mentioned camera.
The date on the video indicates that the recordings were made during 2007, 2008, and 2009.
The footage images of the object which visibly have a certain configuration are not computer animations, special video effects or studio re-created images or models. The footage is genuine…
The first observation made from the footage is that some of the images were recorded in nighttime sky at a certain altitude from the horizon. The footage also covers images of moon in some parts which proves that the video was shot in nighttime and open air. But, the fact that digital date display’s showing AM in certain frames and PM in others, raises suspicion about the validity of the time in which the recordings were made.
Since in some parts, there is no other object that can be featured as a reference in the close-up frames and no observable differences were found on background examination, the actual location, distance, dimensions and nature of the objects could not have been determined.
Through the examination of shootings of multiple dates, it’s a strong possibility that 2-3 different objects were captured. However, it’s difficult to determine whether the objects are moving or not. Their movement is slow even if they do so.
The reflections of light on the objects are sometimes caused by moon which was in a convenient location at that time, and sometimes produced by some other sources of light…
The light reflection from the left side of the object which is seen on August 10th shootings is not produced by the moon. At that time, the moon was in a phase that was pretty close to the “new moon” phase and located approximately at a 10 degrees proximity/angle to the horizon. Moreover, the image processing analysis conducted on some part of the footage revealed that the center of the object has the same density as its background, namely is of a transparent nature.
In conclusion, even though a detailed analysis of the footage is conducted, it might still remain unidentified. Hence, other reference objects need to be recorded in the same frame with the disputable object and further shootings need to be done by ourselves with special equipment in the same location and conditions.
Accordingly, the term “UFO” (Unidentified Flying Object) which has been used for these sort of dubious objects can also be used for these objects . But, this definition does not mean that these objects are from extraterrestrial (flying saucer etc.) origin.
Prof. phD. Zeki EKER
Director
National Observatory of TUBITAK

reply to post by Paradigm2012


You're right! That looks more like yacht windows to me.

As for why you can't see the rest of the yacht. It isn't made out of lights.

Why can you see the windows? They have lights directly behind them.

Assuming these are windows of a yacht, Occam's razor sure says they should be.

Located in Turkey, Sirius UFO Space Sciences Research Centre website is not available in english. For details and reports contact Haktan Akdogan, the chairman of Sirius.
The Turkey UFO sightings were a series of videotaped and documented UFO sightings by Yalcin Yalman, a night guard in Turkey. They started in 2007 and occurred again between May and September 2008, mostly while the sky was dark (between 8:00pm and 5:00am) although some of the video is taken at dawn, out over a body of water.. In 2009 Yalcin was able to film much clearer images when the sighting occured again over the Sea of Marmara near Instanbul. This case has been welcomed with open arms by the Sirius UFO Space Science Research Center in Turkey, calling the video "the most important UFO images ever."
In 2008, Yalman provided the Sirius UFO Space Science Research Center with about two and a half hours of footage from the four month period. The Center went through the footage frame-by-frame and interviewed people who claimed to have witnessed one or more of the incidents. The chairman of the UFO Research Center, Haktan Akdogan, said that "after conducting all of the analysis we came to the conclusion that this video footage is 100 per cent genuine." Akdogan also said that it was concluded that the objects sighted that have physical and material structures are not airplanes or helicopters, nor are they any kind of space phenomenon (i.e. planets, meteorites etc...), nor are they the result of natural or atmospheric disturbances. The Sirius UFO Center is also optimistic about the evidence that this video shows regarding alien life. Akdogan said that, in addition to the metallic structures of the UFOs sighted, "in the close-up of some footages [sic] of the objects, entities in them can be distinctly made out."[1][3]
Akdogan added, "now it is a time for world governments to acknowledge the reality of UFOs."

Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by Paradigm2012

 

You're right! That looks more like yacht windows to me.

As for why you can't see the rest of the yacht. It isn't made out of lights.

Why can you see the windows? They have lights directly behind them.

Assuming these are windows of a yacht, Occam's razor sure says they should be.

Me or you cannot see a yacht.

Because THERE IS NO YACHT

see how logic thinking works?

[edit on 18-7-2010 by Paradigm2012]

reply to post by Threadfall

As I see the hypothesis presented in the OP:
The "close up" of the UFO is videoed from the bridge of a yacht, looking forward. The curved shape of the UFO is the inner edge of the gunwale at the bow being illuminated by the interior lights of the yacht. This would make the "aliens" the anchor line roller at the center of the bow. This is borne out by the consistency of the the angle and lighting in the various views.

It may be difficult for those who have not been on the bridge of a motor yacht to visualize, but it is a possibility.

Something like this, at night.


[edit on 7/18/2010 by Phage]

sorry Yacht Theory Huggers.



OOPSIE NO YACHT VISIBLE.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Threadfall

 

As I see the hypothesis presented in the OP:
The "close up" of the UFO is videoed from the bridge of a yacht, looking forward. The curved shape of the UFO is the inner edge of the gunwale at the bow being illuminated by the interior lights of the yacht. This would make the "aliens" the anchor line roller at the center of the bow. This is borne out by the consistency of the the angle and lighting in the various views.

It may be difficult for those who have not been on the bridge of a motor yacht to visualize, but it is a possibility.

as we can see there is No Yacht.

Believing in things that DO NOT EXSIST is not good science.

reply to post by Paradigm2012


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/576ca247a019.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9471d4d3f82b.png[/atsimg]

Sure looks the same to me.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Threadfall

 

As I see the hypothesis presented in the OP:
The "close up" of the UFO is videoed from the bridge of a yacht, looking forward. The curved shape of the UFO is the inner edge of the gunwale at the bow being illuminated by the interior lights of the yacht. This would make the "aliens" the anchor line roller at the center of the bow. This is borne out by the consistency of the the angle and lighting in the various views.

It may be difficult for those who have not been on the bridge of a motor yacht to visualize, but it is a possibility.

If you have a big imagination and you can see things that do not exsist.
If you can squint really hard
If you molded your wording to suit your desires
If you want a yacht to be there really bad

Then you can see the Yacht

But if you do not do the listed above^ it is impossible to see a Yacht

WHOOPSIE

NO BOAT IN THAT ONE EITHER

Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by Paradigm2012

 

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/576ca247a019.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9471d4d3f82b.png[/atsimg]

Sure looks the same to me.

OOPPS Someone missed this!

What the heck man?

Do you feel the need to spam? I put all of my pictures in one post, and even added some "talent" to them.

They sure look like those windows to me, don't they?

Originally posted by adigregorio

Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by Paradigm2012

 

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/576ca247a019.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9471d4d3f82b.png[/atsimg]

Sure looks the same to me.

OOPPS Someone missed this!

What the heck man?

Do you feel the need to spam? I put all of my pictures in one post, and even added some "talent" to them.

They sure look like those windows to me, don't they?

Did you draw that with your crayon? Can you show a decent post with something not laugable?

Your crayon art makes me look very very very very good.

reply to post by Paradigm2012


My art might make you look "good" but your insults do not.

Do they not resemble the windows?

Is that too hard to answer?

Everyone look at this posters best evidence or analysis.

Does this look like a boat to you?

Did he draw it with crayon in desperation?

Originally posted by Paradigm2012




Everyone look at this posters best evidence or analysis.

Does this look like a boat to you?

Did he draw it with crayon in desperation?

Does it look like THE WINDOWS.

I never said boat, you are a liar now. (Not an insult, fact.)