It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Alfie1
After nearly 9 years there seems to be nothing but feeble re-gurgitated material and fewer and fewer posters are supporting it. Is it time for truthers to move on to more productive pastures ?
Originally posted by filosophia
9/11 truth is still waiting for the day when they are proven wrong. It hasn't come yet.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by filosophia
9/11 truth is still waiting for the day when they are proven wrong. It hasn't come yet.
Every point any truther has brought up HAS been proven wrong.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by filosophia
9/11 truth is still waiting for the day when they are proven wrong. It hasn't come yet.
Every point any truther has brought up HAS been proven wrong.
Originally posted by cLOUDDEAD
Like NIST admitting freefall speed of Building 7, "proving" what Truthers were saying all along. lol
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by roboe
What I cannot understand is why "truthers" don't see that the most obvious truth could be the right one: the government knew and let it happen. It's pretty darn simple.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
As such it exhibits all the traits of the paranoid approach: millenarianism, hubris, junk science, egocentrism.
It won't go away, because it fulfils a basic need in a small subsection of people for Jungian narrative clarity, and it makes some feel safer and in a sense initiated, and therefore superior.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by filosophia
9/11 truth is still waiting for the day when they are proven wrong. It hasn't come yet.
Every point any truther has brought up HAS been proven wrong.
Debunking doesn't require that the lunatic that proposes a "question" about 9/11 admit that his question has been answered and proven to be a non issue.
If you think that it does, then you're sadly mistaken.
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
Even though I suppose I could be called a truther, I have no desire to engage with others under that label, because some of the arguments are silly beyond belief.
Originally posted by winston_jones
For example, the evidence of the event at the Pentagon and the nature of the collapse of the twin towers seem to prove, almost without doubt, an involvement that goes far beyond merely allowing it to happen.
I thought "Popular Mechanics" did a great job shutting this nonsense down.
Every outrageous claim has been thoroughly debunked.
Pretty much a bygone fad nowadays.