It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by micpsi
Originally posted by nerbot
If someone says they know what is a man made circle and what is "the real deal" and I ask them to show me the proof to verify how they know that difference, I am asking for information, therefore the burden of proof is for them to show me/us.
Rigid criteria for distinguishing between man-made and non-man-made crop circles have been developed over the years. They are regularly used by serious investigators.
Firstly, one can NEVER judge according to the quality of the crop circle. This is a subjective judgment over which different people will argue. Objective criteria are:
1. stalks inside pristine crop circles must show no signs of being snapped or splintered. Until human can learn to levitate, this is a reliable indication that the formation is not man-made;
2. some nodes on stalks must be swollen and elongated to a statistically significant degree, showing expulsion cavities in the walls of the nodes, where the superheated sap inside the stalk has been converted to steam and been blown out. See examples here:
www.bltresearch.com...
(scroll down to pics).
3. The plants must have been downed by significant bending at the nodes. If not, they have been mechanically crushed by boots and boards. Bending of most stalks near the ground and no sign of fractures or broken stalks is an excellent indication of non-human involvement. Care must be taken to take into account of phototropism and gravitropism;
Other criteria for distinguishing genuine from man-made crop circles are listed at Nancy Talbott's website:
www.bltresearch.com...
Originally posted by BillabongNath
reply to post by Charismagic
3 6 sided cubes. 666.
Originally posted by -W1LL
Originally posted by nerbot
Originally posted by queenannie38
sorry for the long quotes, but you wanted proof and so here it is. nothing required from you but to read - you don't even have to click anything unless you just want to, so there are source links provided.
I'm still waiting for you to show me the PROOF!
As everyone should know, witness testimony is fallible and cannot be guaranteed.
Nice pics, but can you show me what I asked for....I don't think so. At best this may be considered as "evidence" but not the 100% proof to back up your "real deal" statement, so I'll point out that so far, you are wrong and do not comprehend what the "real deal" actually is.
cheers, wanna try again?
Nerbot the burden of proof is on you. read my post a few back!
BENT NODES!!! again I will say to anyone who thinks CC can be exactly copied by man... duplicate the nodes.
Originally posted by BillabongNath
3 6 sided cubes. 666.
Originally posted by nerbot
Nice pics, but can you show me what I asked for....I don't think so. At best this may be considered as "evidence" but not the 100% proof to back up your "real deal" statement, so I'll point out that so far, you are wrong and do not comprehend what the "real deal" actually is.
cheers, wanna try again?
Originally posted by DCDAVECLARKE
reply to post by queenannie38
As an arty type i can tell yea thats hard work an very time consuming ,,coming from an unartistic cat like you thats a typical thing to say!
Originally posted by prepared4truth
if you know anything about sacred geometry, these cube crop circles are really REALLY deep. i only have a limited knowledge of the subject but it looks like a suggestion for free energy devices.
a device which utilizes the earth's rotation by using certain shapes and hedrons within other shapes and hedrons. if anyone else knows wth im talking about, help back me up lol