Scary Letter From Fidel Castro In Regards To Iran War

For you people fighting over the morality of Castro I think it's safe to say that both sides are right to a degree.

Castro has always been a mixed bag. From the despicable executions of all those people when he took over that bloodied his hands forever, to his iron will to resist Big Brother a few miles to the north.

I believe the reason Cuba's hospitals aren't doing so well might have something to do with a highly unjust embargo that the U.S. has had on them since he took over. The shifting of many supplies for the wealthy tourists might be being done in the interests of keeping an already anemic medical system from completely evaporating. I know that this sounds very crude and calculating but a massive embargo could force such drastic measures that would seem unfair (and are) to the locals of Cuba.

Because of the executions in his beginning days of rule I will never respect this man as a human. But I am wise enough to know that he has been around the international block and survived it.

So even though I don't like him, I will listen to what he says and give it the respect that it deserves. A lot in this case.

reply to post by DrumsRfun

Well it's more like 7or 8 years ago that I was referring to..in the Axis of Evil beginning times. And the point being made at that time was, to be blunt, those were the countries that the U.S. was "after" and attempting to topple and colonize. As I recall, there were 5 countries on the list.


[edit on 29-6-2010 by ~Lucidity]

reply to post by ~Lucidity



Thats ironic you say that...here is from the same source but from 2001.

They also will use the attacks to gain control of the few nations in the world who don’t allow Rothschild central banks and so less than one month after these attacks, US forces attack Afghanistan, one of only 7 nations in the world who don’t have a Rothschild controlled central bank.

Originally posted by ElectricUniverse

BTW, in case you didn't know, and in order for the U.S. to close their doors to Cubans castro set free criminals, not political prisoners but real criminals, and put them in boats alongside some real good Cuban people during the Cuban exodus during the 1980 boatlift...

This was a tactic used by castro to try to force the hand of the U.S. to close their doors to Cuban immigrants...

I personally feel it is wrong that Cubans were not freely allowed to leave if they did not care for their government. (Of course that happens all over the world, not just in Cuba) But I do personally think it is pretty darn brilliant of him to send over the criminals along with those who simply disagreed with Socialism. But lets face facts, the only reason Cubans got such an open door policy was because we wanted to make much ado about the evils of Communism, for political reasons. We dont have similarly open doors to those in Africa trying to escape sometimes far more deadly circumstances. It certainly wasnt humanitarian on the part of our leaders.

If I had my way, I would love to export our nastiest and most anti social people to a nation I considered to be an enemy to my own. In our case, we would have to deport many politicians and CEOs as well as criminals, but thats beside the point.

It was a brilliant little jab at the US. In my opinion.

You know, I was just starting to calm my mind down, you know, be all happy-go-lucky and if the world is going to hell in a handbasket so be it, who am I to think I'm so important to survive it, etc. and finally I have started to get my anxiety under control.

Then I read this godforsaken post.

F**k. Not that my solution was a bad one, but it looks like I have to work through it all over again.

reply to post by DrumsRfun


Yes. I think when I last stopped paying attention, Iraq and Afghanistan were already off the list. Makes sense, eh?

Now as for the actual way this is being put...tying it to Rothschild banks...isn't that just another way of saying the parts of the world not colonized by the current hegemony? I wonder how this correlates to the list of NAM countries I posted earlier.

Click here for more information.

Originally posted by one4all


So far the Polish and the German people of the world have been rendered voiceless and seem to be on a ruaway train right now.

Any other countries that I missed who have had a major member or group of important members step down,be killed or ousted by coup??

I mentioned this in your other thread where you also mentioned Japan's PM, but you forgot about:

Finland PM

and

UK PM, Gordon Brown

Four leaders in two months, but, of course, they all have their reasons.

reply to post by ~Lucidity


At least you are paying attention...I had to stumble on to my source accidentally.

