The infamous Turkey UFO a yacht?

reply to post by Chadwickus


Chadwickus.....

I refer to the video fleabit posted here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here’s the video:

www.in.com...

I refer to my frame-grab at 2.07:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/295ab8911748.jpg[/atsimg]

I am aware of videos of this case that have been "butchered" with inserts, etc...

I am also aware of the "shower head" comparisons that have been made.

Do you know if this video has been embellished with a “shower head” comparison as per this frame-grab?

The time marks suggest not, but then again the background is so dark, skulduggery is possible.

Or, does this “frame grab” show more of the object?

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by QuantumDeath
Tell you what it fails to explain. The beings, with the big heads.

Originally posted by King Loki
lol a few blobs on the screen and you guys are saying alien instantly ??? what about humans ??? they look more like people to me but most of all they look like blobs ... if your familiar with a term called matrixing you'll understand what your brain is doing with these images ... ill give you the definition.


Matrixing: tendency for the human mind to interpret sensory input (that which is perceived visually, audibly or tactilely) as something familiar or more easily understood and accepted, and in effect mentally "filling in the blanks". ...

The natural tendency for the human mind to organize sensory input into something recognizable, such as seeing a face on the Moon.

The minds ability to find something familiar in an image that it doesn't quite understand or recognize


and that my friends is what your seeing ... plain and simple ... that and a super over active imagination.

any questions ?

[edit on 17/7/10 by King Loki]

Yeah. And how does this explain the past s*** explanations? Hmmmm? Flying lighthouses responsible for the sighting at Rendelsham Forest? Intelligent space junk that can turn? Oh, it must be "Matrixing" for all the people in Stephenville TX for all the people that saw the craft? Just fillin in the gaps huh? Starting to sound more like that document I read when I took a trip to Roswell, NM and visited the UFO Museum. Methods for Disinformation, Discredit, etc. Last but not least? Mass Hallucination? As soon as I read that up for "Explanations" on some of the most Mass Witnessed UFO sightings, I just stopped there. The stupidity became overwhelming as faceless a**holes posted crap like we were leaking '___' into the watersystem.

Look, I'm not going to care how much intelligence someone is putting in to twist sightings in their own little way. If your own the Disinformation Bandwagon, bringing in the payroll, I'm not going to listen.

There's something out there the is "Unknown" to the public, but has been carefully studied behind our backs by organizations, and they know what they are. Thats where you get all this "Need to Know" B*******.

Soon, we're going to roll over every one of these people like in the game "Red Faction: guerilla" Leave nobody standing involved, and raid the facilities. Thats the way it should be. Just don't be on the list when it happens.

reply to post by QuantumDeath



go back and have a look at my edited post on page 7 .. its just matrixing at work i have proven it beyond doubt pretty much ... i can make like 20 diff pics from that one picture.


actually ill repost some of it here again for you.

OH LOOK its a horse (in the bigger red circle) eating another aliens head (in the smaller red circle) .... damn those meat eating cannibal horses ... damn them to hell.

AND OMFG some creepy dude peeking out spying on us (in the yellow circle) ... need i go on ?





[edit on 17/7/10 by King Loki]

reply to post by Kratos40

Doesn't anyone else find it odd that the angle of all the screen captures appears to be identical? Videos taken so long apart yet the object is angled the same in each?
Let me grab some more screen shots from the videos.

reply to post by King Loki


that is very true, matrixing has quite an effect on a lot of enhanced or zoomed in pics. Our mind is programmed to make weird shapes and designs look more familiar. i dont think anyone should make the judgement those are aliens in the picture. I do think for the situation (UFO sighting) and the appearance of the long skinny neck and large heads i can see how people thnk it is aliens, i guess anything is possible..

This is a very interesting case and I think the OP's theory is plausible. Its really cool reading this thread and hearing all the different opinions from some of our best members. I wish I could find the photo showing a certain frame from this sighting, i've only seen the particular frame screencapped on a newspaper from turkey. In the particular frame, the UFO is completely lit up in different colors and odd design. If you watch the video it happens so fast you dont even notice, thus making it hard to find so i could post it here.

Keep up the good work here I am very interested in reading everyones thoughts on this case.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by hinsch

 

www.uforc.com...

Phage.....

This raises another of my concerns about this case.