Castro mentions France in his observations. What do you guys think about that? Going on the stance France took regarding Iraq, that wouldn't seem logical to me, as far as their involvement. He may just be including them as far as the nuclear issues because they do have nukes, and if it does go immediately nuclear as he predicts, all the rules might change?

Originally posted by Big Raging Loner
Nice little diagram of what's happening in regards to troop movements. Alas if only I knew how to imbed.

www.zerohedge.com...

Here you go...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8564fdb2a4e2.jpg[/atsimg]

best way to do this is to save the pic to your computer, upload it to the ATS Media portal (which you sign in using your ATS login info, first link at top of ATS pages), open the pic and copy the embed code that is associated with the pic and paste it into your post. (that's the quick and dirty of it)

if his country’s team makes it to that stage

I've often wondered why some things stand out to me. Sometimes they aren't a big deal, sometimes they are.

I know it's a stretch, but Castro has a rep for intelligence and subtlety when it suits his purpose. Has anyone considered that Castro might have been referring to Kenya?

reply to post by freetree64


FYI. Russia, America, and China have an unofficial deal to never fire nukes at each other, much less at anyone else.

You know, this makes me think of "Farenheit 451". With all their technology and ability to share information, no one in the general population knows how bad the world war has gotten until its too late and a plane drops a nuke on them. They were so technologically advanced and yet so distracted and apathetic about the world conditions that they had no idea nor did the care to find out what was going on around them. The story has some scary similarities to.modern day. If you can't ban books, don't teach kids to.read, know what I mean? If you haven't read the book then pick it up and read it and I guarantee you will ask the same questions as I am.

That being said, I do sometimes wonder just how well controlled is the dissimination of information and the media? How much or how little do we know about the world condition? How do we know the Muslim insurgents are really the bad guys? How do we know Castro is really a bad guy? How much has what we know about the world been skewed? How much have we been lied to?

What if Castro's letter really is the truth and our point of view has been so skewed that we don't even know it? What if there is a war out there and we just don't know it? What if its already much worse than we could imagine and we just haven't been told?

To whomever said Castro would fit in on ATS: How do you know he's not here now?

reply to post by dbloch7986


I've seen the movie and there are a lot of similarities to today's society.

An "unofficial deal" means that it is "not an official one," therefore, in the heat of battle, anything goes!

It used to be that the United States had what was called "The M-A-D" Doctrine (M.A.D. = Mutually Assured Destruction), meaning that if anyone fired a "nuke" at us first, then prepared to be melted! And, in my expert opinion, that's the way it should be.

I would much rather wake up one day and find out we melted another nation's city to protect innocent lives here, than to be so pacifistic that we stay asleep until we one day find out that one, or many of our cities have been melted! Keep the battle in their backyard, so don't fall asleep and allow it to come to ours.

People always amuse me on here by writing things like, well, what does Iran have to gain by a pre-emptive strike, or, I really don't think this or that will happen.

Wake up, people, reread your history!!! What American would have thought on December 6, 1941 that Pearl Harbor would be in ruins within 24 hours? They would have thought you mad had you even suggested it! And, what American would have thought on September 10, 2001 that the WTC, Twin Towers would have been lying in heaps of smoke and rubble within 24 hours. They would have thought you mad had you even suggested it!

The world is teetering on the brink of a World War, and all that most want to do is turn the other way, and pretend there's nothing wrong. Load your liquor cabinets, because the show is about to begin. I hope I am wrong, but it doesn't look good!

Is it just me or is the leader of a communist country being far more open to his people then the current administration of the United States?

reply to post by dreamwalker74


Everyone has an agenda, thats one thing we must all remember, even if the man happens to be trapped in a closet.

For my views on this go back a page or 2.


[edit on 29-6-2010 by NoJoker13]

reply to post by Gorman91

Does this have anything to do with the Tesla theory? That he gave three countries knowledge about his shields and weapons so that they could never be abused? Just wondering.

reply to post by DrumsRfun


Yes! Someone get's it! Iraq did not have a central bank either before we invaded them in 2003.