I see a conflict of interest pertaining to this report.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not


Good call MMN

If only we had debris's input on the matter

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a30cfa626db8.jpg[/atsimg]

If the object is hovering in the sky over the ocean, and the object above it is the moon, then where is the light coming from that is reflecting off of the object? The moon like object looks to dim to be illuminating the other object that much.

Originally posted by freelance_zenarchist
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a30cfa626db8.jpg[/atsimg]

If the object is hovering in the sky over the ocean, and the object above it is the moon, then where is the light coming from that is reflecting off of the object? The moon like object looks to dim to be illuminating the other object that much.

Perhaps it's not a reflection, but rather internal lighting of the yacht.

reply to post by draknoir2


What?

Well, people who will refuse to believe in something, will make another explanation fit, no matter how long it takes, or how difficult it is. I can't fathom in any way that this is a yacht. I'd be much more inclined to believe it is a clever fake, than any boat.

It doesn't move. The camera is steady enough in several shots to see if there is movement from a choppy ocean, and there is none. It was captured over the course of time. I think folks living on the coast would know a yacht. If this was, they knew it, and were trying to BS everyone. The "yacht" has no anchor lights. You must have these. It does not. The shots in better light show nothing beneath the "window" of the yacht. Mirage? Again, an identical mirage, taken over the course of a year? I don't think so.

I think either it's a clever hoax, or something we can't quite explain.

What I'd really like to see happen is the original footage analyzed by other professionals. It has been analyzed, and I am not trying to say those who did so were clueless, but more professional opinions would not hurt. I wonder where the footage is now.

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not


I figured it was nightime there just figured there would be a little more from him. Didn't really think about the time though and for that I apologize for my earlier remarks. I forget about the time difference between here and there. I guess I am just used to the time difference here in the states. I guess I need to pay better attention.

Originally posted by freelance_zenarchist
reply to post by draknoir2

 

What?

Boats have lights inside the cabin. Cabins have windows. Windows are transparent. If the cabin lights were on it would be visible from outside the boat. The light looked more fluorescent white that the color of the moon in that photo.

Or it could be something completely different. Just going along with the yacht theory since that's what the thread is about.

Originally posted by draknoir2
Boats have lights inside the cabin. Cabins have windows. Windows are transparent. If the cabin lights were on it would be visible from outside the boat. The light looked more fluorescent white that the color of the moon in that photo.

Or it could be something completely different. Just going along with the yacht theory since that's what the thread is about.

I didn't know if you were being serious or not.

Ok, show me where you see a window with the light on that could be illuminating the outside of the object.

To me it doesn't look like the light source is in the frame.

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not

 

I figured it was nightime there just figured there would be a little more from him. Didn't really think about the time though and for that I apologize for my earlier remarks. I forget about the time difference between here and there. I guess I am just used to the time difference here in the states. I guess I need to pay better attention.

tsurfer2000h.....

No worries!

Cheers
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by freelance_zenarchist


The zoom shot you posted at the lower right looks to me like a fluorescent lamp reflecting on glass from the inside. Just the impression I got.

reply to post by draknoir2


But where is the glass?

reply to post by free_spirit


All I can say is that I hope you are as critical of Jaime as you are of me.

I don't see it though, your integrity has been compromised and it has become clear that you are no longer an impartial UFO investigator.

But hey that's not the subject of this thread, the subject is The infamous Turkey a yacht?.

Notice the question mark, notice how I am just presenting a theory for discussion?

You didn't, you just went straight for the throat with no substance to argue your point.

Fine, Andrés isn't an esteemed UFO researcher like you or Jaime Maussan, so what? He presents a DIFFERENT theory, I never said I subscribed to it did I?

I said it could be PLAUSIBLE.

Certainly more plausible than an alien craft popping up in the same spot for years.

So I thank you for your words, but unfortunately they don't carry as much authority as they once did.

reply to post by Chadwickus


No offense, but I believe you are more interested in attacking people who don't believe in your plausible theory.... thus the flaming.

I tried to get interested again in the discussion, but you killed it.

I hope you find your answer... more importantly, I hope you are satisfied with it.

Best of luck.

Edited to add the word, "plausible".

Cheers.


[edit on 17-7-2010 by KANE OG]

reply to post by tsurfer2000h


Yes, the lack of lights is an interesting point.

But because it's the law, doesn't mean people will comply right?

Also, I don't think it is moored in a shipping lane, just moored off shore in the direction of the marina.